一介之士,苟存心济物,于物必有所济。虽蓬累而行,与得其时则驾者,不可同年而语,而其
志则足尚矣。幕宾袁子体庵,顾影无俦,居珠湖之 。喜读书,达通塞。其才如五石之瓠,不适
于用,然济人利物之心,未尝去怀。早年侍亲疾,博究方书,深得异人授,遂以天下之疲癃生理残障为
己任,视人之呻吟痛苦,不啻若涉者之溺于渊,呼号拯救,而思欲手援之。运筹韬略之暇,医门着
述满簏盈 ,医津一筏,第其中一则耳。每憾今之医籍,大半摭拾前人牙慧,割裂补窜,攘为己有
以博名,高究之中无所得。苟逞其臆见,率意妄行,惟其载肯及溺而已。袁子之《心传》,则折衷
诸家,参以临证经验,有疑似难明者,发挥奥蕴,随笔记录,以待质正。予嘉其阐古今所必由之
理,实天下所未见之书,俾后进者引而伸之,平时得之于心,临症应之于手,裨益苍生,非浅鲜
也。于戎马倥偬之际,抽间阅勘,俟锋焰稍息,亟付手民,以饷世之习医者。苟研求而有得焉,将
免杀人之恶名,而为生人之仁术,岂不懿欤。
时在崇祯岁次癸未仲秋月兵部使者溧阳史可法识
吾尝叹今医诊病,鲜不以捷为工,即延医者,亦以捷为能,何古今之不相若也。夫医之
诊病,必以审慎为本。若捷于按脉,乃市医苟且之为,班断不如是。每治病证,莫不以望、
闻、问、切,细加讨论,然后辨标本,别表里、虚实之异,参四时寒暑之候,随症定方。虽不能
尽合古圣之心传,而可免私心自用之咎也。
况近世之医书,每多以补虚立论。至大实有羸状故,因秽浊、实邪盘踞在内,既不得见
而知之,又为宜补之说横于心中,往往惑于假虚之病象,而人多以下为畏途矣,更有世之不
明虚实之宜,乃不善用者之误。恒见得时之医,自保声名,不肯轻用下法,及至病久正虚,
方投轻下之剂,自无效应;至不得时之医,遇有病症,急于求效,遂妄用下法以决裂。人见
时医用下而无效,庸医用下而致祸,遂使假虚之证误于温补,而戕生多矣。殊不思《内经》有
有故无损之训,仲景有急下存津之法。如《伤寒论》之承气、陷胸等汤,用之得当,立能转危
为安。况邪入于里、如贼踞畿辅内地,非边远之寇可比,急宜荡除,然于腹里地方,而行此
兵凶战危之事,务当操必胜之权而后可。今特将历验心得之法,和盘托出,以济世人之危
殆,而挽夭扎之惨也。
盖诊脉不足凭,以脉有皮;惟看舌苔为准,则以苔无皮,显而易见。大抵有浊垢黄腻
无津之苔,凡见此苔,即用下法,一剂得手,继之以轻重进退,以视浊苔之减否或退尽,而可
以知邪之清净,一目了然。又有一种或隐或现、或黄或灰之苔,当细看其苔,必浮不实,而
必现浊垢之形,是为虚苔,慎勿误用下法,以误人者。近见读书不达变通之医,拘执《伤寒
论》,泥于一日太阳,执定先表后里,概以日数传经立言,昧于郁伏内起之因,而不明常变之
理;往往拘执脾胃宜于芳香温燥、务戒苦寒攻削,乃未究立法之旨耳。即如东垣之补中升阳
等方,是助其本也;仲景之承气、陷胸等法,是祛其邪也。然脏腑因邪气而暂变者,尚在常理
之中,更有变出非常,如老弱、幼稚之质,每有大实之证,竟须竣下,多剂而愈者;又有年当
盛旺,而忽患虚寒;及向非强质,忽患大实者,往往有之。或谓病患由于化气而成,其化实、
化虚、化寒、化热,皆未可常理测焉,临症不可拘守恒情,尤不可固执成见,要在辨证的而用
