桂枝(三两去皮) 芍药(三两) 甘草(二两炙) 生姜(三两切) 大枣(十二枚擘)
上五味。 咀。以水七升。微火煮取三升。去滓。适寒温服一升。服已。须臾啜热稀粥
一升
余以助药力。温覆令一时许。遍身 微似有汗者益佳。不可令大汗如水流漓。病必不除
。
若一服汗出。病瘥。停后服。不必尽剂。若不汗重服。根据前法。又不汗。小促役其间。半
日
许令三服尽。若病重者。一日一夜服。周时观之。服一剂尽。病症犹在者。更作服。若汗不
出者。乃服二三剂。禁生冷粘滑肉面五辛酒酪臭恶等物。此太阳中风主治之方也。经云。太
阳中风。阳浮而阴弱。阳浮者。热自发。阴弱者。汗自出。啬啬恶寒。淅淅恶风。翕翕发热
。鼻鸣干呕者。桂枝汤主之。卫强故阳脉浮。营弱故阴脉弱。卫本行脉外。又得风邪相助。
则
其气愈外浮。阳主气。风为阳邪。阳盛则气易蒸。故阳浮者热自发也。营本行脉内。更与卫
气不谐。则其气愈内弱。阴主血。汗为血液。阴弱则液易泄。故阴弱者汗自出也。啬啬恶寒
。内气虚也。淅淅恶风。外体疏也。恶寒未有不恶风。恶风未有不恶寒。二者相因。所以经
文互言之。翕翕发热。乃就皮毛上形容。鼻鸣。阳邪壅也。干呕。阳气逆气。太阳中风之病
状如此。谛实此证。宜用此方。凡欲用仲景方。先须辨证也。
愚按本方主以桂枝者。以桂枝能入营而作汗。非徒取其能驱风也。辅以芍药者。以芍药
能和营而息风。非徒取其能止汗也。桂枝得芍药。于发汗之中。仍寓敛液之义。芍药得桂
枝。于益血之内。仍收化气之功。而桂枝又藉生姜之力。攘之于外。以导风邪之出路。芍药
又得甘草大枣之力。安之于内。以断风邪之入路。凡读仲景方。宜深求制方之义。
再按仲景于桂枝汤一方。独自注云。桂枝本为解肌。解肌者。乃解肌表之邪。不使扰动
营血
。以是示微发汗于不发汗之中也。而要之桂枝本入营作汗之品。赖有芍药以收敛汗之功。今
人误谓桂枝一味。能固卫而敛汗。失之远矣。观其服法云。服已须臾 热稀粥一升。以助
药力。温覆令一时许。遍身 微似有汗者益佳。不可令如水流漓。此段斡旋之法。具
有精义。 热稀粥者。欲藉谷气以助营血而资其汗。若如水流漓。则营弱者益不能胜。故曰
病必不除。此中用法之妙。全在营卫强弱上讨消息。处桂枝汤方者。先须参透此一关。
再按经文云。太阳病。头痛发热汗出恶风者。桂枝汤主之。此与前条太阳中风阳浮阴弱
一段大
同小异。何所取而重叠其文耶。殊不知彼条言太阳中风。乃昭揭中风之病状而示之以主方。
此
条浑言太阳病。则如所云头项强痛恶寒。乃中风伤寒公共之太阳病。即如本条之头痛发热
恶风
。亦太阳中风伤寒之公共证。更何所辨而知其孰宜麻黄孰宜桂枝耶。其关键全以汗出为辨。汗
出便是桂枝
的对之证。若汗不出而发热脉浮紧者。是麻黄汤证。误用桂枝之辛热。而益以芍药之酸收。
则寒邪凝结。漫无出路。变证蜂起。即显犯桂枝之大禁矣。此仲景教人辨证之法也。
桂枝汤有禁用三法。用桂枝者不可不知。其一曰。桂枝本为解肌。若其人脉浮紧发热汗
不出者
。不可与也。夫脉浮紧发热汗不出。是寒伤营之脉证。宜麻黄汤主治。脉浮缓发热汗自出。
是风伤卫之脉证。宜桂枝汤主治。今见寒伤营之脉证。即不得主用风伤卫之治法。以其同见
头项强痛恶寒之太阳病。同见浮脉。最易牵混。故重言之曰常须识此。勿令误也。不此之察而
误
用之。其人营气本实。邪无出路。不能外泄。势必上涌。又得辛热酸敛之性。怫郁其营中之
血。不至吐脓血不止。故曰凡服桂枝汤吐者。其后必吐脓血也。至若酒客病不可与桂枝。得
汤则呕。仲景即自注云。以酒客不喜甘故也。诸家皆以酒客胃中湿热素盛。故得之便满逆而
呕
。则由此而类推之。凡感外邪而中挟温热者。其不可乱用桂枝也审矣。予每见今人误认桂枝
汤为敛汗之药。凡遇湿温风热等证。见其汗出热不解。竟敢恣用桂枝而无忌。此又仲景当日
