(附东垣三焦论)
或有以马玄台《难经正义》问于生生子曰∶马氏谓《难经》所言三焦,乃上中下之三焦,故曰无
形之气;若于手少阳之三焦,乃是有形,引《灵枢》、《素问》
经旨及东垣等论为证。而以手厥阴配合,俱寓诊于右尺。子以其说为何如?幸条悉之,以诏来学。生生子
曰∶马玄台搜究经旨甚博,考证诸篇极工致、非苦心者不能也。但谓三焦有二,上中下之三焦,行脉道以
通十二经,手少阳之三焦,惟司决渎之职而已。谓东垣能疑之,而不能正之。又引《三因方》谓脂膜如手
掌大者为三焦,而寓诊于右尺。斯言不能无弊,何也?上古文本,不容易看,亦有不可强解者,亦非聪明所
可臆度,不可辩者宁缺之,不敢妄议,恐增后人一障也,姑即所疑,条陈于左,以俟明哲。
马氏曰∶手少阳三焦,焦、当作 ,是有形物也。上中下之三焦,焦字从火,谓能腐熟水谷变化也。余
按“焦”字亦不一,《灵枢·背 篇》有云∶肺 在三焦之间,心 在五焦之间。据铜人图,肺 在三椎
下,心俞在五椎下,是以“焦”字作“椎”字看也。椎、槌也,节也。斯上中下之三焦,亦是以地段三停
而言,如云上中下三节也。“焦”“ ”同用,如“藏”“脏”同用也,不必拘从火从肉,但观上下文义何
如尔。推马氏之意,不过谓从肉则是有形,从火则是无形,盖为有形无形生疑也。
马氏曰∶《三因方》云∶古人左为肾脏,其府膀胱,
右为命门,其府三焦,三焦有脂膜如手大。且曰∶宋有举子徐遁者,医疗有精思,曰∶齐尝大饥,
群丐相脔而食,有一人皮肉尽而骨脉全者,视其五脏,见右肾之下有脂膜如手大者,正与膀胱相对
,有二白脉自其中出,夹脊而上贯脑,意此即导引家所谓夹脊双关者,而不悟脂膜如手大者之为
三焦也,由是知三焦为有形也(按导引家夹脊双关,正是两肾,非别有物也)。愚谓此言无稽,不
必信也。盖医以《灵》、《素》为宗,《灵》、《素》不载,如张仲景、华佗、王叔和、孙思邈,皆擅名
古今者,未有一言及此。史载秦越人隔垣洞见人脏腑者,假令三焦如手掌大,何不言之,而反曰无形
之气。又观手少阳经起止散络,亦无夹脊贯脑之说,独陈无择言之,岂无择之神知,出《灵》、《素》诸
公之上,而操议以胜之哉,愚故谓无稽之言,不必信也,余惟人身禀赋,有肥瘠,有长短,有男作女形
,女作男形,脏腑亦有浓薄之不一。人脏内景,殆与猪相类,两肾即两腰子,两腰子皆裹于脂膜之中间
,或有偏长短者,不可因脂膜之垂长者,便指为脏腑也。两白脉自中出者,正肾之脉络尔。膀胱中处腹下
,亦非偏于左者,抑何相对若是之偶耶?据云大饥而相脔,安有舍美肾而不食,尚从容乎有所待也,此
不待辩而可知。若脂膜左右长短不同,由人之肥瘠也。且如平人之胆,仅藏汁三合,姜维之胆大如斗。
平人喉管二,一通气,一通食。铜人图有载
大贼欧希范之喉管有三。彼陈无择者,抑信之否乎?三焦既有形若是,铜人图必图而表之,华氏内照图
亦必表而出之。何一阳曰∶世传华佗神目,置人裸形于日中,洞见其脏腑,是以象图,俾后人准之,为论
治规范。三国时杀人亦不少,华佗之医,不可谓无精思,岂有三焦如是,乃遗而不之载哉!何一阳又曰∶
余先年精力时,以医从师征南,历剖贼腹,考验脏腑,心大长于豕心,而顶平不尖,大小肠与豕无异,惟
小肠上多红花纹,膀胱真是脬之室,余皆如《难经》所云,亦无所谓脂膜如手掌大者。余谓心小肠属火,
故色皆赤,三焦亦属火,色独如脂膜,是不可信矣。顾戴同父氏有言曰∶《三因方》之好异也,云三焦有
形如脂膜,附于肾夹脊,若果如是,则《内经》、《难经》言之矣,其经脉又何偏属历络之云乎?《医学
辩疑俗断》极叱其非,惜乎人未之考也(徐遁之说出《龙川志》,而陈无择因之,且引《难经》男子藏精、
女子系胞二句于夹脊贯脑之下,是认命门为三焦也,差舛如此,何可信哉!《黄帝阴符经》有曰∶二肾内
生白脉二条,上涌朝元,通灵阳之宫,迹此观之,舛可知矣)。
或曰∶子以《难经》三焦无形之言为是,何《灵枢·本脏篇》皆谓有浓、薄、缓、急、直、结、纵、
横,惟其有形,乃有此语。余曰∶《本脏篇》论三焦者,非特为三焦有物如是也,浓、薄、直、结、缓、急
等语,为膀胱而言也。合通篇脏腑配应而观,其义自见。
据五脏各有一腑为应,三焦为孤腑(上中下三焦同号为孤腑),又为外府,又为中渎之府。按渎者,
水也。膀胱为津液之府,津液亦水也。三焦为决渎之官,膀胱之用也,又为肾间原气之使,以其无形
,故附膀胱而言之。何以然,“黄帝曰∶愿闻六腑之应?岐伯答曰∶肺合大肠,大肠者,皮其应。
心合小肠,小肠者,脉其应。肝合胆,胆者,筋其应。脾合胃,胃者,肉其应。肾合三焦膀胱,三焦
膀胱者,腠理毫毛其应。帝曰∶应之奈何?岐伯曰∶肺应皮,皮浓者,大肠浓,皮薄者,大肠薄”云
云。“肾应骨,密理浓皮者,三焦膀胱浓,粗理薄皮者,三焦膀胱薄,疏腠理者,三焦膀胱缓,皮急
而无毫毛者,三焦膀胱急,毫毛美而粗者,三焦膀胱直,稀毫毛者,三焦膀胱结也”。三焦原非五行正府,
而无所应,故称外府、孤府,因帝以六腑之应为问,三焦既为膀胱之用,原气之使,故以膀胱合而应之
,以答六腑之应如此也。又《本输篇》曰∶“肺合大肠,大肠者,传导之府。心合小肠,小肠者,受盛
之府。肝合胆,胆者,中精之府。脾合胃,胃者,五谷之府。肾合膀胱,膀胱者,津液之府。”此五脏
五腑五行正配合者也。独少阳三焦无合,乃复曰“少阳属肾,肾上连肺,故将两脏。三焦者,中渎之府,
水道出焉,属膀胱,是孤之府也(《千金方》论孤府亦同)。是六腑之所与合者”。合二篇观之,三焦
属肾与膀胱,故附膀胱而言,非为三
焦有物如是也。《论勇篇》之纵横及诸篇言有形者多类此。彼陈无择之脂膜,果有理疏理密直结纵
