丹溪曰读前人之书当知其立言之意苟不知其意求适于用不可得也痘疮之论钱氏为详历举
源流
明经络分表里虚实开其治法证以论辨深得着书垂教之体使后人如求方圆于规矩较平直于准绳
引而伸之触类而长之可谓无穷之应用也今人不知致病之因不求立方之意仓卒一试设有不应并
其书而弃之近因局方之学行素问之道不明类皆喜温而恶凉喜补而恶解利忽得陈氏方论遂以为
钱氏不及也虽然陈氏亦可谓善求病情者大率归重于太阴一经盖以手太阴属肺主皮毛足太阴属
脾主手足肺金恶寒而易于外感脾土恶湿而无物不受观其用丁香官桂所以治肺之寒用附木半夏
所以治脾之湿也使脾与肺果有寒与湿而兼有虚也中病则已何伤之有今徒见其出迟者身热者泄
利者惊悸者气急者渴思饮者例与木香散异功散者间有偶中之效不思一偏之祸若钱氏方固未尝
废细辛丁香白术参 辈率有监制辅佐之药但有寒凉者多而补助一法略尔端绪痴人不可说梦钱
氏之虑深矣亦将俟达者推充而用之夫渴者用温药痒塌者用补药自陈氏发之迥出前辈然其多用
燥
热或未适中恐其立方之际必有挟寒而痘者余尝会诸家之粹而用之聊陈一二从子六七岁时出痘
身热微渴自利或欲用木香散加丁香十粒煎予观其出迟固因其自利而气弱察其所下皆臭滞因热
蒸而下恐未必寒急止之已投一帖矣与黄连解毒汤加白术近十帖以解之利止痘出其后肌常微热
手
足生痈又与凉剂补一月安一人年七十岁发热而昏倦其脉大而似数与参 归术陈皮大料浓汤饮
之二十帖痘出又二十帖脓胞成身无全肤或欲用陈氏本方与之予曰但虚无寒也又与前方至六十
帖而安至正甲申春邑间痘疮不越一家率与陈氏方童幼死者百余虽曰天数吾恐人事亦或未之尽
也
谨按钱氏论痘疮形色轻重困剧而用药已具其端绪矣至洁古又辨所兼之证及候音声察形气
为病
而处治治法可谓详悉但世俗不深求其意反有疑似丹溪先生所以言之谍谍也大抵世俗喜温而恶
凉将
钱氏之法不去推充至多疑似如云不可妄下盖妄之一字戒慎之意当有可下之理也若疮疹初发有
因里实而出不快渴而脉数便秘烦躁不下可乎有将恹之际里实而渴便秘身热不下可乎或云首尾
俱不可下或指为上吐下泻不可下皆非也但自病体虚实不等时令中治法之异要当适中病情尔故
钱氏云看时月此句关系甚妙如冬月盛寒便难例用凉剂且小儿痘疮本五脏之毒所发非止属诸痛
痒疮皆出心火之比故陈氏方一出亦多获效今人用钱氏方亦有致误者盖不善用其法之过非制法
者之过也宜求乎立方本旨矧岁气时临灾青浅深不同小儿体有虚实之异用药不可轻举详洁古以
微下法中佐以风剂是兼升发之意亦慎之也何热剂与香窜之药岂可例用乎然有毒入关窍肌骨间
邪气下陷用此而获生者或有之恐千百而一二也
丹溪说:阅读前人的著作,应当了解他们立论的意图。如果不知道他们的意图,想要使治疗适宜于临床运用,是不可能做到的。关于痘疮的论述,钱乙(钱氏)最为详尽。他历数痘疮的源流,阐明经络,分辨表里虚实,开启治疗方法,通过证候进行辨析,深得著书立说、垂范后人的体例,使得后人如同在规矩中求方圆、在准绳上较平直一样,引申发挥,触类旁通,可谓应用无穷。
如今的人不知道致病的病因,不探究处方用药的本意,仓促尝试一次,如果有不对症的情况,就连同书籍一起抛弃。近来因为《局方》(《太平惠民和剂局方》)之学盛行,《素问》(《黄帝内经·素问》)的道理不明,人们大多喜欢温补而厌恶清凉,喜欢补益而厌恶疏解利导。偶然得到陈氏(陈文中)的方论,就认为钱氏不如陈氏。
虽然陈氏也可以说是善于探求病情的人,但他大体上将重点归于太阴经。盖因手太阴肺经属肺,主皮毛;足太阴脾经属脾,主四肢。肺金恶寒而易受外感,脾土恶湿而无物不受。观察他使用丁香、官桂来治疗肺之寒,使用附子、木香、半夏来治疗脾之湿。如果脾与肺确实有寒湿且兼有虚损,药中病机也就罢了,有什么伤害呢?