意料之所不及。用之贻误。不自咎其辨证之不清。反谓古方之难用。而鉴此者转引叔和桂枝
下咽阳盛则毙之说。实其言以相戒。其亦勿思之甚也矣。
桂枝之禁例
既明。则凡见头项强痛恶寒之太阳病。而汗出脉浮缓者。主以桂枝之解肌而无疑矣。解肌者
乃解其肌表之邪。而仍欲使之微似有汗也。故经中又指桂枝曰发汗。欲发汗而仍不欲
大发其汗。故又曰和。和则发汗
之机必不迅。故他方皆刻期取效。而桂枝服后。病证仍在。仍宜作服。观其服法云。若一服
汗出。病瘥。停后服。不必尽剂。若不汗重服。根据前法。又不汗。后服小促役其间。半日许
令三服尽。若病重者。一日一夜服。周时观之。服一剂尽。病证仍在。更作服。若汗不出。
乃至二三剂。以是为调和营卫。解肌发汗。一定不易之法。但须辨证明晰。用当其病。即未
遽效。仍堪复进。以视麻黄汤之大发其汗。固有间也。
再太阳病以风伤卫寒伤营二证。分主桂枝麻黄二法。其说始于许学士。而前明方中行及
国朝
如喻嘉言程郊倩辈。皆仍其说。唯柯韵伯谓桂枝汤一方。凡头痛发热恶风恶寒其脉浮弱汗自
出者。不拘何经。不论中风伤寒杂病。咸得用此发汗。若妄汗妄下而表不解者。仍当用此解
肌。推柯氏之意。盖以仲景于桂枝汤。散见于他经。而用之者亦多。故主论若此。而予就经
文细绎之。如经所云伤寒发汗解半日许复烦脉浮数者可更发汗宜桂枝汤一条。柯氏殆据此以
为伤寒亦宜桂枝之证。而不知经衣冠文物言伤寒发汗解。其用麻黄发汗可知矣。半日许复烦。脉
转浮数。则因发汗之后。在外之风邪易袭。而在内之营气已伤。烦因心扰。数属阴虚。奚堪
复任麻黄。其改用桂枝者。非太阳伤寒之宜桂枝。乃发汗后复烦脉浮数之的宜桂枝也。至阳
明
病之亦有用桂枝者。若经云阳明病。脉迟。汗出多微恶寒者。表未解。可发汗。宜桂枝汤是
也。按阳明本自多汗。但不恶寒而恶热。今微恶寒。则太阳之表证未罢。亟当从太阳领出
其邪。此又非阳明病之宜桂枝。乃太阳表未解之的宜桂枝也。且其下文又云。阳明病。脉浮
无汗而喘者。发汗则愈。宜麻黄汤。合此二条观之。要知邪自太阳初入阳明。须察其邪自
太阳中风而来。而中风证未罢。仍当从中风主治之法。邪自太阳伤寒而来。而伤寒证未罢
。仍当从伤寒主治之法。益见桂枝麻黄。分主中风伤寒二证。为天
然不易之定法矣。至三阴经本无发汗之例。虽太阴病有脉浮可发汗之条。亦非太阴病宜用桂
枝。亦以脉浮自当发汗。而本方芍药生姜大枣。亦得资以奠安太阴。若谓妄汗妄下之后而表
未解者。亦宜用此解肌。试思何谓妄汗。正谓桂枝证误用麻黄。麻黄证误用桂枝耳。且发汗
后不可更用桂枝汤。下后不可更用桂枝汤。仲景设有明禁。其误下后间有宜桂枝者。亦须察
其脉浮。其气上冲者。方可与之。若不尔者。不可与也。仲景经文。本自明白易晓。若如柯
氏所云。则求之多歧。适以滋乱。转使后之学人。漫无头绪可寻。况风寒之邪。皆从太阳而
入。太阳一经。实为伤寒家开手第一工夫。此等源头不清。开手便错。余故不惮援引经文。
以直破其惑。而临证处方。庶有把握。不致淆乱矣。
再按桂枝汤固为太阳初病时立法。而日久亦有宜用之者。总以外证未解为辨。至柯氏所
指误
汗误下两层。此恰浑举不得。自当分辨。盖误汗之后。即有亡阳漏风诸变。另有专方救逆。
虽仲景有伤寒大下后复发汗。心下痞。恶风者。表未解也。不可攻痞。当先解表之条。亦因
下后发汗。其痞究从误下所致。又从恶寒上辨出表未解来。自当先解其表。表解乃可攻痞。
此外别无汗后复用桂枝明文。更有表里错杂之邪。宜先里后表者。若下利清谷。腹胀满。身
疼痛者。则里证急而表证缓。又当先温其里。后攻其表。必俟下利止而身痛未休。再当消息
和解其外。解外仍不离桂枝成法。此中出入变化。具有元机。全要平时体认经文。临病详参
脉证。则一百一十三方。皆无误用。奚啻桂枝也。