横也乎哉?无择之好异,而故为之辞也。
泰来曰∶观五腑皆有合有应,惟三焦无合无应,因下焦为
足太阳所管摄,故称足三焦。足三焦者,足太阳之别络也,非另有一个足三焦也。据云中渎之府,水
道出焉,属膀胱,是孤之府等语,即知诸言有形者,皆是言膀胱,以膀胱乃下焦之地位,膀胱主水,
三焦职司决水,故并言之。
或曰∶三焦既无形如此,何《气府篇》有少阳脉气所发者三十二穴,《缪刺篇》有少阳之络,《经
脉篇》有三焦少阳之脉,《经别篇》有少阳心主之正,《经筋篇》有少阳心主之筋,《卫气篇》有少阳
心主之本,《阴阳二十五人篇》言手少阳之上,血气盛则眉美而长等语,似涉有形,今曰无形,然则彼皆
非耶?余曰∶所谓有形者,指其经根据附各属经络而流贯者言也,盖手少阳乃十二经中之一经,其动脉原有
起止,亦有脉络经筋俞穴出入相应。以经络乎上中下一身也,非谓无其经脉而虚作一气看也。因有此经,
故有此病。云无形者,指其府也,以其无特形,故称外府,非若五府称赤肠白肠黄肠青肠黑肠,长若干,
重若干,受盛若干云云。若
独指其经脉起止俞穴主病等语,便谓是有形之府,不思奇经中如冲、任、督等脉,皆有起止,
亦皆主病,冲为血海,任主胞胎,亦可指冲任等脉如有形府例看否耶?!有形之说,不必辩而
其谬自明矣。
马氏曰,东垣《此事难知》问三焦有几,似尝究心于此者,惜乎谓三焦有二者,不及上中下
之三焦,则误矣,是欲阐《内经》而《内经》之义未融,欲正《难经》而《难经》之言仍在也。
余曰∶《此事难知》乃王好古所着,好古为东垣高弟,问三焦有几者,非为手少阳三焦当分上中
下为二也,是欲人知三焦有手足之分尔。手少阳三焦主持于上,足三焦主持于下。足三焦者,足
太阳膀胱之别也,若将手少阳三焦又分出一个上中下三焦,合足三焦观之,得无有三个三焦耶?
则凿矣。好古此篇,分三焦甚有功,但谓命门包络于右尺同诊,又谓包络亦有三焦之称,为命门之
火游行于五脏六腑之间,主持于内也云云,似亦未究相火命门之义。《难经》虽有命门之说,未
尝言其为火,观“男子以藏精”一句,则知右肾非火矣。矧《经》曰∶精者,水也。又曰∶“其
气与肾通”,水与火可相混耶?都缘惑于高阳生《脉诀》,以三焦配命门,而张世贤图难经脉诀,
又以心包络皆混配命门三焦于右尺,故有命门属火之说。何一阳《医
学统宗》极劾其盗袭讹言,紊陈图局,诬世钓誉。夫命门,乃两肾中间动气,人之生命所司,故
曰“精神之所舍,原气之所系”。观铜人图图命门穴于两肾俞中间,深为得旨。
泰来曰∶三焦总只一而已,言手三焦者,以其经属手少阳,又其治在膻中,缘手经经乎上也。
言足三焦者,以其经即足太阳之别络,又其治在气冲,缘足经经乎下也。《灵》、《素》以下焦备六
腑之数,即知手、少阳三焦与下焦之三焦总只一而已。
马玄台曰∶命门之脉不必拘于右尺,以其气与肾通也。顾肾间动气,人之生命,左肾亦可以诊之。据
其将右肾入左尺同诊者,是要出右尺部位,庶三焦包络始有诊地也。又欲使人知是前人之意,故托言
王叔和《脉诀》歌云∶“右肺大肠脾胃命”,由是以三焦包络寓诊于右尺也。愚谓玄台博究如此,岂有
不识《脉诀》非叔和书哉!正若三焦、包络二脉无所归着,不得已而引《脉诀》歌为证,仍称王叔和之
名者,不过要使人尊信也。抑不思叔和《脉经》,寸关尺之诊,上部合于上焦,关部合于中焦,尺部合
于下焦,两尺皆以肾为候,而无三焦、包络左右之分;《千金方》载列亦同。今人不体认《脉诀》之非,
往往为其牵缚,又强扶而合之,亦大可叹也!戴同父《脉诀刊误》首篇辟之甚详,真千载断案,读之亥豕
自见,毋用多喙。
马氏谓心火面北,君道也,故居寸上;相火面南,臣道也,故居尺下;三焦、包络,皆属相火,
故寓于右尺下部诊之。余曰∶此强合之辞也。人多不思相火命名之义,往往以阴火作相火看,故《溯洄
集》辩之。包络乃护心之脂膜,不离于心,膻中、气海、三焦之所布,皆在膈上,与心相近,故称曰
相火,以其为君火之相也。余窃谓相,犹宰相辅成君德,位必相近,今马氏以三焦、包络二脉诊法部位
无所着落,是为诊法部位而言,非为君臣尊卑定南北也。论定分,则君臣尊卑有南北;论诊法,则部位
之居有远近,势也,亦理也。包络之护心,与宰相之近君一也。若将包络居尺下,则与心远矣,世岂有远
离于君而谓之相哉?此又可以例观矣。且《经》谓上以候上,下以候下者,均此理势也。按《洪范》五行
,火曰炎上,水曰润下。《难经》亦曰∶火炎上而不能下,故在上部,水流下行而不能上,故在下部。今
以南北尊卑之势紊而使居下部,岂不背经义哉!徒拘拘以君臣尊卑而言,则肺亦臣也,《经》曰∶“肺者
,心之盖也”,抑何反加于心之上耶?盖肺相傅之官,位近心君,故治节由之,是以同处于膈上也。观
《素问》三焦、包络,皆处膻中,盖“膻中者,臣使之官,喜乐出焉”。以近心君,故喜乐由之。又三
焦为气父,包络为血母,从心肺而言也,以心主血,肺主气,皆居膈上,故曰膻中之分,父母居之
,气之海也,是故不得而居于右尺下部也。谢坚白《难经本旨》,亦推宗《脉经》,谓手厥阴即手
少阴心脉,同部三焦脉,上见寸口,中见于关,下焦与肾同诊。此其说殊合经旨,千古不易之定论也。
或曰∶三焦下合右肾,子以其说然欤否欤?余曰∶此启玄子引《正理论》之言,不知何所据,
遍考《灵》、《素》,只有“上合手心主”一句,无下合右肾之说。或曰∶然则与手心主配合为表里者
何也?余曰∶手少阳三焦之脉,布膻中,散络心包。手厥阴心主之脉,出属心包络,下膈历络三焦,
因其脉上下交络故也。又俱属手经,均为相火,以类相从,虽为表里,终非五脏五腑比也。此何以故?
