十三科有两说∶大方家说寒一、内二、喉三、目四、疡五、伤六、金镞七、女八、儿九
、痘
疹十、针灸十一、祝由十二、符禁十三。明王肯堂《证治准绳》、近王晋三《古方选注》皆
如此。祝由家说并符禁于祝由,另立风科以足其数。考祝由无不用符禁者,符禁安得别为
一
科?中风之病千头万绪,自应另立,不可与内科混。且内科者,主饮食、起居、房室、情志
之病,而中风之邪自外致,不自内生,不得属之内科。《史·扁鹊传》扁鹊至洛阳,贵小儿
,即为小儿医;至邯郸,贵妇,即为带下医;至周,贵老人,即为耳目痹医。夫耳目痹医
,即风科也。则风科之自为一科也,由来旧矣。
注家皆谓马刀为疮,形长如马刀蛤。然经文与侠缨对举,侠缨以部位名,而马刀以形似
名,俪语不类。马刀当亦部位之名,与侠缨相近。大约是颈侧 肉,在耳之下,而略近于后
,下当
肩井之上,揣之曲肖马刀者。颈侧 肉之名马刀,犹掌侧白肉之名鱼乎!取于物为假,亦古
命名之例。夫生于侠缨之处曰侠缨,则生于马刀之处曰马刀。经之对举,义当如此。《千金
》九 篇以马刀 、马刀肩肿二症,与掖下肿、吻伤、四肢不举、喉痹、天牖中肿等,作一
例文法。掖下、吻、肢等既是部位,则马刀可推。其尤着者,“马刀肩肿”四字,谓马刀与
肩俱肿也。以《千金》证《金匮》,决然已。若疮形之长者,则与圆者何别,而必提出言之
?且侠缨之疮未必无长,颈掖之疮未必尽长,又何以别之?详经意不问长否,苟生于颈侧 肉
间,总谓之马刀而已矣。
此篇专明《金匮》之马刀,若执是以概近世方书则否。愿用近世书者,勿引《金匮》也
。自记。
十三科有两种说法:大方家的说法是寒一、内二、喉三、目四、疡五、伤六、金镞七、女八、儿九、痘疹十、针灸十一、祝由十二、符禁十三。明代王肯堂的《证治准绳》和近代王晋三的《古方选注》都是这样说的。祝由家的说法是将符禁合并到祝由中,另外设立风科来补足数量。考证祝由术没有不使用符禁的,符禁怎么能单独作为一科呢?中风病千头万绪,自然应该单独设立,不能与内科混淆。而且内科主要主管饮食、起居、房室、情志方面的疾病,而中风的邪气是从外部侵入的,不是从内部产生的,不得归属于内科。《史记·扁鹊传》记载扁鹊来到洛阳,当地尊重小儿医,他就做小儿医;来到邯郸,当地尊重妇女,他就做带下医(妇科医生);来到周地,当地尊重老人,他就做耳目痹医。那耳目痹医,就是风科。那么风科独立成为一科,由来已久。
注释家都认为马刀是疮,形状像马刀蛤一样长。然而经文将马刀与侠缨对举,侠缨是以部位命名,而马刀是以形状相似命名,这种对偶句式不协调。马刀也应当是部位的名称,与侠缨相近。大约是颈侧的肌肉,在耳朵下方,略微靠近后方,下方正当肩井穴之上,触摸起来很像马刀的。颈侧肌肉命名为马刀,就像手掌侧白色肌肉命名为鱼际一样!取物名进行比喻,也是古代命名的惯例。生于侠缨部位的就叫侠缨,那么生于马刀部位的就叫马刀。经文中的对举,意义应当如此。《千金方》第九篇将马刀、马刀肩肿两个症状,与腋下肿、吻伤、四肢不能举起、喉痹、天牖中肿等,作为同一类文章写法。腋下、吻、肢体等既然是部位,那么马刀也可以推断出来。其中特别显著的是,“马刀肩肿”四个字,意思是马刀部位与肩部都肿胀了。用《千金方》的记载来印证《金匮要略》,可以确定无疑了。如果是疮的形状长,那么与圆的有什么区别,而一定要提出来讲呢?而且侠缨部位的疮未必没有长的,颈腋部位的疮未必全是长的,又凭什么来区分它们呢?详细考察经文的意旨,不问是否长,只要生在颈侧肌肉之间,总称为马刀罢了。
这一篇专门阐明《金匮要略》中的马刀,如果执着于此来概括近世的方书,那就错了。希望使用近世书籍的人,不要引用《金匮要略》。自己记述。
There are two theories regarding the "Thirteen Departments" (Shisan Ke): The theory of the Great Physicians states: Cold [diseases] 1, Internal [medicine] 2, Throat 3, Eyes 4, Sores/Ulcers 5, Trauma 6, Arrowheads/Metal injuries 7, Women's [medicine] 8, Children's [medicine] 9, Smallpox and Rashes 10, Acupuncture and Moxibustion 11, Incantations (Zhuyou) 12, Talismans and Prohibitions (Fujin) 13. Wang Kentang's *Zhengzhi Zhunsheng* from the Ming Dynasty and Wang Jinshan's *Gufang Xuanzhu* from recent times both adopt this view. The theory of the Zhuyou school combines Talismans and Prohibitions into Zhuyou, and separately establishes a Wind Department to make up the number. Research shows that Zhuyou invariably uses Talismans and Prohibitions; how can Talismans and Prohibitions be separated as an independent department? Stroke (Zhongfeng) is complex with myriad manifestations and should naturally be established as a separate department, not mixed with Internal Medicine. Moreover, Internal Medicine primarily governs diseases related to diet, daily life, sexual activity, and emotions, whereas the pathogenic factors of stroke come from external invasion, not generated internally, so they cannot belong