如今只看到那些出痘迟缓、身体发热、泄泻、惊悸、气急、口渴想喝水的患者,一律使用木香散或异功散,偶尔有巧合中的效果,却不思考偏执一端的祸害。至于钱氏的方剂,其实并未废弃,其中细辛、丁香、白术、人参等药物,往往都有监制、辅助的药物配合。只是钱氏方中寒凉药较多,而补助一法略微开端而已。对愚钝之人不可说梦话,钱氏的思虑深远了,也将等待通达之士去推广使用它。
凡是口渴的用温药,瘙痒塌陷的用补药,这是从陈氏开始提出的,迥然超出前辈。然而他多用燥热之药,未必适中。恐怕他在立方之际,必定有挟带寒邪而发痘的情况。我曾汇集诸家精华而加以运用,姑且陈述一二。
我的侄子六七岁时出痘,身体发热,轻微口渴,自发性腹泻。有人想用木香散加十粒丁香煎服。我观察他出痘迟缓,固然因为他腹泻导致气弱,但察看他所下的粪便皆臭秽滞涩,是因热蒸腾而下,恐怕未必是寒证。急忙制止,此时已投了一帖温药。于是给予黄连解毒汤加白术,将近十帖以解除热毒。腹泻停止,痘疹发出。此后肌肤常微热,手足生痈,又给予凉剂调理一个月才安定。
有一人七十岁,发热而昏倦,脉象大而似数。给予人参、当归、白术、陈皮大料浓汤饮用,二十帖后痘疹发出,又二十帖后脓疱形成,全身皮肤无完好之处。有人想用陈氏的本方给他,我说:“只有虚无寒。”继续给予前方,至六十帖才痊愈。
至正甲申年春天,县境内痘疮流行,没有一家幸免。大家都用陈氏的方子,童幼死者百余。虽然说是天数,但我恐怕人事也未尽全力啊。
谨按:钱氏论述痘疮的形色轻重困剧,以及用药已具端绪。至洁古(张元素/洁古老人)又辨别所兼之证及候音声,察形气为病而处治,治疗方法可谓详细完备。但世俗之人不深究其意,反而产生疑似误解,所以丹溪先生喋喋不休地谈论此事。
大体上世俗之人喜欢温补而厌恶清凉,将钱氏的方法不去推演扩充,以至于产生许多疑似误解。例如说“不可妄下”,这“妄”字含有戒慎之意,应当有可下的道理。如果疮疹初发,有因里实而出痘不快,口渴、脉数、便秘、烦躁,不下之可以吗?有将愈之际,里实而渴、便秘、身热,不下之可以吗?有人说首尾都不可下,或指为上吐下泻不可下,都不对。只要根据病体虚实不等、时令中治法的差异,要当适中病情即可。
所以钱氏说“看时月”,这句话关系非常微妙。如冬月盛寒,便难以例用凉剂。况且小儿痘疮本是五脏之毒所发,并非仅仅属于“诸痛痒疮,皆属于心火”之比。所以陈氏方一出也多有获效。今人用钱氏方也有导致失误的,这是不善于运用其方法的过错,不是制定方法者的过错。应当探求立方的本旨。何况岁气时令不同,灾青深浅各异,小儿体质有虚实之异,用药不可轻举妄动。参考洁古以微下法中佐以风剂,是兼有升发之意,也是谨慎的表现。那么热剂与香窜之药,岂可一概使用呢?然而有毒邪入关窍肌骨间,邪气下陷,用此法而获生的,或许有,恐怕千百人中仅得一二人吧。
Danxi stated: When reading the works of predecessors, one must understand their intent in formulating theories. If one does not comprehend their intent, it is impossible to apply them appropriately in clinical practice. Regarding the discussion on smallpox (dou chuang), Qian Yi (Qian Shi) provided the most detailed account. He enumerated the origins and evolution, clarified the meridians, differentiated exterior and interior, deficiency and excess, and opened up treatment methods. By analyzing syndromes through differentiation, he embodied the spirit of writing for instruction, allowing later generations to seek precision as one seeks squares and circles from compasses and set-squares, or measures straightness with a plumb line. By extending these principles and applying them by analogy, their application can be infinite.
However, contemporary practitioners do not understand the causes of disease nor the rationale behind prescription formulation. After a hasty trial, if the treatment fails, they discard both the patient's condition and the books themselves. Recently, due to the prevalence of the *Ju Fang* (Formulary of the Bureau of People's Welfare and Medical Relief) school and the neglect of the principles of the *Su Wen* (Basic Questions of the Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon), people generally prefer warming and tonifying while disliking cooling and purgative/drainage methods. Upon encountering the formulas and discussions of Chen Shi (Chen Wenzhong), they concluded that Qian Shi was inferior.
Although Chen Shi can indeed be considered skilled at discerning pathological conditions, his approach largely emphasizes the Taiyin channels. The Hand Taiyin Lung channel belongs to the Lung, which governs the skin and hair; the Foot Taiyin Spleen channel belongs to the Spleen, which governs the four limbs. Metal of the Lung dislikes cold and is prone to external contraction; Earth of the Spleen dislikes dampness and accepts all influences. Observing his use of Ding Xiang (Caryophylli Flos, Clove) and Guan Gui (Cinnamomi Ramulus, Cinnamon Twig) to treat Lung cold, and Fu Zi (Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata, Prepared Aconite Root), Mu Xiang (Aucklandiae Radix, Aucklandia Root), and Ban Xia (Pinelliae Rhizoma, Pinellia Tuber) to treat Spleen dampness: if the Spleen and Lung truly possess cold and dampness accompanied by deficiency, and the medicine hits the target, what harm would there be?