余曰∶为是非也,盖藏有声色臭味,府有出纳受盛,二经无声色臭味、出纳受盛,虽是表里,实非脏腑
比也。《素问》运气篇曰∶“心包非脏也,三焦非腑也”。余故曰以类相从也。
或曰∶马氏谓上中下之三焦,行脉道以通十二经,手少阳之三焦,惟司决渎之职而已,予以为非耶
?余曰∶噫嘻!人之好异也,经书岂容易言哉!圭斋欧阳公曰∶
《难经》先秦古文,盖为医式之祖也。东坡苏公曰∶医之《难经》,句句皆理,字字皆法,后世达
者,神而明之,如珠走 ,如 走珠,无不可者,若出新意,而弃旧学,以为无用,非愚无知,则
狂而已。看书之法,当以意会其理而融其辞,不可执己见以害其意。夫所谓三焦者,乃上焦、中焦、
(附东垣三焦论)
有人拿着马玄台的《难经正义》来问生生子说:马氏认为《难经》所说的三焦,是指上、中、下三个部位的三焦,所以说是无形的“气”;而手少阳经的三焦,则是有形的实体。他引用《灵枢》、《素问》的经典宗旨以及李东垣等人的论述作为证据,并将手厥阴心包络与之配合,都将脉诊部位寄托在右尺部。您觉得他的说法怎么样?希望您能逐条详细解答,以教导后来的学者。
生生子回答说:马玄台搜求探究经典宗旨非常广博,考证各个篇章极其工整细致,不是苦心钻研的人是做不到的。但是他说三焦有两种:上、中、下的三焦,运行脉道以贯通十二经脉;手少阳的三焦,只负责疏通水道的职责罢了。又说李东垣能够怀疑这一点,但不能纠正它。又引用《三因方》的说法,认为像手掌大小的脂膜就是三焦,并将脉诊寄托在右尺部。这种说法不能没有弊端,为什么呢?上古的文字深奥,不容易看懂,也有不可强行解释的地方,并不是聪明人就可以随意揣测的。对于无法辩驳的内容宁可省略,不敢妄加议论,恐怕给后人增加障碍。姑且就其中的疑问,逐条陈述如下,以等待明智者的指正。
马氏说:手少阳三焦,“焦”字应当写作“膲”,是有形之物。上、中、下的三焦,“焦”字从火,指能够腐熟水谷、变化精微。
我按:“焦”字的用法也不止一种,《灵枢·背腧篇》中有这样的话:肺俞在三焦之间,心俞在五焦之间。根据铜人针灸图,肺俞在第三椎骨下,心俞在第五椎骨下,因此这里的“焦”字应看作“椎”字。椎,就是槌,指节段。所以上、中、下的三焦,也是以地段分为三等来说的,就像说上、中、下三节一样。“焦”和“膲”通用,就像“藏”和“脏”通用一样,不必拘泥于从火还是从肉,只要看上下文的意思如何罢了。推测马氏的本意,不过是认为从肉字旁就是有形的,从火字旁就是无形的,大概是因为对“有形”与“无形”产生了疑惑。
马氏说:《三因方》记载:古人认为左边是肾脏,其腑为膀胱;右边是命门,其腑为三焦,三焦有像手掌大小的脂膜。并且说:宋代有一个叫徐遁的举子,医疗技术精巧深思,他说:我曾经遇到大饥荒,一群乞丐互相割肉吃,有一个人皮肉都吃光了只剩骨骼脉络的,观察他的五脏,看见右肾下面有像手掌大小的脂膜,正好与膀胱相对,有两根白脉从中出来,夹着脊柱向上贯穿大脑,心想这就是导引家所说的“夹脊双关”,却没有意识到那像手掌大小的脂膜就是三焦,由此知道三焦是有形的。(按:导引家所说的夹脊双关,正是两肾,并非另有物体。)我认为这种说法毫无根据,不必相信。
因为医学以《灵枢》、《素问》为宗,这两本书没有记载,像张仲景、华佗、王叔和、孙思邈这样在古今享有盛名的人,也没有一句话提到这个。史书记载秦越人(扁鹊)隔着墙能看清人的脏腑,假如三焦像手掌那么大,为什么不提呢,反而说它是无形的“气”。再看手少阳经的起止和散络分布,也没有夹脊贯脑的说法,唯独陈无择这样说,难道陈无择的神知超出了《灵枢》、《素问》各位先贤之上,凭借议论胜过他们吗?所以我认为是无稽之谈,不必相信。我只认为人身禀赋,有肥瘦之分,有长短之别,有男作女形、女作男形的情况,脏腑也有厚薄的不一致。人体内脏的内部景象,大概与猪相似,两肾就是两个腰子,两个腰子都包裹在脂膜的中间,或许有偏长偏短的,不能因为脂膜垂挂较长,就把它指认为脏腑。那两根白脉从中出来,正是肾的脉络而已。膀胱位于腹部下方正中,也不是偏左边的,为什么说是相对得如此巧合呢?据说是大饥荒时互相割食,哪有舍弃美味的肾脏不吃,还从容地有所期待的呢?这不用辩驳就可以知道。如果脂膜左右长短不同,是由人的肥瘦决定的。况且如正常人的胆,仅容纳汁液三合,姜维的胆大如斗。正常人喉管有两个,一个通气,一个通食物。铜人针灸图上有记载大贼欧希范的喉管有三个。那个陈无择,难道相信这些吗?如果三焦真的像那样有形,铜人针灸图必定会绘制并标示出来,华氏内照图也一定会表露出来。何一阳说:世上传闻华佗有神目,把人裸体放在阳光下,能洞见其脏腑,因此画出图像,让后人作为准则,成为论治的规范。三国时期杀人也不少,华佗的医术不能说没有精思,难道三焦是这样,却遗漏不记载吗!何一阳又说:我年轻时精力充沛时,跟随老师征讨南方,多次剖开盗贼的肚子,检验脏腑,发现心脏比猪心大很多,而且顶部平坦不尖,大小肠与猪没有区别,只是小肠上面多有红花纹,膀胱真是尿脬的室,其余都像《难经》所说的那样,也没有所谓像手掌大的脂膜。我认为心和小肠属火,所以颜色都是红的,三焦也属火,颜色却像脂膜,这是不可信的。顾戴同父氏有话说:《三因方》喜欢标新立异,说三焦有形像脂膜,附着在肾旁夹脊,如果真的这样,《内经》、《难经》早就说过了,它的经脉又怎么会偏重于“历络”(散布联络)的说法呢?《医学辩疑俗断》极力斥责它的错误,可惜人们没有考察过。(徐遁的说法出自《龙川志》,陈无择沿袭了它,并且引用《难经》中“男子藏精、女子系胞”两句放在“夹脊贯脑”之下,是把命门认作三焦了,差错如此之大,怎么可信呢!《黄帝阴符经》说:两肾内生两条白脉,向上涌向朝元宫,通灵阳之宫,据此看来,差错可以知道了)。
有人说:您认为《难经》说三焦无形是对的,为什么《灵枢·本脏篇》都说有三焦的浓、薄、缓、急、直、结、纵、横?只有是有形的,才会有这些话。
我说:《本脏篇》讨论三焦,并不是特指三焦有物体是这样的,浓、薄、直、结、缓、急等词语,是为膀胱说的。结合全篇脏腑配应的意义来看,道理自然显现。