再按桂枝固为太阳主方。而救逆之法。从此方变化者。无论增一味。减一味。其主治各
不同
。但就原方增减分两。即另立汤名。治证迥别。如本方加桂即名桂枝加桂汤。重加芍药即名
桂枝加芍
药汤之类是也。另宜逐方诠解。附于本方之后。而总以此方为祖。故以是冠一百一十三方之
首。
桂枝(三两,去皮) 芍药(三两) 甘草(二两,炙) 生姜(三两,切) 大枣(十二枚,掰开)
以上五味药。捣碎。用水七升。用小火煮取三升。去渣。温度适宜时服用一升。服完后。不久喝热稀粥一升。
以辅助药力。盖被保暖约一小时。全身微微似有汗出的最好。不可令大汗淋漓如水流出。病必定不能去除。
如果服一次药后汗出。病愈。停服后面的药。不必喝完所有药剂。如果没有汗出则重复服用。依据前面的方法。仍然没有汗出。稍微缩短服药间隔时间。半日
左右让三服药喝完。如果病重的。一天一夜服药。观察二十四小时。服完一剂药。病症还在的。再制作服用。如果汗不
出来的。才服用二三剂。禁止吃生冷、粘滑、肉类、面食、五辛、酒、乳酪、气味恶臭等食物。这是治疗太阳中风证的主方。经典说。太
阳中风证。脉象阳部浮而阴部弱。阳部浮的。发热自然发生。阴部弱的。汗自然流出。怕冷畏缩。怕风如冷水洒身。发热如羽毛覆盖般温热。鼻鸣响、干呕的。用桂枝汤主治。卫气强盛所以阳脉浮。营气虚弱所以阴脉弱。卫气本来行于脉外。又得到风邪的帮助。
那么
它的阳气更加向外浮越。阳主气。风为阳邪。阳气盛则气容易蒸腾。所以阳部浮则热自发。营气本来行于脉内。更与卫
气不协调。那么它的阴气更加向内虚弱。阴主血。汗为血液所化。阴弱则津液容易泄出。所以阴部弱则汗自出。怕冷畏缩。是体内正气虚。怕风如冷水洒身。是体表疏松。怕冷的没有不怕风的。怕风的没有不怕冷的。两者互为因果。所以经文中互相阐述。发热如羽毛覆盖般温热。是在皮毛表面形容的症状。鼻鸣。是阳邪壅滞。干呕。是阳气上逆。太阳中风病的症状就是这样。仔细审察这个证候。应当使用此方。凡是想要使用张仲景的方子。必须先辨证。
我按:本方以桂枝为主药。因为桂枝能入营分而发汗。不仅仅是因为它能驱风。辅以芍药。因为芍药
能和营分而平息风邪。不仅仅是因为它能止汗。桂枝得到芍药。在发汗之中。仍蕴含收敛津液的意义。芍药得到桂
枝。在益血之内。仍收取化生阳气的功效。而桂枝又借助生姜的力量。在外部排斥风邪。以引导风邪出路。芍药又得到甘草大枣的力量。在内部安定。以切断风邪进入的路径。凡是读张仲景的方子。应该深入探究制方的意义。
再按:张仲景在桂枝汤一方。独自注释说。桂枝本是解肌的。解肌。就是解除肌表的邪气。不让扰动
营血
。以此显示在不发汗中微发汗的意思。然而桂枝本是入营分作汗的药物。依靠芍药来收敛汗的功效。现在的人错误地认为桂枝一味药。能固护卫气而收敛汗。这就差得很远了。看它的服法说。服完后不久喝热稀粥一升。以助
药力。盖被保暖约一小时。全身微微似有汗出的最好。不可像水流漓那样大汗。这段调和的方法。具有精妙的义理。喝热稀粥。是想借谷气来资助营血从而资生汗源。如果像水流漓那样大汗。那么营气虚弱的人更不能承受。所以说
病必定不能去除。这里的用法之妙。全在于营卫强弱的权衡。使用桂枝汤方的人。必须先参透这一关。
再按经文说。太阳病。头痛、发热、汗出、恶风的。桂枝汤主治。这和前一条太阳中风阳浮阴弱
一段大
同小异。为什么要取这种重叠的文字呢?殊不知前条说太阳中风。是明确揭示中风病的症状并给出主方。
这条笼统地说太阳病。那么像所说的头项强痛、恶寒。是中风和伤寒共同的太阳病。就像本条的头痛、发热、恶风
。也是太阳中风和伤寒的共同证候。怎么辨别知道谁适合麻黄汤谁适合桂枝汤呢?其关键完全以汗出为辨别标准。汗
出就是桂枝汤的对证。如果无汗且发热、脉浮紧的。是麻黄汤证。误用桂枝的辛热。再加上芍药的酸收。