药当,方克有济。
惟病之已成,虽有良工,终不能保其十全,欲求最上之道,莫妙于治其未病。大凡疾
病,虽发于一朝,已实酿于多日。若于未发之先,必呈于形色,遇明眼人预为治疗,可期消
患于未萌也。至于病势已减,末后调摄尤宜加慎,既勿留邪遗患,更忌过剂损正,均关至要。
惟膏丸本为缓调善后之用,然亦当知缓急,细察精详。若正气已复,即宜停止,防久而增气,
反生他患,切勿以补益之剂,可以久服。总之,无病不宜以药饵为调养,非徒无益,而反有
损,以其药性各有偏执故也。仍须研究经文,握阴阳之纲领,最为简捷。譬如伤于食者,若
无阴阳偏盛之变,不过临时闷胀,捐谷一日即消;倘阴寒郁抑,则所停之食,为水中之冰矣;
若温热郁伏,则所伤之食,为炉中之炭矣。无形附着有质,有质助其无形,病患成矣。至于
血之瘀,有寒凝、热结之因;蛔之动,有大寒、大热之分。
一切疾病,或由天时感化,或因情志感伤,或本质偏虚,其成者皆归二气为本,明乎
《内经》云∶“水火者,阴阳之征兆也;寒热者,阴阳之性气也”,乃得由博反约之道焉。若欲
明医理之渊微,必先考审《素问》、《灵枢》之秘,熟读仲景《伤寒》之旨,自有左右逢源之
妙,非徒恃于阴阳五行,创滋阴、温补之法,以八味、六味汤丸加减变化,误人非浅。余所论
方法,皆为挽回温补之弊而设,亦不得已也,非欲与时医争名,亦不欲妄议着书者之过,而
实欲明虚实,别标本,以为寿世济人之殷鉴也可。
澜按∶先生着书时,当崇祯甲申以前,正四方扰乱之日。其所谓温补为害,乃隐斥薛立
斋之误。其时士大夫惑于温补,致误者多,先生所不明言者,恐伤时而招尤,借以避世俗之
忌,而以明虚实、别标本,为寿世济人之术、不啻大声疾呼,其心可谓仁焉。
一位普通的读书人,如果心存救济万物之心,对万物必定有所补益。即使生活困顿、四处奔波,与那些得遇时机便出仕为官的人相比,不可相提并论,但其志向足以令人推崇。幕僚袁体庵先生,形单影只,居住在珠湖之滨。他喜爱读书,通达世事顺逆的道理。他的才华如同五石容量的大葫芦,虽不适宜世俗之用,但救济世人、利益万物的初心,从未离开过胸怀。早年侍奉双亲治疗疾病时,广泛探究医书,深得异人传授,于是将天下那些疲惫羸弱、肢体残障之人的生计视为自己的责任,看待他人的呻吟痛苦,就像看到有人溺水深渊一样,呼号拯救,想要亲手援助他们。在运筹帷幄之余,他在医学门类的著述装满箱笼,医海中的一叶筏子,这只是其中一篇罢了。常常遗憾当今的医籍,大半是拾取前人的陈词滥调,割裂拼凑窜改,窃为己有以博取名声,在深究义理中一无所获。如果放纵个人的主观见解,随意妄行,只会导致患者死亡或陷入绝境而已。袁先生的《证治心传》,则折衷各家学说,参合临床实践经验,对于疑似难明的地方,发挥其深奥蕴意,随笔记录,以待后人指正。我赞赏他阐发古今必然遵循的道理,这确实是天下未曾见过的书籍,使后学者能够引伸扩展,平时在心中领悟,临症时在手头应用,裨益百姓,功德非浅薄啊。在战事繁忙之际,抽空阅读校勘,等待战火稍息,急忙交付刻印,以馈赠世间学习医学的人。如果能钻研探求而有所心得,将能免除杀人的恶名,而成为救人的仁术,难道不是美好吗?