根据五脏各有一个腑相配合,三焦是孤腑(上、中、下三焦同号为孤腑),又是外府,又是中渎之府。按:渎,是水。膀胱是津液之府,津液也是水。三焦是决渎之官,是膀胱的作用,又是肾间原气的使者,因为它无形,所以依附膀胱来说明。为什么这样?“黄帝说:愿闻六腑的对应关系?岐伯回答说:肺合大肠,大肠,皮是其应。心合小肠,小肠,脉是其应。肝合胆,胆,筋是其应。脾合胃,胃,肉是其应。肾合三焦膀胱,三焦膀胱,腠理毫毛是其应。帝说:对应的情况是怎样的?岐伯说:肺应皮,皮厚的,大肠也厚,皮薄的,大肠也薄”等等。“肾应骨,纹理细密皮厚的,三焦膀胱也厚,纹理粗糙皮薄的,三焦膀胱也薄,腠理疏松的,三焦膀胱也缓,皮肤紧张而没有毫毛的,三焦膀胱也急,毫毛美观粗壮的,三焦膀胱也直,毫毛稀疏的,三焦膀胱也结”。三焦本来不是五行正腑,也没有特定的形体对应,所以称为外府、孤腑,因为皇帝问的是六腑的对应,三焦既然是膀胱的作用,原气的使者,所以将膀胱合并起来回答它,以此回答六腑的对应关系。另外《本输篇》说:“肺合大肠,大肠,传导之府。心合小肠,小肠,受盛之府。肝合胆,胆,中精之府。脾合胃,胃,五谷之府。肾合膀胱,膀胱,津液之府。”这是五脏五腑五行正配合的。唯独少阳三焦没有配合,却又说“少阳属肾,肾上连肺,所以统领两脏。三焦,是中渎之府,水道由此而出,属于膀胱,是孤之府”(《千金方》论述孤腑也相同)。这是六腑所配合的对象”。结合两篇来看,三焦属肾与膀胱,所以依附膀胱来说,并不是说三焦有物体是这样的。《论勇篇》中的纵横以及其他篇目说有形的情况大多类似于此。那个陈无择的脂膜,真的有纹理疏密、直结纵横吗?陈无择喜欢标新立异,故意为此找借口。
泰来说:看五腑都有配合和对应,唯独三焦没有配合和对应,因为下焦由足太阳经管辖摄持,所以称足三焦。足三焦,是足太阳的别络,并不是另外有一个足三焦。根据“中渎之府,水道出焉,属膀胱,是孤之府”等话语,就知道所有说有形的,都是在说膀胱,因为膀胱乃下焦的地位,膀胱主水,三焦职司决水,所以并而言之。
有人说:三焦既然无形像这样,为什么《气府篇》有少阳脉气所发的三十二个穴位,《缪刺篇》有少阳的络脉,《经脉篇》有三焦少阳的经脉,《经别篇》有少阳心主的正经,《经筋篇》有少阳心主的筋,《卫气篇》有少阳心主的根本,《阴阳二十五人篇》说手少阳之上,血气旺盛则眉毛美而长等话,似乎涉及有形,现在说无形,那么那些都不是吗?
我说:所谓有形,是指其经络依据附着在各所属经络而流贯的情况而言的。盖手少阳是十二经中的一经,其动脉原有起止,也有脉络经筋俞穴出入相应。通过经络贯通上中下一身,并不是说没有其经脉而虚作一气来看待。因为有此经,所以有此病。说无形,是指其腑而言,因为它没有特定的形状,所以称为外府,不像五府称为赤肠、白肠、黄肠、青肠、黑肠,长若干,重若干,受盛若干等等。如果单独指着其经脉起止、俞穴主病等话语,就说是有形之腑,不想想奇经中如冲、任、督等脉,都有起止,也都主病,冲为血海,任主胞胎,也可以指着冲任等脉如有形之腑的例子来看吗?!有形的说法,不必辩驳,其谬误自然明显。
马氏说,李东垣《此事难知》问三焦有几个,似乎曾经用心研究过这个,可惜他说三焦有两个,不及上、中、下的三焦,那就错了,这是想要阐发《内经》但《内经》的意义未融通,想要纠正《难经》但《难经》的话仍在。
我说:《此事难知》是王好古所著,好古是东垣的高徒,问三焦有几个,并不是为了把手少阳三焦分成上、中、下为二,是想让人知道三焦有手、足之分。手少阳三焦主持于上,足三焦主持于下。足三焦,是足太阳膀胱的别络,如果将手少阳三焦又分出一个上、中、下三焦,结合足三焦来看,岂不是有三个三焦了吗?那就牵强了。好古这篇,区分三焦很有功劳,但说命门包络在右尺同诊,又说包络也有三焦之称,为命门的火游行于五脏六腑之间,主持于内等等,似乎也没有深入研究相火命门的意义。《难经》虽然有命门的说法,未曾说它是火,看“男子以藏精”一句,就知道右肾不是火了。何况《经》说:精,是水。又说:“其气与肾通”,水与火可以混淆吗?都是因为被高阳生的《脉诀》迷惑,把三焦配命门,而张世贤图解难经脉诀,又把心包络都混配命门三焦于右尺,所以有了命门属火的说法。何一阳《医学统宗》极力弹劾他盗袭讹言,扰乱陈旧的图局,欺骗世人钓取声誉。夫命门,乃是两肾中间的动气,是人生命的主宰,所以说“精神之所舍,原气之所系”。看铜人针灸图将命门穴画在两肾俞中间,深得旨意。
泰来说:三焦总共只有一个,说手三焦,是因为其经属于手少阳,又因为它的治理在膻中,缘于手经行于上。说足三焦,是因为其经即足太阳的别络,又因为它的治理在气冲,缘于足经行于下。《灵枢》、《素问》以下焦备六腑之数,就知道手少阳三焦与下焦的三焦总共只有一个。
马玄台说:命门的脉不必拘泥于右尺,因为其气与肾相通。然而肾间动气,是人的生命,左肾也可以诊察。根据他将右肾纳入左尺同诊,是要空出右尺的部位,以便三焦包络才有诊察的地方。又想让人知道这是前人的意思,所以托言王叔和《脉诀》歌云:“右肺大肠脾胃命”,由此将三焦包络寓诊于右尺。我认为玄台如此博览究研,难道不认识《脉诀》不是叔和写的吗!正是因为三焦、包络二脉无处归着,不得已才引用《脉诀》歌作为证据,仍称王叔和之名,不过是要使人尊信罢了。又不想想叔和《脉经》,寸关尺的诊法,上部合于上焦,关部合于中焦,尺部合于下焦,两尺都以肾为候,而没有三焦、包络左右之分;《千金方》记载列也相同。现在的人不体认《脉诀》的错误,往往被其束缚,又强行扶持而合之,也很可叹啊!戴同父《脉诀刊误》首篇辟斥得很详细,真是千古断案,读之亥豕自见,不用多嘴。
马氏说心火面北,君道,所以居寸上;相火面南,臣道,所以居尺下;三焦、包络,都属相火,所以寓于右尺下部诊之。我说:这是强行拼凑的言辞。人们多不思相火命名的意义,往往以阴火作相火看,所以《溯洄集》对此进行辩驳。包络乃是护心的脂膜,不离于心,膻中、气海、三焦之所布,都在膈上,与心相近,所以称为相火,因为它是君火的辅佐。我私下认为,相,犹如宰相辅成君德,位置必然相近,现在马氏因为三焦、包络二脉诊法部位无处着落,是为了诊法部位而言,不是为了君臣尊卑定南北。论定分,则君臣尊卑有南北;论诊法,则部位的居所有远近,是形势,也是道理。包络护心,与宰相近君是一样的。如果把包络居尺下,那就与心远了,世上哪有远离君主而称之为相的吗?这又可以类推了。且《经》说上以候上,下以候下者,均此理势。按《洪范》五行,火曰炎上,水曰润下。《难经》也说:火炎上而不能下,所以在上部,水流下行而不能上,所以在下部。现在以南北尊卑的形势混乱而使居下部,岂不违背经义吗!仅仅拘泥于君臣尊卑而言,那么肺也是臣,《经》说:“肺者,心之盖也”,为何反而加在心之上呢?盖肺是相傅之官,位近心君,所以治节由此产生,因此同处于膈上也。看《素问》三焦、包络,都处膻中,盖“膻中者,臣使之官,喜乐出焉”。因为近心君,所以喜乐由此产生。又三焦为气父,包络为血母,从心肺而言,因为心主血,肺主气,都居膈上,所以说膻中之分,父母居之,是气之海,所以不得居于右尺下部。谢坚白《难经本旨》,也推崇宗奉《脉经》,谓手厥阴即手少阴心脉,同部三焦脉,上见于寸口,中见于关,下焦与肾同诊。这种说法特别符合经旨,是千古不易的定论。
