一唐宋以后医学多讹。西法近出详形迹而略气化得粗遗精皆失也。因集灵素诸经采其要语分篇详注为救其失起见非
好辩也识者谅之。
一每篇标题四字以别章节。知非着述体裁。然使学人先知纲目易于寻求不嫌有乖大雅也。
一是书注释多由心得。实皆以经解经毫无杜撰间采西法或用旧说总求其是而已。
一是书期于实用与各种经古文词不同。故解义训诂无汉宋门户之分。亦无中西异同之见。要使经旨皎然足裨实用为
有益于世耳。
一中国脏腑图。皆宋元后人所绘与人身脏腑真形多不能合。故各图皆照西医绘出较旧图实为美善。
一中国医林改错曾剖视脏腑与西医所言略同。足见中国脏腑与西人原无差别。因采其图以为印证。
一所采西人脏腑图。非但据西人之说。实则证以内经形迹丝毫不爽以其图按求经义则气化尤为着实。
一十二经脉奇经各穴。皆西医所不能知。因采铜人图绘出。意在发明经旨穴不尽载。惟采有关经气者详悉注之。
一胃五窍及三焦。中西皆无其图。今特本内经之义切实绘出。揆之西人形迹亦无不合。足见西人虽详于形迹而犹未
及内经之精。
一是书方证未能详列然于审证处方之理。业经发明则权衡在我。无论中西各医书皆有裁别不致迷眩。是医学正本清
源之书也。
一是书所引内难经文未及其半。然大义微言采注已备熟。此后再读全书自能涣然冰释。
一、唐宋以后的医学多有谬误。西医方法近世才出现,侧重于解剖形态而忽略了气化功能,结果既粗糙又遗漏了精髓,这都是失误。因此我汇集《灵枢》《素问》等经典,摘录其中的精要语句,分篇详细注释,旨在纠正这些失误,并非为了争辩。有识之士请谅解。
一、每篇标题用四个字以区别章节。我知道这不符合著述的常规体裁。但是让学习者先知道纲目,便于寻找,不嫌其有违高雅之体。
一、本书的注释多出于个人心得。实际上都是以经典解释经典,毫无杜撰之处,间或采用西医方法或使用旧说,总以求真求是为目的而已。
一、本书期望于实用,与各种经书的古文辞不同。因此在解释义理和训诂上没有汉代与宋代的门户之见,也没有中西异同的偏见。只要使经旨明白清楚,足以裨益实用,对世道有益罢了。
一、中国的脏腑图,都是宋元以后人所绘制,与人身脏腑的真实形状大多不能吻合。所以各图都按照西医的方法绘制,比旧图确实更为完善美好。
一、中国医林改错曾剖视脏腑,与西医所说的大致相同。足见中国脏腑与西方人原本没有差别。因此采纳其图作为印证。
一、所采用的西方人脏腑图,不仅依据西人的说法,实则以内经中的形体痕迹来验证,丝毫不差。以其图按求经义,则气化理论尤为切实。
一、十二经脉及奇经各穴,都是西医所不知道的。因此采用铜人图绘制出来。意在阐明经旨,穴位不全载录,只选取与经气有关的穴位详细注释。
一、胃的五窍及三焦,中西都没有其图。现在特别根据内经的意义切实绘制出来。推究西人的形体痕迹也无不吻合。足见西人虽然详于形体痕迹,却仍未达到内经的精微。
一、本书方证未能详细列举,然而对于审证处方的道理,已经阐明,那么权衡在我。无论中西各医书都有裁断辨别,不至于迷乱眩惑。这是医学正本清源的书啊。
一、本书所引用的《内经》《难经》经文未达一半,但大义微言采注已完备。熟读之后,再读全书自然能涣然冰释。
1. Medicine after the Tang and Song dynasties has contained many errors. Western medicine, having emerged recently, focuses on anatomical traces while neglecting Qi transformation (the functional dynamics of vital energy), resulting in both coarseness and omission of essence; these are all mistakes. Therefore, I have compiled key passages from classics such as *Lingshu* (Spiritual Pivot) and *Suwen* (Basic Questions), annotating them chapter by chapter to correct these errors, not for the sake of debate. Those with insight will understand.
2. Each chapter title consists of four characters to distinguish sections. I am aware this does not conform to standard scholarly writing conventions. However, it allows students to grasp the framework and headings easily, facilitating search without concern for violating elegance.
3. The annotations in this book are largely derived from personal insights. In essence, they explain the classics using the classics, with no fabrication. Occasionally, Western methods or older theories are adopted, but the ultimate goal is always to seek truth and correctness.
4. This book aims at practical application, differing from the classical prose of various medical texts. Therefore, in interpreting meanings and philology, there is no division between Han and Song schools, nor any bias regarding similarities or differences between Chinese and Western medicine. The aim is simply to make the principles of the classics clear and beneficial for practical use, thereby contributing to society.
5. Anatomical charts of Zang-Fu organs in China were drawn by people after the Song and Yuan dynasties and often do not match the true anatomy of human organs. Thus, the charts in this book are redrawn according to Western anatomical standards, which are indeed superior to the old charts.
6. *Yilin Gaicuo* (Correction of Errors in Medical Forest) in China involved dissection of organs, which aligns roughly with Western descriptions. This proves that Chinese understanding of Zang-Fu organs differs fundamentally from Western anatomy only in name, not in reality. Their charts are therefore adopted for verification.
7. The Western anatomical charts used here are not merely based on Western assertions; when verified against the morphological descriptions in the *Neijing* (Inner Canon), they match perfectly. Using these charts to explore the meaning of the classics makes the theory of Qi transformation particularly concrete and substantial.
8. The acupoints of the Twelve Regular Meridians and the Extraordinary Vessels are unknown to Western medicine. Therefore, charts from the Bronze Man model are adopted for illustration. The intent is to elucidate the principles of the meridians. Not all acupoints are listed; only those relevant to meridian Qi are annotated in detail.
9. There are no existing charts for the five openings of the Stomach or the Sanjiao (Triple Burner) in either Chinese or Western traditions. Here, they are carefully illustrated based on the principles of the *Neijing*. These illustrations also align with Western anatomical observations. This demonstrates that although Western medicine details anatomical structures well, it has not yet reached the profundity of the *Neijing*.
10. While this book does not list all syndrome-formula correspondences in detail, it clarifies the principles of pattern differentiation and prescription formulation. With this mastery, one can judge any medical text, Chinese or Western, without confusion. This is a work that restores the root and clears the source of medicine.
11. Although less than half of the quotations from the *Neijing* and *Nanjing* (Classic of Difficult Issues) are included, the major principles and subtle meanings have been sufficiently annotated. Once familiar with these, reading the complete classics will naturally become clear and understandable.