那么寒邪凝结。漫无出路。变证蜂拥而起。就明显犯了桂枝汤的大禁忌了。这是张仲景教导人辨证的方法。
桂枝汤有三条禁用法则。使用桂枝的人不可不知道。第一条说。桂枝本是解肌的。如果其人脉浮紧、发热、汗
不出。不可给予。夫脉浮紧、发热、汗不出。是寒伤营分的脉证。宜用麻黄汤主治。脉浮缓、发热、汗自出。
是风伤卫分的脉证。宜用桂枝汤主治。现在见到寒伤营分的脉证。就不能主要使用风伤卫分的治法。因为它们都见
到头项强痛、恶寒的太阳病。都见到浮脉。最容易混淆。所以着重说道:必须常记住这一点。不要弄错。不考察这一点而误
用的。其人营气原本实盛。邪气没有出路。不能向外宣泄。势必向上冲涌。又得辛热酸敛的药性。郁遏营中的
血。不到吐出脓血不止。所以说凡是服桂枝汤呕吐的。其后必定吐脓血。至于如果是嗜酒之人患病不可给桂枝。得
汤则呕吐。张仲景自己注释说。因为嗜酒之人不喜欢甘味。各家都认为嗜酒之人胃中湿热素来旺盛。所以得了桂枝汤便胀满上逆而呕
吐。由此类推。凡是感受外邪而中间夹杂温热的。其不可乱用桂枝汤是很明显的。我常见今人错误地把桂枝
汤当作敛汗的药。凡是遇到湿温、风热等证候。见到他们汗出热不退。竟然敢肆意使用桂枝而无顾忌。这又是张仲景当时意料之外的。使用它造成延误。不责怪自己辨证不清。反而说古方难用。而借鉴这一点的人反而引用王叔和“桂枝下咽,阳盛则毙”的说法。实际上是用这些话来互相告诫。这也太不思考了。
桂枝的禁忌条例
既然明确了。那么凡是见到头项强痛、恶寒的太阳病。而汗出、脉浮缓的。以桂枝解肌无疑了。解肌者
就是解除肌表的邪气。而仍然希望让它微微似有汗出。所以经文中又指桂枝说发汗。想发汗却仍然不想
大发其汗。所以又说和。和则发汗
的机制必然不迅猛。所以其他方子都是按时辰见效。而桂枝服后。病证仍在。仍宜再次服用。看它的服法说。如果服一次药
汗出。病愈。停服后面的药。不必喝完所有药剂。如果没有汗出则重复服用。依据前面的方法。仍然没有汗出。后服稍微缩短间隔时间。半日左
右让三服药喝完。如果病重的。一天一夜服药。观察二十四小时。服完一剂药。病证仍在。再制作服用。如果汗不出。
甚至到二三剂。以此作为调和营卫。解肌发汗。一定不变的方法。但须辨证明晰。用药符合病情。即使没有立刻见效。仍可继续进服。以此来看麻黄汤的大发其汗。确实有区别。
再太阳病以风伤卫、寒伤营两个证候。分别主治桂枝、麻黄两法。这种说法始于许学士。而前明方中行及
清朝
如喻嘉言、程郊倩等人。都沿袭这种说法。只有柯韵伯认为桂枝汤一方。凡是头痛、发热、恶风、恶寒、脉浮弱、汗自出的人。不拘哪一经。不论中风、伤寒、杂病。都可用此发汗。如果妄汗、妄下而表不解的。仍当用此解肌。推究柯氏的意思。大概是鉴于张仲景在桂枝汤。散见于其他经。而使用者也很多。所以主张这样论述。而我根据经文细细推敲。如经文所说伤寒发汗解半日许复烦、脉浮数者可更发汗、宜桂枝汤一条。柯氏大概据此以为伤寒也宜桂枝的证候。而不知经文中提到伤寒发汗解。用的是麻黄发汗可知。半日许复烦。脉
转浮数。则是因发汗之后。在外的风邪易袭。而在内的营气已伤。烦是因为心受扰。数脉属于阴虚。怎能再承受麻黄。其改用桂枝者。不是太阳伤寒宜桂枝。乃是发汗后复烦、脉浮数的确宜桂枝。至于阳明
病也有用桂枝的。如经文说阳明病。脉迟。汗出多、微恶寒的。表未解。可发汗。宜桂枝汤是也。按阳明病本身多汗。但不恶寒而恶热。现在微恶寒。则太阳的表证未罢。亟当从太阳引出其邪。这又不是阳明病宜桂枝。乃太阳表未解的确宜桂枝。而且其下文又说。阳明病。脉浮
无汗而喘的。发汗则愈。宜麻黄汤。结合这两条看。要知道邪气从太阳初入阳明。须察知邪气从太阳中风而来。而中风证未罢。仍当中风主治之法。邪气从太阳伤寒而来。而伤寒证未罢