有人说:三焦下合右肾,您认为这种说法对吗?我说:这是启玄子引用《正理论》的话,不知有什么依据,遍考《灵枢》、《素问》,只有“上合手心主”一句,没有下合右肾的说法。有人说:那么与手心主配合为表里的是什么?我说:手少阳三焦的脉,布散在膻中,散布联络心包。手厥阴心主的脉,出属心包络,下膈历络三焦,因为它们的脉上下交络的缘故。又都属于手经,均为相火,以类相从,虽然是表里,终究不同于五脏五腑。这是什么原因?我说:因为它们是非脏腑。盖脏有声色臭味,腑有出纳受盛,这两经无声色臭味、出纳受盛,虽然是表里,实在不同于脏腑。《素问》运气篇说:“心包非脏也,三焦非腑也”。所以我说是以类相从。
有人说:马氏说上、中、下的三焦,运行脉道以贯通十二经,手少阳的三焦,只负责决渎的职责罢了,我认为不对?
我说:唉!人们喜好标新立异,经书哪里容易言说!圭斋欧阳公说:《难经》是先秦古文,大概是医式的祖源。东坡苏公说:医家的《难经》,句句皆理,字字皆法,后世通达的人,神而明之,如珠走盘,如盘走珠,没有不可以的,如果出新意,而弃旧学,以为无用,不是愚昧无知,就是狂妄罢了。看书的方法,应当以意会其理而融其辞,不可执己见以害其意。所谓三焦,乃是上焦、中焦、
(Attached: Dongyuan's Discourse on the Sanjiao)
Someone asked Shengshengzi, holding Ma Xuantai's *Zhengyi Nanjing* (Correct Interpretation of the Classic of Difficulties): "Ma asserts that the Sanjiao mentioned in the *Nanjing* refers to the Upper, Middle, and Lower Sanjiao; therefore, it is described as formless Qi. However, the Sanjiao of the Hand-Shaoyang meridian is a tangible entity. He cites the principles of the *Lingshu* (Spiritual Pivot) and *Suwen* (Basic Questions), as well as discourses by Li Dongyuan and others, as evidence. Furthermore, he pairs it with the Hand-Jueyin pericardium, locating the pulse diagnosis for both at the Right Chi position. What is your opinion on his theory? I pray you will detail your response to instruct future students."
Shengshengzi replied: "Ma Xuantai has extensively investigated the classic principles and meticulously verified various chapters; such diligence cannot be achieved without profound effort. However, his assertion that there are two types of Sanjiao—the Upper, Middle, and Lower Sanjiao which circulate through meridians to connect the Twelve Channels, and the Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao which solely manages the function of draining waterways—is problematic. He claims that Li Dongyuan could doubt this but failed to correct it. He further cites the *Sanyin Fang* (Formulas of Three Causes), stating that a piece of fatty membrane the size of a hand constitutes the Sanjiao, and locates its pulse diagnosis at the Right Chi position. This statement contains flaws. Why? Ancient texts are profound and difficult to interpret; some matters cannot be forced into explanation, nor can they be guessed by cleverness alone. Where arguments cannot be resolved, it is better to omit them than to speculate rashly, lest one create obstacles for future generations. I shall briefly address these doubts item by item below, awaiting the judgment of the wise.
Ma states: 'In Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao, the character Jiao (焦) should be written as Jiao (膲), indicating a tangible object. In the Upper, Middle, and Lower Sanjiao, the character Jiao (焦) derives from Fire, referring to the ability to rot and ripen food and transform essences.'