时在崇祯年间癸未年仲秋八月,兵部使者溧阳人史可法识记
我曾感叹当今医生诊病,很少不以快速为擅长;即使用药者延请医生,也以快速为能干,为何古今相差如此之大呢?医生的诊病,必须以审慎为根本。如果按脉迅速,那是市井庸医苟且敷衍的行为,高明的大夫绝不会如此。每次诊治病症,没有不通过望、闻、问、切四诊,仔细讨论,然后辨别标本,区分表里、虚实的差异,参合四季寒暑的气候特点,随症状确定方剂。虽然不能完全符合古代圣人的心传,但可以免除凭私心自用的过错。
况且近世的医书,大多以补虚立论。到了“大实有羸状”(真实邪气盛极却表现出虚弱假象)的情况,因为秽浊、实邪盘踞在体内,既不能直观得知,又被宜补的说法横亘在心中,往往被虚假的虚弱病象迷惑,而很多人因此将攻下法视为畏途。更有世人不明白虚实适用的道理,这是不善用医者造成的错误。常常见到当时的医生,为了保全名声,不肯轻易使用攻下法,等到病情日久正气虚弱,才投用轻度的攻下药剂,自然没有疗效;至于不得时的医生,遇到病症,急于求效,于是妄用攻下法导致病情恶化。人们看到时医用攻下无效,庸医用攻下致祸,于是使得假虚的证候误用温补,而伤害生命的情况很多了。殊不知《内经》有“有故无损”(有病则病受之,不伤正气)的训诫,张仲景有急下存津液的方法。如《伤寒论》中的承气汤、陷胸汤等,使用得当,立刻能转危为安。何况邪气入里,如同盗贼占据京城内地,不是边远寇贼可比,急需荡除,然而在腹里脏腑这样重要的地方,施行这种兵凶战危的治疗手段,务必掌握必胜的把握才可以。现在特别将历验有效的心得之法,全盘托出,以救济世人的危急,挽回夭折的惨状。
大概诊脉不足以完全凭借,因为脉象有浮皮之伪;只有看舌苔为准绳,因为舌苔没有伪装,显而易见。大致如果有浊垢黄腻无津液的舌苔,凡是见到这种舌苔,就立即使用攻下法,一剂见效,随后根据轻重进退,观察浊苔是否减少或退尽,从而知道邪气是否清除,一目了然。又有一种或隐或现、或黄或灰的舌苔,应当仔细看其舌苔,一定浮而不实,并且必然呈现浊垢的形状,这是虚苔,千万不要误用攻下法,以免害人。近来见到读书不能变通的医生,拘泥于《伤寒论》,固执于“一日太阳”的理论,坚持先解表后攻里的原则,一概以日数传经来立论,不明白郁伏内起的病因,而不明常规与变化的道理;往往拘泥于脾胃宜用芳香温燥、务必戒除苦寒攻削的观点,这是没有探究立法宗旨的缘故。就像李东垣的补中益气升阳等方,是扶助正气;张仲景的承气、陷胸等法,是祛除邪气。然而脏腑因邪气暂时发生变化的,还在常理之中,更有变化出乎寻常的,如老弱、年幼体质的人,常有表现为大实证,必须峻猛攻下,多剂才能痊愈的情况;又有正值壮年,却忽然患虚寒病;以及向来并非强壮体质,却忽然患大实证的,往往都有这种情况。有人说病患由于气化而成,其化实、化虚、化寒、化热,都不能用常理推测,临症不可拘守常规情理,尤其不可固执成见,关键在于辨证准确而用药恰当,才能有所济助。
只是疾病既然已经形成,虽然有高明的医生,终究不能保证十全十美,想要追求最高明的道,不如在治疗未病之前。大凡疾病,虽然发作于一朝一夕,其实已经在多日酝酿。如果在未发作之前,必定在形色上有所表现,遇到明眼人预先治疗,可以期望在祸患未萌生时就消除它。至于病势已经减退,最后的调养摄生尤其应该谨慎,既要不留邪气遗患,更要忌过度用药损伤正气,这都是至关重要的。膏剂和丸药本来是为缓慢调理善后之用,但也应当知道缓急,细致考察精详。如果正气已经恢复,就应当停止,防止久服增加气机偏盛,反而产生其他病患,千万不要认为补益药剂可以久服。总之,无病之人不宜以药物作为调养,不仅无益,反而有害,因为药性各有偏执的缘故。仍然需要研究经文,把握阴阳的纲领,最为简捷。比如伤于饮食,如果没有阴阳偏盛的变异,不过是临时闷胀,停食一天即可消除;倘若阴寒郁抑,那么停滞的食物就像水中的冰了;若温热郁伏,那么受伤的食物就像炉中的炭了。无形之气附着于有形之质,有形之质助长无形之气,病患就形成了。至于血的瘀滞,有寒凝、热结的原因;蛔虫的扰动,有大寒、大热的区别。
一切疾病,有的由天时感化引起,有的因情志感伤引起,有的本质偏虚,其形成的原因都归结于二气为本,明白了《内经》所说的:“水火者,阴阳之征兆也;寒热者,阴阳之性气也”,就能得到由博返约的道理了。如果想要明了医理的深微,必须先考审《素问》、《灵枢》的秘密,熟读张仲景《伤寒论》的宗旨,自然会有左右逢源的妙处,不仅仅依靠阴阳五行,创制滋阴、温补的方法,以八味丸、六味丸加减变化,误人非浅。我所论述的方法,都是为了挽回温补流弊而设立的,也是不得已而为之,并不是想与时医争名,也不想妄议著书者的过错,而是确实想要明辨虚实,区分标本,作为长寿于世、救济他人的深刻借鉴。
澜按:先生著书之时,是在崇祯甲申年以前,正是四方动乱之日。他所指出的温补为害,乃是隐含地斥责薛立斋的错误。当时士大夫迷惑于温补,导致误治的人很多,先生不明言这一点,恐怕触犯时忌招致怨恨,借此避开世俗的忌讳,而以明辨虚实、区分标本,作为长寿于世、救济他人的技术,无异于大声疾呼,其心可谓仁爱啊。
A common scholar, if harboring a mind to benefit all things, will surely contribute to the welfare of all. Although he may live in poverty and wander about, compared with those who take office when the time is right, they are not comparable; yet his aspiration is worthy of admiration. Mr. Yuan Ti'an, a staff officer, stood alone without companions, residing by the shores of Zhu Lake. He loved reading and understood both prosperity and adversity. His talent was like a five-shi gourd, unsuitable for worldly use, yet his heart to save people and benefit creatures never left him. In his early years, while attending to his parents' illnesses, he extensively studied medical texts and received secret teachings from unusual masters. Thus, he took it as his responsibility to care for the livelihoods of the weary, frail, crippled, and disabled throughout the world. Viewing others' groans and pain was like seeing someone drowning in an abyss; he would cry out for rescue and strive to help them personally. Amidst his duties of strategizing, his writings on medicine filled his chests; "Yi Jin Yi Fa" (A Raft in the Sea of Medicine) is merely one such work. He often lamented that most contemporary medical books were little more than picking up the dregs of predecessors, cutting, pasting, and plagiarizing to gain fame, yielding nothing upon deep inquiry. If one indulges subjective views and acts arbitrarily, it leads only to death or despair for patients. Mr. Yuan's "Zhengzhi Xin Chuan" (Heart Transmission of Diagnosis and Treatment), however, synthesizes various schools, incorporates clinical experience, elucidates profound mysteries where doubts arise, and records them casually for future correction. I appreciate his explication of principles essential through ancient and modern times; this is indeed a book unseen in the world, allowing later learners to extend its knowledge, internalize it in daily life, and apply it at the bedside, benefiting the populace significantly. Amidst military turmoil, I took time to read and verify it, waiting for the flames of war to subside before hastily having it printed to offer to those studying medicine. If they study it and gain insights, they will avoid the evil reputation of killing and practice the benevolent art of saving lives, which is truly admirable.
Recorded in the mid-autumn month of the Guiwei year of the Chongzhen era by Shi Kefa, Envoy of the Ministry of War, from Liyang.
I often sigh that contemporary physicians rarely excel in speed when diagnosing diseases; even those seeking doctors consider speed a virtue. Why is there such a disparity between ancient and modern times? The diagnosis of disease must be based on prudence. Rapid pulse-taking is the perfunctory act of market quacks; great physicians do not act thus. In every case, one must employ observation, auscultation/olfaction, inquiry, and palpation (Wang, Wen, Wen, Qie), discuss meticulously, then differentiate root and branch, exterior and interior, deficiency and excess, considering the seasonal climate changes, and prescribe formulas accordingly. Although this may not fully align with the transmission of ancient sages, it avoids the fault of self-will and private bias.
Moreover, recent medical books often argue primarily for tonifying deficiency. In cases of "true excess presenting as false deficiency" (Da Shi You Lei Zhuang), where turbid pathogens and excess evils stagnate internally, since this cannot be seen directly, and the notion of "suitability for tonification" dominates the mind, one is often confused by false deficiency signs, leading many to view purgative methods as a path of dread. Furthermore, some fail to understand the appropriateness of deficiency and excess, resulting in misuse by practitioners. It is common to see contemporary physicians, wishing to preserve their reputation, unwilling to lightly use purgatives; by the time the illness lingers and righteous qi becomes deficient, they administer mild purgatives, which naturally yield no effect. Conversely, incompetent physicians, eager for quick results, recklessly use purgatives, causing devastation. Seeing that contemporary physicians' purgatives fail and quacks' purgatives cause disaster, people mistakenly treat false deficiency with warming tonics, resulting in many deaths. They fail to recall the teaching in *Neijing*: "Where there is pathology, there is no damage [to the righteous qi]" (You Gu Wu Sun), and Zhang Zhongjing's method of urgent purgation to preserve fluids. For instance, Chengqi Tang and Xianxiong Tang in *Shanghan Lun*, when used appropriately, can immediately turn danger into safety. When pathogens enter the interior, it is like bandits occupying the capital region, not comparable to border raiders; urgent clearance is needed. However, performing such dangerous military-like treatments within the abdominal organs requires absolute certainty of success. Here, I present my verified experiences entirely to save people from crisis and prevent premature death.