to Internal Medicine. The *Records of the Grand Historian · Biography of Bian Que* records that when Bian Que arrived in Luoyang, where children were respected, he became a pediatrician; when he arrived in Handan, where women were respected, he became a gynecologist (Daixia Yi); when he arrived in Zhou, where the elderly were respected, he became an ophthalmologist and neurologist for Bi syndrome. That ophthalmologist and neurologist for Bi syndrome is essentially the Wind Department. Thus, the Wind Department being independent has been the case since ancient times.
Commentators all assert that "Madao" refers to a sore/ulcer, long in shape like a horse knife clam. However, in the classic text, Madao is juxtaposed with Xiaying. Xiaying is named by location, while Madao is named by morphological similarity; such antithetical phrasing is inconsistent. Madao should also be a name for a body part, similar to Xiaying. It is likely referring to the muscles on the side of the neck, located below the ear and slightly towards the back, directly above the Jianjing acupoint (GB21). Palpating it feels very much like a horse knife. Naming the muscles on the side of the neck "Madao" is analogous to naming the white flesh on the palm "Yuji" (Fish Border)! Using object names for metaphor is also an example of ancient naming conventions. What arises at the location of Xiaying is called Xiaying; therefore, what arises at the location of Madao is called Madao. The juxtaposition in the classic text should be understood in this sense. In Chapter 9 of *Qianjin Fang*, the symptoms of Madao and Madao Jianding (Shoulder Swelling) are treated with the same grammatical structure as axillary swelling, lip injury, inability to move limbs, throat obstruction (Houbi), and swelling in the Tianyou region. Since axilla, lips, and limbs are locations, Madao can be inferred similarly. Most notably, the four characters "Madao Jianding" mean that both the Madao area and the shoulder are swollen. Verifying *Jinkui Yaolue* with *Qianjin Fang*, this is conclusive. If it referred to a long-shaped sore, how would it differ from a round one, warranting specific mention? Furthermore, sores at the Xiaying location are not necessarily long, and sores in the neck-axilla region are not entirely long; how then to distinguish them? Examining the intent of the classic text closely, regardless of length, if it occurs between the muscles on the side of the neck, it is collectively called Madao.
This chapter specifically elucidates "Madao" in *Jinkui Yaolue*. If one rigidly applies this definition to summarize modern medical formularies, it would be incorrect. Those who wish to use modern books should not cite *Jinkui Yaolue*. Self-recorded.