。仍当从伤寒主治之法。更加可见桂枝、麻黄。分主中风、伤寒两个证候。是天然不变定法。至于三阴经本无发汗的先例。虽然太阴病有脉浮可发汗的条文。也不是太阴病宜用桂枝。也是因为脉浮自当发汗。而本方芍药、生姜、大枣。也能借此安顿太阴。如果说妄汗、妄下之后而表未解的。也宜用此解肌。试想什么是妄汗。正是指桂枝证误用麻黄。麻黄证误用桂枝罢了。而且发汗后不可再用桂枝汤。下后不可再用桂枝汤。张仲景设有明确禁令。其误下后间有宜桂枝的。也必须察知
其脉浮。其气上冲的。才可以给予。如果不这样。不可给予。张仲景经文。本来明白易懂。如果像柯
氏所说。则在众多歧义中寻求。反而增加混乱。转而使后来的学人。漫无头绪可寻。况且风寒之邪。皆从太阳而
入。太阳一经。实在是伤寒家入门第一工夫。这种源头不清。入门就错。我故不惜援引经文。以直接破除其疑惑。而临证处方。才有把握。不至于混淆乱了。
再按桂枝汤固然为太阳初病时立法。而日久也有宜用的。总以外证未解为辨别标准。至于柯氏所
指误
汗、误下两层。这里恰好不能笼统列举。自当分辨。盖误汗之后。就有亡阳、漏风等变证。另有专方救逆。
虽然张仲景有伤寒大下后复发汗。心下痞。恶风的。表未解也。不可攻痞。当先解表的条文。也是因为下后发汗。其痞终究从误下所致。又从恶寒上辨出表未解来。自当先解其表。表解才可攻痞。
此外别无汗后复用桂枝明文。更有表里错杂之邪。宜先里后表的。若下利清谷。腹胀满。身
疼痛的。则里证急而表证缓。又当先温其里。后攻其表。必待下利止而身痛未休。再当斟酌和解其外。解外仍不离桂枝成法。这其中出入变化。具有玄机。全要平时体认经文。临病详参
脉证。则一百一十三方。都没有误用。何止桂枝汤呢。
再按桂枝固然是太阳主方。而救逆之法。从此方变化而来的。无论加一味。减一味。其主治各
不同
。只是就原方增减分量。就另立汤名。治证截然不同。如本方加桂即名桂枝加桂汤。重加芍药即名桂枝加芍
药汤之类是也。另外适宜逐方解释。附于本方之后。而总以此方为祖方。所以以此方冠于一百一十三方之
首。
Guizhi (Cinnamon Twig, 3 liang, bark removed) Shaoyao (White Peony Root, 3 liang) Gancao (Licorice Root, 2 liang, honey-fried) Shengjiang (Fresh Ginger, 3 liang, sliced) Dazao (Jujube, 12 pieces, torn open)
The above five herbs. Crushed. Boiled in seven sheng of water. Simmered over a mild fire to obtain three sheng. Strained. Taken at a suitable warm temperature, one sheng per dose. After taking the medicine. Shortly afterwards, drink one sheng of hot thin porridge
to assist the medicinal power. Cover with warmth for about one hour. The best outcome is when there is a slight perspiration all over the body. Do not allow profuse sweating like water pouring out. The disease will certainly not be eliminated.