Nowadays, people merely observe patients with delayed eruption, fever, diarrhea, palpitations, shortness of breath, and thirst craving drinks, and uniformly administer Mu Xiang San (Aucklandia Powder) or Yi Gong San (Yi Gong Powder). Occasionally, there are coincidental successes, but they fail to consider the disaster of bias. As for Qian Shi's prescriptions, they were never abandoned; herbs such as Xi Xin (Asari Radix et Rhizoma, Asarum Root), Ding Xiang, Bai Zhu (Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma, Atractylodes Rhizome), and Ren Shen (Ginseng Radix, Ginseng Root) often included supervising and assisting agents. However, Qian Shi's formulas contained more cooling herbs, and the method of tonification was only slightly initiated. One cannot speak dreams to the foolish; Qian Shi's foresight was profound, waiting for those who understand to expand upon its use.
The principle of using warming medicines for thirst and tonifying medicines for itching and collapse was pioneered by Chen Shi, surpassing previous generations. However, his frequent use of drying and heating herbs may not always be appropriate. It is likely that when formulating his prescriptions, he accounted for cases complicated by cold pathogens. I have synthesized the essence of various schools and applied it, briefly stating a few examples.
When my nephew was six or seven years old, he developed smallpox with mild fever, slight thirst, and spontaneous diarrhea. Someone suggested using Mu Xiang San with ten grains of Ding Xiang decocted. I observed that his eruption was delayed; while this was partly due to Qi deficiency from diarrhea, examination of his stool revealed foul, stagnant feces caused by heat steaming downward, suggesting it was likely not a cold pattern. I urgently stopped the previous dose, although one packet had already been administered. Instead, I prescribed Huang Lian Jie Du Tang (Coptis Decoction for Resolving Toxins) with added Bai Zhu for nearly ten doses to resolve the heat. The diarrhea ceased, and the rash erupted. Subsequently, his skin remained slightly warm, and abscesses formed on his hands and feet. I then administered cooling formulas for another month until he stabilized.
A seventy-year-old man presented with fever, confusion, and fatigue. His pulse was large and seemingly rapid. I prescribed a strong decoction of Ren Shen, Dang Gui (Angelicae Sinensis Radix, Dong Quai Root), Bai Zhu, and Chen Pi (Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium, Tangerine Peel). After twenty doses, the rash erupted; after another twenty doses, pustules formed, leaving no intact skin on his body. Someone wished to use Chen Shi's original formula, but I said, "There is only deficiency, no cold." I continued with the previous formula, and he recovered after sixty doses.
In the spring of Jiashen year during the Zhizheng era, smallpox ravaged the county, affecting every household. Most used Chen Shi's formulas, resulting in over a hundred deaths among children and infants. Although this may be attributed to heavenly fate, I fear human efforts were also insufficient.
Commentary: Qian Shi's discussion on the appearance, severity, and critical nature of smallpox, along with medication strategies, laid the groundwork. Zhi Jiegu (Zhang Yuansu/Jiegu Old Man) further differentiated accompanying syndromes, listened to voice and respiration, examined physical constitution to diagnose illness, and determined treatments, making the methods quite comprehensive. However, laypeople do not deeply explore the underlying logic, leading to ambiguity and misunderstanding, which is why Danxi spoke so extensively.
Generally, the public prefers warming and dislikes cooling. Failing to expand upon Qian Shi's methods leads to numerous misconceptions. For instance, the statement "do not recklessly purge" contains a warning against imprudence; there should be indications for purging. If early in the eruption, the cause is internal excess leading to slow eruption, accompanied by thirst, rapid pulse, constipation, and irritability, is purging inappropriate? If near resolution, internal excess persists with thirst, constipation, and fever, is purging inappropriate? Some claim purging is forbidden at both onset and end, or specifically for vomiting and diarrhea, which is incorrect. Treatment must be balanced according to the patient's deficiency/excess and seasonal variations.
Thus, Qian Shi's remark to "observe the season" is crucial. In deep winter cold, it is difficult to uniformly apply cooling formulas. Moreover, pediatric smallpox originates from toxins of the five zang organs, not merely falling under the category of "all pain, itching, and sores belong to Heart fire." Therefore, Chen Shi's formulas also achieved many successes. Contemporary errors using Qian Shi's formulas stem from improper application, not flaws in the original methods. One should seek the original intent of the prescriptions. Furthermore, annual qi and seasonal changes vary in depth and severity, and children's constitutions differ in deficiency and excess; medication should not be undertaken lightly. Referencing Jiegu, who combined mild purgation with wind-dispersing agents to incorporate ascending and dispersing intentions, shows caution. How then can heating agents and aromatic penetrating drugs be used indiscriminately? While there may be rare cases where toxic pathogens sink into orifices and muscles/bones, and such methods save lives, this might occur in only one or two out of a thousand cases.