I observe: The usage of the character Jiao varies. The *Lingshu · Back-Shu Points* states: 'The Lung Shu is located between the third Jiao, and the Heart Shu is located between the fifth Jiao.' According to the Bronze Man acupuncture chart, the Lung Shu is below the third vertebra, and the Heart Shu is below the fifth vertebra. Thus, here 'Jiao' should be read as 'Zhui' (椎, vertebra). Zhui means mallet or segment. Therefore, the Upper, Middle, and Lower Sanjiao refer to the body divided into three sections, similar to speaking of upper, middle, and lower segments. 'Jiao' and 'Jiao' are used interchangeably, just as 'Zang' and 'Zang' are interchangeable. One need not rigidly adhere to the radical of Fire versus Flesh; one should simply consider the context. Speculating on Ma's intent, he likely believes that the flesh radical implies tangibility, while the fire radical implies formlessness, arising from confusion regarding 'tangible' versus 'formless'.
Ma states: 'The *Sanyin Fang* records: The ancients considered the left side as the Kidney, with its paired organ being the Bladder; the right side as the Mingmen (Gate of Life), with its paired organ being the Sanjiao. The Sanjiao possesses a fatty membrane the size of a hand. It also states: During the Song Dynasty, a scholar named Xu Dun possessed refined medical insight. He said: "During a great famine, beggars ate each other’s flesh. One individual was reduced to bones and meridians. Observing his viscera, I saw a fatty membrane the size of a hand beneath the right kidney, directly opposite the Bladder. Two white meridians emerged from it, running along the spine and penetrating the brain. I thought this was what Qigong practitioners call the 'Double Passages along the Spine,' but failed to realize that this fatty membrane was the Sanjiao. Thus, I knew the Sanjiao is tangible."' (Note: The 'Double Passages along the Spine' referred to by Qigong practitioners are precisely the two Kidneys, not a separate entity.) I consider this claim baseless and unworthy of belief.
Medicine takes the *Lingshu* and *Suwen* as its authority. These texts do not record such a thing. Figures renowned throughout history such as Zhang Zhongjing, Hua Tuo, Wang Shuhe, and Sun Simiao never mentioned it. Historical records state that Qin Yueren (Bian Que) could see internal organs through walls. If the Sanjiao were as large as a hand, why would he not mention it, but instead describe it as formless Qi? Furthermore, examining the course and collateral connections of the Hand-Shaoyang meridian reveals no mention of passing along the spine to the brain. Only Chen Wuye makes such a claim. Did Chen Wuye possess divine knowledge surpassing the authors of the *Lingshu* and *Suwen*, prevailing through argumentation? I therefore deem it baseless and unworthy of belief. I only assert that human constitutions vary in fatness and leanness, length and shortness, and even gender characteristics may invert. Visceral structures also vary in thickness. The internal anatomy of humans is likely similar to pigs. The two Kidneys are merely two kidneys, enclosed within fatty membranes. Some may be longer or shorter on one side; one must not identify a hanging fatty membrane as a visceral organ. The two white meridians emerging from the center are indeed the renal vessels. The Bladder is located centrally in the lower abdomen, not偏 (biased) to the left. How can it be described as 'opposite' in such an偶 (coincidental) manner? Regarding the famine where people ate each other, who would spare the delicious kidneys and wait calmly? This is evident without debate. Variations in the length of fatty membranes on left and right are due to human fatness or leanness. For instance, a normal person’s gallbladder holds only three he of juice, whereas Jiang Wei’s gallbladder was as large as a bushel. Normal people have two tracheae, one for air and one for food. The Bronze Man chart records that the rebel Ou Xifan had three tracheae. Does Chen Wuye believe these anomalies? If the Sanjiao were truly tangible as described, it would certainly be depicted in the Bronze Man chart and Huashi Neizhao Tu (Huashi’s Internal Illumination Diagram). He Yiyang stated: 'Legend has it that Hua Tuo had divine vision, placing naked individuals in sunlight to see their organs clearly, thus creating diagrams for posterity as standards for treatment. There were many killings in the Three Kingdoms period; Hua Tuo’s medical skill was undoubtedly refined. Would he omit the Sanjiao if it existed as described?' He Yiyang also said: 'In my youth, accompanying my teacher on southern campaigns, I dissected rebels’ abdomens to examine viscera. I found the heart significantly larger than a pig’s heart, with a flat top rather than pointed. The small and large intestines were identical to pigs’, except for red floral patterns on the small intestine. The bladder was truly the chamber of the urinary sac. Everything else matched the *Nanjing*. There was no mention of a fatty membrane the size of a hand.' I argue that the Heart and Small Intestine belong to Fire, hence their red color. The Sanjiao also belongs to Fire, yet its color resembles fatty membrane; this is unbelievable. Gu Daifushi commented: 'The *Sanyin Fang* loves novelty, claiming the Sanjiao is tangible like a fatty membrane attached beside the kidneys near the spine. If true, the *Neijing* and *Nanjing* would have stated it. Why then speak of meridians dispersing and connecting? The *Yixue Bianyi Suduan* (Medical Doubts Clarified) strongly condemns this error, unfortunately few have investigated it.' (Xu Dun’s account comes from *Longchuan Zhi*, which Chen Wuye adopted, citing *Nanjing* phrases about men storing essence and women linking to the womb under 'passing along the spine to the brain', confusing Mingmen with Sanjiao. Such errors make it unreliable! The *Huangdi Yinfu Jing* states: 'Two white meridians arise from within the two kidneys, surging upward...'. Based on this, the error is clear.)
Some ask: 'You accept the *Nanjing*'s statement that the Sanjiao is formless. Why does the *Lingshu · Benzang Pian* (Chapter on Original Viscera) discuss its thickness, thinness, laxity, tension, straightness, knotting, longitudinal, and transverse nature? Only tangible things exhibit these qualities.'
I reply: When the *Benzang Pian* discusses the Sanjiao, it does not mean the Sanjiao itself is a tangible object with these physical traits. Terms like thick, thin, straight, knotted, lax, and tense refer to the Bladder. Viewing the entire chapter’s correspondence between zang and fu organs clarifies the meaning.