If after one dose sweat appears and the illness resolves, stop subsequent doses. There is no need to finish the entire decoction. If no sweat occurs, repeat the dose. Follow the previous method. If still no sweat, slightly shorten the interval between doses. Within half a day
allow three doses to be finished. If the illness is severe, administer medicine over a day and night. Observe for twenty-four hours. After finishing one prescription, if symptoms persist, prepare another dose. If sweat does not
occur, then administer two or three doses. Prohibit consumption of raw/cold foods, sticky/slippery foods, meat, wheat products, five pungent spices, alcohol, dairy products, and foul-smelling substances. This is the principal formula for treating Taiyang Wind-Strike syndrome (Taiyang Zhongfeng). The Classic states: In Taiyang Wind-Strike syndrome, the pulse is floating on the exterior (Yang) and weak on the interior (Yin). Floating Yang indicates spontaneous heat generation. Weak Yin indicates spontaneous sweating. Feeling cold with shrinking posture (Sese), feeling wind chill as if being sprinkled with cold water (Xixi), feeling feverish as if covered by feathers (Xixi), nasal congestion with dry retching are indications for Guizhi Tang (Cinnamon Twig Decoction). Wei Qi (Defensive Qi) is strong, hence the Yang pulse floats. Ying Qi (Nutritive Qi) is weak, hence the Yin pulse is weak. Wei Qi naturally circulates outside the vessels. Assisted by Wind pathogen,
its Qi floats further outward. Yang governs Qi. Wind is a Yang pathogen. Excess Yang causes Qi to steam easily. Hence, floating Yang results in spontaneous heat. Ying Qi naturally circulates inside the vessels. When disharmonious with Wei Qi, its Qi becomes weaker internally. Yin governs Blood. Sweat is transformed from Blood fluids. Weak Yin leads to easy leakage of fluids. Hence, weak Yin results in spontaneous sweating. "Sese" (feeling cold) indicates deficiency of internal Qi. "Xixi" (feeling wind chill) indicates laxity of the exterior body. One who fears cold inevitably fears wind; one who fears wind inevitably fears cold. They are interdependent, which is why the Classic text discusses them interchangeably. "Xixi" fever describes the sensation on the skin and hair. Nasal congestion indicates obstruction of Yang pathogens. Dry retching indicates rebellion of Yang Qi. These are the clinical manifestations of Taiyang Wind-Strike syndrome. Carefully examine this pattern; this formula is appropriate. Whenever using Zhang Zhongjing's formulas, one must first differentiate the syndrome.
My commentary: The principal herb in this formula is Guizhi because it enters the Ying level to induce sweating, not merely for its ability to expel Wind. Shaoyao is used as an assistant because it harmonizes Ying and pacifies Wind, not merely for its ability to stop sweating. When Guizhi combines with Shaoyao, within the action of inducing sweat, there is still the meaning of astringing fluids. When Shaoyao combines with Guizhi, within the benefit of nourishing blood, there is still the function of transforming Qi. Furthermore, Guizhi relies on the power of Shengjiang to repel externally, guiding the exit route for Wind pathogens. Shaoyao relies on the power of Gancao and Dazao to stabilize internally, cutting off the entry route for Wind pathogens. Those studying Zhang Zhongjing's formulas should deeply seek the rationale behind formula construction.
Furthermore: Zhang Zhongjing annotated Guizhi Tang alone, stating: "Guizhi is originally for resolving the muscle layer." Resolving the muscle layer means releasing pathogens from the muscular exterior without disturbing Ying and Blood. Thus, it demonstrates inducing slight sweat within non-sweating methods. However, Guizhi is inherently a substance that enters Ying to produce sweat. It relies on Shaoyao to restrain the effect of sweating. Modern people mistakenly believe that Guizhi alone can secure Wei and astringe sweat, which is far from the truth. Observing its administration method: "After ingestion, shortly drink hot thin porridge to assist medicinal power. Cover with warmth for about one hour. Slight perspiration all over the body is best. Do not allow profuse sweating like flowing water." This method of regulation possesses profound significance. Drinking hot thin porridge aims to utilize grain Qi to assist Ying and Blood to generate sweat. If sweating is profuse like flowing water, those with weak Ying cannot withstand it. Hence, "the disease will certainly not be eliminated." The subtlety of usage here lies entirely in the balance of Ying and Wei strength. Practitioners prescribing Guizhi Tang must thoroughly comprehend this principle.
Again, the Classic states: "In Taiyang disease, characterized by headache, fever, sweating, and aversion to wind, Guizhi Tang is indicated." This is largely similar but slightly different from the preceding passage on Taiyang Wind-Strike with floating Yang and weak Yin. Why repeat the text? It is unknown that the former passage explicitly reveals Wind-Strike symptoms and indicates the principal formula. This passage generally speaks of Taiyang disease. Symptoms such as stiffness and pain in the head and neck, aversion to cold, are common Taiyang diseases for both Wind-Strike and Cold damage. Similarly, headache, fever, and aversion to wind in this passage are also common patterns for Taiyang Wind-Strike and Cold damage. How can one distinguish whether Mahuang Tang or Guizhi Tang is suitable? The key lies entirely in the presence or absence of sweating. Sweating is the specific indication for Guizhi Tang. If there is no sweating, with fever and a floating-tight pulse, it is a Mahuang Tang pattern. Misusing the acrid-warm nature of Guizhi combined with the sour-astringent nature of Shaoyao would cause Cold pathogens to coagulate with no exit route, leading to numerous complications. This would clearly violate the major contraindication of Guizhi. This is how Zhang Zhongjing teaches syndrome differentiation.
