岁乙亥春三月余掩关养 邓尉山人李君三源过访出其所篡针灸逢源一书相质正余曰聋者
与别宫征瞽者不可与辨黑白余虽尝涉猎岐黄书于方剂略识一二而于针灸则懵然无所知安敢强
作解人哉李君曰不然夫道一而已自周礼有疾医疡医之分而医之内外始判然吾观古者以汤液治
内以针灸治外理本同条而共贯事实相济以有成灵素详针灸而略汤液非毗外也长沙以后详汤液
而略针灸非毗内也时世之淳浇民生之强弱使然也人身内而脏腑外而经络毛腠不过一气一血相
为流贯故病有内有外有由外及内有由内达外循环无端息息相通知汤液而不知针灸是知人有脏
腑而不知有经络毛腠也知针灸而不知汤液是知人有经络毛腠而不知有脏腑也病虽万变人只一
身医者必离而二之可乎哉且医而不知针灸将不知脏腑经络之相为表里乎不知脏腑经络之相为
表里则脉络之交会起止气血之生死出入又乌从而测之冒昧以施其技不几如思明者之掩其目思
聪者之填其耳乎余之为此书非欲于前贤著作外拔赵帜而立赤帜也意在通内外两家之筏而使之
左右逢源会归一致不至如断港绝潢者之适乎此而不适乎彼也子其为我校仇而存之余深韪其言
晨窗展卷反复商榷条分缕析发凡起例始则探源灵素继则荟萃群言正经穴之谬讹补注疏之阙略
本铜人聚英资生神应针灸之法而广其义于长沙河间东垣景岳审证之书因端竟委纲举目张不特
习针科者可因证以考穴按穴以施治先洞悉乎致病之由而后巧施其针灸之术即习方书者亦可藉
是以佐汤液之所不逮而上合乎灵素以暨长沙东垣内外相资针药并用之旨其有裨于医术者岂浅
鲜哉余故乐得而序之时。
嘉庆丁丑岁春二月虞阳同学弟席亮丽农氏拜撰
嘉庆乙亥年(1815年)春季三月,我闭门修养时,邓尉山中的李三源先生前来拜访,拿出他所编纂的《针灸逢源》一书向我请教指正。我说:“聋人无法辨别宫商角徵羽五音,盲人无法分辨黑白颜色。我虽然曾经粗略地涉猎过岐黄医学书籍,对方剂略知一二,但对于针灸却茫然无知,哪里敢强行充当懂行的人呢?”李先生说:“不是这样的。道是统一的。自从《周礼》将医生分为疾医和疡医,医学的内外科才截然分开。我看古人用汤液治疗内病,用针灸治疗外病,道理本是同出一源且相互贯通的,事实也是相辅相成而取得成效的。《黄帝内经·灵枢》详细记载针灸而简略记载汤液,并非偏袒外治;张仲景《伤寒杂病论》之后详于汤液而略于针灸,也并非偏袒内治。这是时代风俗的淳朴与浮华、民众体质的强弱所导致的。人体内部有脏腑,外部有经络、皮毛腠理,不过是一气一血相互流贯。所以疾病有内有外,有由外传入内的,也有由内达于外的,循环无端,息息相通。如果只知道汤液而不知道针灸,就是只知道人有脏腑而不知道人有经络毛腠;如果只知道针灸而不知道汤液,就是只知道人有经络毛腠而不知道人有脏腑。病情虽然千变万化,但人只有一身,医者怎能将其割裂为二呢?况且,如果医生不懂针灸,怎么能知道脏腑与经络互为表里的关系呢?如果不了解脏腑经络互为表里,那么脉络的交会起止、气血的生死出入又从哪里去推测呢?这样冒昧地施展医术,不就像想看清东西却捂住眼睛、想听清声音却堵住耳朵的人一样吗?我编写这本书,并不是想在先贤著作之外另立门户、独树一帜,而是意在作为沟通内外两家的桥梁,使它们左右逢源,汇归一致,不至于像断绝的水沟那样顾此失彼。希望您能为我校对文字并保存下来。”我非常赞同他的话。在清晨的窗前展开书卷,反复商讨推敲,条理分明地分析,确立凡例。起初探求《灵枢》、《素问》之源,接着荟萃各家言论,纠正经穴的谬误讹传,补充注释疏漏缺略之处。以《铜人腧穴针灸图经》、《针灸聚英》、《针灸资生经》、《神应经》等针灸著作为基础,广其义理;参考张仲景、刘河间、李东垣、张景岳等人审证辨病的书籍,探究事物的始末,纲举目张。这不仅让学习针灸科的人可以依据病症来考证穴位,按穴位施行治疗,事先洞悉致病的原因,然后巧妙地施用针灸技术;即使学习方书的人也可以借此弥补汤液的不足,从而上合《灵枢》、《素问》以及张仲景、李东垣内外相资、针药并用的宗旨。这对医术的帮助难道不大吗?所以我乐意为此书写序。
嘉庆丁丑年(1817年)春季二月,虞阳同学弟席亮丽农氏恭敬撰写。
In the third month of spring in the Yihai year (1815) of the Jiaqing reign, while I was secluding myself for recuperation, Mr. Li Sanyuan from Mount Dengwei visited me and presented his compiled work, *Zhenjiu Fengyuan* (Accumulated Sources of Acupuncture and Moxibustion), for my review and correction. I said, "A deaf person cannot distinguish between the five musical tones (Gong, Shang, Jue, Zhi, Yu), and a blind person cannot differentiate black from white. Although I have casually perused medical texts attributed to Qibo and Huangdi (Qihuang), knowing a little about herbal decoctions (Tangye), I am completely ignorant of acupuncture and moxibustion. How dare I pretend to be an expert?" Mr. Li replied, "Not so. The Dao is one. Since the *Rites of Zhou* (*Zhouli*) divided physicians into those treating internal diseases (Jiyi) and those treating surgical/external lesions (Yangyi), the distinction between internal and external medicine began. Observing the ancients, they used herbal decoctions to treat internal conditions and acupuncture/moxibustion to treat external conditions; the principle was identical and interconnected, and the practices complemented each other to achieve success. The *Lingshu* (Spiritual Pivot) detailed acupuncture but briefly mentioned decoctions, not because it favored external treatments; after Zhang Zhongjing, decoctions were detailed while acupuncture was brief, not because it favored internal treatments. This was due to the simplicity or decadence of the times