Each of the five Zang organs has a corresponding Fu organ. The Sanjiao is the 'Lonely Fu' (Gu Fu)—the Upper, Middle, and Lower Sanjiao share this title—and also the 'External Fu' and 'Middle Du Fu'. 'Du' means water channel. The Bladder is the Fu of Body Fluids, and fluids are water. The Sanjiao is the Official of Drainage, functioning via the Bladder, and is the messenger of Yuan Qi between the Kidneys. Because it is formless, it is discussed in relation to the Bladder. Why? 'The Yellow Emperor asked: I wish to hear about the correspondences of the six Fu organs. Qibo answered: The Lung connects with the Large Intestine; the skin corresponds to the Large Intestine. The Heart connects with the Small Intestine; the vessels correspond to the Small Intestine. The Liver connects with the Gallbladder; the sinews correspond to the Gallbladder. The Spleen connects with the Stomach; the muscles correspond to the Stomach. The Kidney connects with the Sanjiao and Bladder; the interstices and body hair correspond to the Sanjiao and Bladder. The Emperor asked: How does this correspondence work? Qibo said: The Lung corresponds to the skin. Thick skin indicates a thick Large Intestine; thin skin indicates a thin Large Intestine...' etc. 'The Kidney corresponds to bone. Fine texture and thick skin indicate a thick Sanjiao and Bladder; coarse texture and thin skin indicate a thin Sanjiao and Bladder; loose interstices indicate a lax Sanjiao and Bladder; tight skin without body hair indicates a tense Sanjiao and Bladder; beautiful and coarse body hair indicates a straight Sanjiao and Bladder; sparse body hair indicates a knotted Sanjiao and Bladder.' The Sanjiao is originally not one of the Five Elemental standard Fu organs and lacks specific correspondence, hence called External Fu and Lonely Fu. Since the Emperor asked about the six Fu correspondences, and the Sanjiao functions with the Bladder and conveys Yuan Qi, it is grouped with the Bladder to answer the question. Additionally, the *Benshu Pian* states: 'The Lung connects with the Large Intestine, the Fu of Conduction. The Heart connects with the Small Intestine, the Fu of Reception. The Liver connects with the Gallbladder, the Fu of Refined Essence. The Spleen connects with the Stomach, the Fu of Five Grains. The Kidney connects with the Bladder, the Fu of Body Fluids.' These are the standard pairings of the Five Zang and Five Fu. Only the Shaoyang Sanjiao lacks a pairing, yet it says: 'Shaoyang belongs to the Kidney; the Kidney connects upward to the Lung, thus governing two Zang organs. The Sanjiao is the Fu of Middle Draining, where water pathways emerge, belonging to the Bladder; it is the Lonely Fu' (The *Qianjin Fang* agrees on the Lonely Fu). This describes the pairing of the six Fu organs. Reading both chapters together, the Sanjiao belongs to the Kidney and Bladder, so it is discussed in relation to the Bladder, not because the Sanjiao itself is a tangible object. Cases of 'tangibility' in the *Lun Yong Pian* and other chapters are similar. Does Chen Wuye’s fatty membrane truly possess textures of density, straightness, knotting, etc.? Chen Wuye loved novelty and fabricated excuses.
Tailai said: Observing that the five Fu organs all have pairings and correspondences, while the Sanjiao has neither, because the Lower Jiao is governed by the Foot-Taiyang meridian, it is called Foot-Sanjiao. Foot-Sanjiao is the branch collateral of Foot-Taiyang, not a separate entity. From statements like 'Fu of Middle Draining, water pathways emerge, belonging to the Bladder, the Lonely Fu,' we know that all mentions of tangibility refer to the Bladder. The Bladder occupies the position of the Lower Jiao, governs water, and the Sanjiao manages water drainage; thus, they are mentioned together.
Some ask: 'If the Sanjiao is formless, why does the *Qifu Pian* list 32 acupoints where Shaoyang qi emerges? Why does the *Miuci Pian* mention Shaoyang collaterals, the *Jingmai Pian* Shaoyang meridians, the *Jingbie Pian* Shaoyang-Centralis regular meridians, the *Jingjin Pian* Shaoyang-Centralis sinews, the *Wei Qi Pian* Shaoyang-Centralis roots, and the *Yinyang Ershiwu Ren Pian* discuss how abundant blood and qi in the Hand-Shaoyang result in long, beautiful eyebrows? These seem to imply tangibility. Yet you say it is formless. Are these incorrect?'
I reply: By 'tangible,' it refers to the meridians flowing and circulating according to their attachments and pathways. The Hand-Shaoyang is one of the Twelve Meridians; its arterial pulses have origins and endings, and its collaterals, sinews, and acupoints interact correspondingly. Through meridians, it traverses the upper, middle, and lower body. It is not treated as empty Qi devoid of meridians. Because this meridian exists, diseases associated with it occur. Saying it is 'formless' refers to its Fu organ status; lacking a specific shape, it is called the External Fu. Unlike the five Fu organs described as Red Intestine, White Intestine, etc., with specific lengths, weights, and capacities. If one points to the origins, endings, acupoints, and disease manifestations of the meridians and claims the Fu is tangible, one fails to consider that the Extraordinary Vessels like Chong, Ren, and Du also have origins, endings, and disease manifestations. The Chong is the Sea of Blood, and the Ren governs conception. Can one view the Chong and Ren vessels as tangible Fu organs by analogy?! The theory of tangibility needs no debate; its fallacy is self-evident.
Ma states: 'In Dongyuan’s *Cishi Nanzhi* (Difficulties of This Matter), asking how many Sanjiaos there are suggests he studied this. Alas, saying there are two Sanjiaos, excluding the Upper, Middle, and Lower, is erroneous. He sought to elucidate the *Neijing* but failed to integrate its meaning, and sought to correct the *Nanjing* but retained its words.'
I reply: *Cishi Nanzhi* was written by Wang Haogu, a senior disciple of Dongyuan. Asking how many Sanjiaos exist was not to divide the Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao into Upper, Middle, and Lower as two entities, but to teach that the Sanjiao has Hand and Foot distinctions. Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao governs the upper, Foot-Sanjiao governs the lower. Foot-Sanjiao is the branch of Foot-Taiyang Bladder. If one divides Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao into Upper, Middle, and Lower again, combining it with Foot-Sanjiao, wouldn't that result in three Sanjiaos? That would be far-fetched. Haogu’s distinction of the Sanjiao is valuable, but his claim that Mingmen and Pericardium are diagnosed together at the Right Chi, and that Pericardium is also called Sanjiao, serving as the Fire of Mingmen circulating among the five Zang and six Fu organs, shows he did not thoroughly investigate the meaning of Minister Fire and Mingmen. Although the *Nanjing* mentions Mingmen, it never defines it as Fire. The phrase 'Men store essence' indicates the right Kidney is not Fire. Moreover, the Classics state: 'Essence is Water.' And: 'Its qi communicates with the Kidney.' Can Water and Fire be confused? This stems from confusion caused by Gao Yangsheng’s *Maijue* (Pulse Rhymes), which pairs Sanjiao with Mingmen. Zhang Shixian’s diagram of the *Nanjing* Pulse Rhymes further conflated Pericardium and Sanjiao with Mingmen at the Right Chi, leading to the theory that Mingmen belongs to Fire. He Yiyang’s *Yixue Tongzong* severely criticized this plagiarism of errors and disruption of traditional charts, accusing him of deceiving the world for fame. Mingmen is the moving Qi between the two Kidneys, governing life, hence 'the residence of Spirit and Essence, the root of Yuan Qi.' The Bronze Man chart places the Mingmen acupoint between the two Kidney Shu points, capturing the essence correctly.