There are three contraindications for Guizhi Tang. Users of Guizhi must know them. First: "Guizhi is originally for resolving the muscle layer. If the pulse is floating-tight, with fever and no sweating, do not administer it." A floating-tight pulse with fever and no sweating indicates Cold damaging Ying. Mahuang Tang is indicated. A floating-slow pulse with fever and spontaneous sweating indicates Wind damaging Wei. Guizhi Tang is indicated. Now, seeing Cold-damaging-Ying patterns, one must not primarily use Wind-damaging-Wei treatments. Because they share common Taiyang symptoms like head/neck stiffness and aversion to cold, and both show floating pulses, they are easily confused. Therefore, it is emphasized: "Always remember this. Do not make mistakes." Failing to observe this and misusing it: if the patient's Ying Qi is originally solid, the pathogen has no outlet and cannot excrete outward. It will necessarily surge upward. Combined with the acrid-warm and sour-astringent properties, it will stagnate the blood in Ying. Until vomiting of pus and blood occurs, it will not stop. Hence, "Anyone who takes Guizhi Tang and vomits will subsequently vomit pus and blood." As for patients habitually drinking alcohol, Guizhi should not be given; taking the decoction causes vomiting. Zhang Zhongjing annotates: "Because alcoholics dislike sweet flavors." Various schools attribute this to pre-existing damp-heat in the stomach of alcoholics, causing fullness, rebellion, and vomiting upon intake. By analogy, any external pathogen complicated by warm-heat should definitely not misuse Guizhi. I often see modern practitioners mistakenly regard Guizhi Tang as an antiperspirant. Encountering damp-warmth or wind-heat patterns where sweating persists without fever resolution, they dare to recklessly use Guizhi without restraint. This was beyond Zhang Zhongjing's anticipation. Such misuse causes harm. Instead of blaming unclear differentiation, they blame ancient formulas as difficult to use. Those referencing this cite Wang Shuhe's saying "Once Guizhi enters the throat, Yang excess leads to death," using these words to warn each other. This shows extreme lack of reflection.
Contraindications of Guizhi
Once clarified, then for any Taiyang disease presenting with head/neck stiffness, aversion to cold, with sweating and a floating-slow pulse, using Guizhi to resolve the muscle layer is unquestionable. Resolving the muscle layer means releasing exterior pathogens while still aiming for slight perspiration. Hence, the Classic refers to Guizhi as inducing sweat. Wanting to induce sweat yet not wishing to induce excessive sweat, it is also called "harmonizing." Harmonizing means the mechanism of sweating will not be rapid. Other formulas take effect according to strict timeframes, whereas after taking Guizhi, if symptoms persist, re-administration is appropriate. Observing its administration: "If after one dose sweat appears and illness resolves, stop subsequent doses. No need to finish the decoction. If no sweat, repeat dose following previous method. If still no sweat, shorten intervals for subsequent doses. Within half a day, finish three doses. For severe cases, administer over a day and night. Observe for 24 hours. After finishing one prescription, if symptoms remain, prepare another dose. If no sweat, up to two or three doses." This is the unchanging method for harmonizing Ying and Wei, resolving muscle layer, and inducing sweat. However, syndrome differentiation must be clear, and medication must match the pathology. Even if immediate effect is not seen, continued administration is viable. Compared to the profuse sweating induced by Mahuang Tang, there is indeed a difference.