and the strength or weakness of the people's constitutions. Internally, humans have Zang-Fu organs (Viscera); externally, they have meridians (Jingluo), skin, hair, and pores (Maocou). These are merely Qi and Blood flowing through each other. Thus, diseases can be internal or external, entering from outside to inside, or emerging from inside to outside, cycling endlessly and connecting intimately. To know only decoctions but not acupuncture is to know that humans have Zang-Fu but not meridians and skin; to know only acupuncture but not decoctions is to know that humans have meridians and skin but not Zang-Fu. Although diseases vary infinitely, the human body is singular. Can a physician separate them into two? Moreover, if a physician does not understand acupuncture, how can they comprehend the exterior-interior relationship between Zang-Fu and meridians? Without understanding this relationship, how could one deduce the intersections, origins, and terminations of collaterals, or the life-and-death entry and exit of Qi and Blood? Practicing medicine rashly in such ignorance would be akin to trying to see by covering one's eyes or trying to hear by plugging one's ears. My purpose in writing this book is not to raise a new banner distinct from the works of former sages, but to serve as a raft connecting internal and external schools, allowing them to meet harmoniously and converge into unity, rather than being like a dry canal that serves one side but fails the other. Please proofread and preserve it for me." I deeply agreed with his words. Unrolling the scroll at the morning window, we discussed and deliberated repeatedly, analyzing points systematically and establishing principles. Initially, we explored the sources in the *Lingshu* and *Suwen*; subsequently, we gathered diverse opinions, corrected errors in meridian points, and supplemented omissions in annotations. Relying on texts such as the *Tongren Shuxue Zhenjiu Tujing* (Illustrated Manual of Acupuncture Points on Bronze Figures), *Zhenjiu Juying* (Acupuncture and Moxibustion Gathered Brilliance), *Zhenjiu Zisheng Jing* (Divine Response Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion), and *Shenying Jing*, we expanded their meanings. Referencing the diagnostic works of Zhang Zhongjing, Liu Wansu, Li Dongyuan, and Zhang Jingyue, we traced causes to effects, making the outline clear and details comprehensive. This allows students of acupuncture to examine points based on symptoms and apply treatment according to points, first thoroughly understanding the etiology before skillfully applying acupuncture techniques. It also allows students of herbal formulas to use this knowledge to supplement the limitations of decoctions, thereby aligning with the teachings of the *Lingshu*, *Suwen*, Zhang Zhongjing, and Li Dongyuan regarding the mutual support of internal and external treatments and the combined use of needles and herbs. The benefit to medical arts is certainly profound. Therefore, I gladly wrote this preface.
Written respectfully by Xi Shan, courtesy name Lianong, fellow student from Yuyang, in the second month of spring in the Dingchou year (1817) of the Jiaqing reign.