Tailai said: The Sanjiao is ultimately one. When called Hand-Sanjiao, it is because its meridian belongs to Hand-Shaoyang, and its governance is in Danzhong, as hand meridians traverse the upper body. When called Foot-Sanjiao, it is because its meridian is the branch of Foot-Taiyang, and its governance is in Qichong, as foot meridians traverse the lower body. The *Lingshu* and *Suwen* include the Lower Jiao in the count of six Fu organs; thus, Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao and Lower Jiao Sanjiao are ultimately one.
Ma Xuantai said: The pulse of Mingmen need not be confined to the Right Chi, as its qi communicates with the Kidney. However, the moving Qi between the Kidneys is life; the Left Kidney can also be diagnosed. By including the right Kidney in the Left Chi diagnosis, he seeks to vacate the Right Chi position so that Sanjiao and Pericardium have a diagnostic location. He also wished to attribute this to predecessors, quoting Wang Shuhe’s *Maijue*: 'Right: Lung, Large Intestine, Spleen, Stomach, Mingmen,' thereby placing Sanjiao and Pericardium diagnosis at the Right Chi. I argue that Xuantai, so erudite, surely knows the *Maijue* is not by Shuhe! Precisely because the Sanjiao and Pericardium meridials lacked a proper location, he reluctantly cited the *Maijue* and invoked Wang Shuhe’s name to gain credibility. He failed to consider that in Shuhe’s *Maijing* (Pulse Classic), Cun, Guan, and Chi correspond to Upper, Middle, and Lower Jiao respectively; both Chi positions monitor the Kidney, with no left-right distinction for Sanjiao or Pericardium. The *Qianjin Fang* records this similarly. Modern practitioners fail to recognize the error in the *Maijue*, often bound by it and forcing alignments, which is lamentable. Dai Tongfu’s *Maijue Kanwu* refutes this in detail in its first chapter, a verdict for millennia; reading it reveals the errors plainly. No need for further words.
Ma states: Heart Fire faces North, representing the Sovereign’s way, thus located at the Cun (upper); Minister Fire faces South, representing the Minister’s way, thus located at the Chi (lower). Sanjiao and Pericardium both belong to Minister Fire, hence diagnosed at the lower part of the Right Chi. I reply: This is forced reasoning. People often misunderstand the naming of Minister Fire, confusing Yin Fire with Minister Fire, which the *Suhui Ji* addresses. The Pericardium is the fatty membrane protecting the Heart, inseparable from it. Danzhong, Qihai, and the distribution of Sanjiao are all above the diaphragm, close to the Heart, hence called Minister Fire, as it assists Sovereign Fire. Privately, I consider 'Minister' akin to a Chancellor assisting the Sovereign’s virtue; their positions must be close. Now, Ma places the Sanjiao and Pericardium pulse diagnoses at the Chi because they lack a location, arguing for diagnostic positions, not for establishing North/South based on Sovereign/Minister hierarchy. When discussing rank, Sovereign and Minister have North/South distinctions; when discussing diagnostics, locations have proximity, which is natural law and principle. The Pericardium protecting the Heart is like the Chancellor being close to the Sovereign. Placing the Pericardium at the Chi distances it from the Heart; can one call something a Minister if it is distant from the Sovereign? This analogy applies elsewhere. Also, the Classics state 'Upper monitors Upper, Lower monitors Lower,' following this logic. According to *Hongfan* Five Elements, Fire flares upward, Water moistens downward. The *Nanjing* also says: 'Fire flares up and cannot descend, hence located in the upper; Water flows down and cannot ascend, hence located in the lower.' Now, disrupting this with North/South hierarchical forces to place them in the lower contradicts classical meaning! Clinging solely to Sovereign/Minister hierarchy, the Lung is also a Minister. The Classics say: 'The Lung is the canopy of the Heart.' Why is it placed above the Heart? The Lung is the Officer of Assistance, close to the Heart Sovereign, thus regulating Qi, sharing the same location above the diaphragm. The *Suwen* states Sanjiao and Pericardium are in Danzhong. 'Danzhong is the Officer of Attendants, where joy and pleasure emerge.' Being close to the Heart Sovereign, joy arises from it. Sanjiao is the Father of Qi, Pericardium the Mother of Blood, relative to Heart and Lung. Heart governs Blood, Lung governs Qi; both reside above the diaphragm. Thus, Danzhong is divided, with Parents residing there, the Sea of Qi, so it cannot be located at the lower Right Chi. Xie Jianbai’s *Nanjing Benzhi* also follows the *Maijing*, stating Hand-Jueyin is the Hand-Shaoyin Heart pulse, sharing the position with Sanjiao pulse, appearing at Cun, Guan, and Lower Jiao diagnosed with Kidney. This aligns perfectly with classical intent, an unchangeable eternal truth.
Some ask: 'The Sanjiao connects inferiorly to the Right Kidney. Do you agree?' I reply: This is Qixuanzi citing *Zhengli Lun*, unknown basis. Scanning *Lingshu* and *Suwen*, only 'Connects superiorly with Hand-Centralis' appears; no mention of connecting inferiorly to the Right Kidney. Someone asks: 'Then what pairs with Hand-Centralis as interior-exterior?' I reply: The Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao meridian spreads in Danzhong and collaterals the Pericardium. The Hand-Jueyin Centralis meridian emerges, belongs to Pericardium, descends through diaphragm, and collaterals Sanjiao. Due to their intersecting pathways, they pair. Both are Hand meridians, both are Minister Fire, associating by type. Though interior-exterior, they differ from the Five Zang-Fu pairs. Why? Because they are non-Zang/Fu. Zang have sound, color, odor, taste; Fu have intake, output, reception, storage. These two meridians lack these attributes. Though interior-exterior, they are not like Zang-Fu. The *Suwen · Yunqi Pian* states: 'Pericardium is not a Zang; Sanjiao is not a Fu.' Hence, I say they associate by type.
Some ask: 'Ma states the Upper, Middle, Lower Sanjiao circulates through meridians to connect the Twelve Channels, while Hand-Shaoyang Sanjiao only manages drainage. I disagree.'
I reply: Alas! People love novelty. Can Classics be easily questioned? Ouyang Xiu said: '*Nanjing* is pre-Qin ancient text, the ancestor of medical models.' Su Shi said: 'In medical *Nanjing*, every sentence is reason, every word is method. Those who understand spiritually illuminate it, like pearls rolling on a plate, nothing is impossible. To propose new ideas while rejecting old learning as useless is either ignorance or madness.' The method of reading is to comprehend the principle through intent and merge the language, not to let personal views harm the meaning. The so-called Sanjiao is the Upper Jiao, Middle Jiao,