Furthermore, Taiyang disease distinguishes between Wind damaging Wei and Cold damaging Ying, prescribing Guizhi and Mahuang methods respectively. This theory originated with Xu Yixue. Fang Xingzhong of the late Ming Dynasty and Yu Jiayan, Cheng Jiaoqian of the Qing Dynasty followed this view. Only Ke Yunbo argued that Guizhi Tang, for anyone with headache, fever, aversion to wind/cold, floating-weak pulse, and spontaneous sweating, regardless of meridian involvement or whether it is Wind-Strike, Cold damage, or miscellaneous disease, can be used to induce sweat. If mistaken sweating or purging fails to resolve the exterior, Guizhi should still be used to resolve the muscle layer. Inferring Ke's intent, he likely noted that Zhang Zhongjing applied Guizhi Tang across various meridians frequently, thus supporting this generalization. However, upon careful examination of the Classic text: regarding the passage "Cold damage, after sweating resolves, half a day later restlessness returns, pulse floating and rapid, can induce sweat again, Guizhi Tang is indicated," Ke likely used this to argue Cold damage also suits Guizhi. But the text mentions Cold damage was treated with sweating (implying Mahuang Tang previously). Half a day later restlessness returns, pulse turns floating-rapid. This indicates that after sweating, external Wind pathogens are easily attacked, while internal Ying Qi is already injured. Restlessness stems from Heart disturbance; rapid pulse indicates Yin deficiency. How can one bear further administration of Mahuang? The switch to Guizhi is not because Taiyang Cold damage suits Guizhi, but because post-sweating restlessness with floating-rapid pulse specifically suits Guizhi. Regarding Yangming disease also using Guizhi: "Yangming disease, slow pulse, profuse sweating, slight aversion to cold, exterior unresolved, can induce sweat, Guizhi Tang is indicated." Yangming disease typically involves profuse sweating but aversion to heat, not cold. Current slight aversion to cold indicates Taiyang exterior syndrome has not resolved. Urgently, one must draw the pathogen out via Taiyang. This is not Yangming disease suiting Guizhi, but Taiyang exterior unresolved specifically suiting Guizhi. Furthermore, the subsequent text states: "Yangming disease, floating pulse, no sweating, wheezing, inducing sweat leads to recovery, Mahuang Tang is indicated." Comparing these two passages, one must know that when pathogens enter Yangming from Taiyang, observe if they came from Taiyang Wind-Strike with unresolved Wind-Strike patterns; treat according to Wind-Strike methods. If from Taiyang Cold damage with unresolved Cold damage patterns; treat according to Cold damage methods. This further confirms Guizhi and Mahuang dividing responsibilities for Wind-Strike and Cold damage as natural, unchangeable rules. The Three Yin meridians have no precedent for sweating methods. Although Taiyin disease has a clause for sweating due to floating pulse, it is not that Taiyin disease suits Guizhi. Rather, floating pulse warrants sweating, and the Shaoyao, Shengjiang, and Dazao in this formula can help stabilize Taiyin. If one claims that after mistaken sweating/purging with unresolved exterior, Guizhi should be used to resolve muscle layer: consider what constitutes mistaken sweating. It precisely refers to using Mahuang for Guizhi patterns or Guizhi for Mahuang patterns. Moreover, after sweating, Guizhi Tang should not be reused. After purging, Guizhi Tang should not be reused. Zhang Zhongjing sets explicit prohibitions. Cases where Guizhi is suitable after mistaken purging require observing floating pulse and rebellious Qi rising. Only then can it be given. Otherwise, do not give it. Zhang Zhongjing's text is clear and easy to understand. If following Ke's interpretation, one seeks confusion amidst diversions, increasing disorder, leaving later students without direction. Since Wind-Cold pathogens enter via Taiyang, Taiyang is the first step for scholars of Cold Damage. Unclear origins lead to errors from the start. I therefore do not hesitate to cite the Classic to directly dispel confusion, ensuring clinical prescription has certainty and avoids chaos.
Furthermore: Guizhi Tang was established for early Taiyang disease, but may be suitable even after prolonged duration, provided exterior symptoms remain unresolved. Ke's categorization of mistaken sweating and purging cannot be lumped together; they must be distinguished. After mistaken sweating, variations like Yang collapse and wind leakage occur, requiring specific rescue formulas. Although Zhang Zhongjing mentions "Severe purging in Cold damage followed by sweating, epigastric fullness, aversion to wind, exterior unresolved, do not attack fullness, must first resolve exterior," this is because the fullness resulted from mistaken purging, and exterior unresolved status was identified via aversion to cold. Thus, exterior must be resolved first before attacking fullness. There is no other explicit text regarding reusing Guizhi after sweating. For complex exterior-interior pathogens requiring interior-first treatment: if diarrhea with undigested food, abdominal fullness, body pain exist, interior urgency exceeds exterior slowness. Must first warm the interior, then attack the exterior. Wait until diarrhea stops but body pain persists, then consider harmonizing the exterior. Exterior resolution still relies on Guizhi methods. The variations and changes herein possess profound principles. One must familiarize oneself with the Classic during study and carefully analyze pulse and symptoms clinically. Then, among 113 formulas, none will be misused. Why only Guizhi?
Furthermore: Guizhi is indeed the principal formula for Taiyang. Rescue methods derived from this formula vary significantly whether adding or subtracting one herb. Merely adjusting dosages in the original formula creates new names with distinct therapeutic targets. For example, adding Gui (Cinnamon Bark) to this formula creates Guizhi Jia Gui Tang (Cinnamon Twig Plus Cinnamon Bark Decoction); heavily increasing Shaoyao creates Guizhi Jia Shaoyao Tang (Cinnamon Twig Plus White Peony Root Decoction), etc. Each requires separate explanation, appended after this formula, with this formula serving as the ancestral source. Hence, it heads the list of 113 formulas.