Generally, pulse diagnosis alone is unreliable because pulses can have superficial deceptions; observing the tongue coating is the standard because coatings lack disguise and are obvious. Generally, if a thick, greasy, yellow, dry coating is present, one should immediately use purgatives. One dose brings relief; subsequently, adjust dosage up or down until the coating clears, indicating the elimination of pathogens, clear at a glance. Another type of coating, appearing intermittently, yellow or gray, must be examined carefully: if it floats and feels empty but shows turbid characteristics, it is a deficiency coating; do not mistake it for excess and use purgatives, lest you harm the patient. Recently, I have seen doctors who read but lack flexibility, rigidly adhering to *Shanghan Lun*, insisting on "Day 1 Taiyang," holding firmly to "treat exterior first, interior later," and arguing solely based on days of transmission, ignorant of internal stagnation causes and the principles of constancy and change. They often insist that the spleen and stomach prefer aromatic, warm, and dry herbs, strictly avoiding bitter-cold purgatives, failing to grasp the intent of prescription formulation. For example, Li Dongyuan's Buzhong Yiqi Decoction aids the root (righteous qi); Zhang Zhongjing's Chengqi and Xianxiong methods dispel pathogens. While temporary organ changes due to pathogens follow normal logic, extraordinary variations exist. Frail elderly or young children may present with severe excess syndromes requiring strong purgatives over multiple doses to heal. Conversely, robust adults may suddenly suffer from deficiency-cold, or previously weak individuals may suddenly suffer from severe excess. Some argue that diseases arise from Qi transformation; transformations into excess, deficiency, cold, or heat cannot always be predicted by routine logic. Clinical practice must not stick to conventions or fixed views; the key lies in accurate syndrome differentiation and appropriate medication to achieve efficacy.
Once a disease has formed, even skilled physicians cannot guarantee perfection. The highest way is to treat disease before it arises. Diseases, though manifesting suddenly, have brewed over many days. Before onset, signs appear in complexion and form; if a wise practitioner treats them preemptively, disasters can be eliminated before they sprout. When the disease trend subsides, final recuperation requires extra caution: do not leave pathogens to cause lingering issues, nor overdose to damage righteous qi; both are crucial. Pastes and pills are for slow conditioning and aftercare, but one must know urgency and examine details carefully. If righteous qi recovers, stop administration to prevent long-term use from increasing Qi imbalance and causing other ailments; do not assume tonics can be taken indefinitely. In short, healthy people should not use drugs for maintenance; it is not only useless but harmful due to the biased nature of medicinal properties. One must still study classics, grasp the guideline of Yin and Yang, which is the simplest approach. For example, food injury without Yin-Yang imbalance causes only temporary bloating, resolved by fasting for a day; if inhibited by yin-cold, the stagnant food becomes like ice in water; if suppressed by warmth-heat, it becomes like charcoal in a furnace. Formless Qi attaches to material substance, and material substance supports formless Qi, creating disease. Blood stasis has causes of cold coagulation or heat binding; roundworm movement differs by extreme cold or heat.
All diseases, whether caused by climatic influences, emotional injuries, or inherent deficiency, ultimately stem from the two Qi (Yin and Yang). Understanding *Neijing*: "Water and Fire are the manifestations of Yin and Yang; Cold and Heat are the natures of Yin and Yang," allows one to return from complexity to simplicity. To understand the profundity of medical theory, one must study the secrets of *Suwen* and *Lingshu*, and familiarize oneself with Zhang Zhongjing's *Shanghan Lun*, achieving mastery effortlessly, rather than relying merely on Yin-Yang and Five Elements to create methods of nourishing Yin or warming tonification, modifying Bawei Wan and Liuwei Wan, which mislead people significantly. My discussed methods aim to correct the abuses of warming tonification, out of necessity, not to compete for fame with contemporary physicians, nor to criticize authors blindly, but truly to clarify deficiency and excess, distinguish root and branch, serving as a profound lesson for longevity and humanitarian aid.
Note by Lan: When the Master wrote this book, prior to the Jiashen year of Chongzhen, the realm was in chaos. His criticism of the harm of warming tonification implicitly rebuked the errors of Xue Lizhai. At that time, scholars were misled by warming tonification, causing many mistakes. The Master did not state this explicitly, fearing to offend the times and attract blame, avoiding secular taboos. Instead, by emphasizing clarifying deficiency/excess and distinguishing root/branch as techniques for longevity and aid, he cried out loudly; his heart was truly benevolent.