王海藏曰天之邪气感则害人五脏以是知内外两感脏腑俱病欲表之则有里欲下之则有表表
里既
不能一治故云两感者不治然所禀有虚实所感有浅深虚而感之深者必死实而感之浅者犹可治治
之而不救者有矣未有不治而获生者矣余尝用大羌活汤间有生者十得二三故立此以待好生君子
用之
按本方治法见后
赵嗣真曰仲景论两感为必死之证而复以治有先后发表攻里之说继之者盖不忍坐视而欲觊
其万
一之可活也活人书云宜救里以四逆汤后救表以桂枝汤殊不知仲景云太阳与少阴俱病则头痛为
太阳邪盛于表口干而渴为少阴邪盛于里也阳明与太阴俱病则身热谵语为阳明邪盛于表不欲食
腹满为太阴邪盛于里也少阳与厥阴俱病则耳聋为少阳邪盛于表囊缩而厥为厥阴邪盛于里也三
阳之头痛身热耳聋救表已自不可三阴之腹满口干渴缩囊而厥不下可乎活人书引下痢身疼痛虚
寒救里之例而欲施于烦渴腹满谵语囊缩热实之证然乎否乎盖仲景所谓发表者葛根麻黄是也所
谓攻里者调胃承气是也活人书所谓救里则是四逆救表则是桂枝今以救为攻岂不相背若用四逆
汤是以火济火而腹满谵语囊缩等证何由而除脏腑何由而通荣卫何由而行而六日死者可立而待
也吁两感虽为不治之证矣然用药之法助正除邪虚实实虚补不足损有余之理学人不可不素有
一定之法于胸中也
王海藏说:天之邪气侵袭人体,会伤害五脏。因此可知,内外两感会导致脏腑同时患病。想要用发汗法解表,则担心伤及里证;想要用泻下法治里,则担心伤及表证。既然表里不能同时治疗,所以说两感病属于不治之症。然而,患者禀赋有虚实之分,感受邪气有深浅之别。禀赋虚弱且感受邪气深重的,必然死亡;禀赋充实且感受邪气浅表的,尚可治疗。虽然也有治疗无效而死亡的案例,但没有不治疗而能存活的。我曾经使用大羌活汤,偶尔有存活者,十人中能救活二三人,所以确立此方,留给爱惜生命的君子使用。按:本方的治法详见后文。
赵嗣真说:张仲景在论述中认为两感是必死的证候,但又接着提出治疗应有先后顺序,先发表后攻里的说法。后继的医家大概是不忍心坐视病人死亡,而希望侥幸有一线生机得以存活。《活人书》说:应当先用四逆汤救里,后用桂枝汤解表。殊不知张仲景说:太阳经与少阴经同时发病,头痛是因为太阳邪气盛于体表,口干口渴是因为少阴邪气盛于体内。阳明经与太阴经同时发病,身热、谵语是因为阳明邪气盛于体表,不想进食、腹部胀满是因太阴邪气盛于体内。少阳经与厥阴经同时发病,耳聋是因为少阳邪气盛于体表,阴囊收缩、四肢厥冷是因为厥阴邪气盛于体内。三阳病的头痛、身热、耳聋,若只解表已属困难;三阴病的腹满、口干渴、阴囊收缩、四肢厥冷,若不攻里,难道可以吗?《活人书》引用下痢、身疼痛等虚寒证需救里的例子,却想将其应用于烦渴、腹满、谵语、阴囊收缩等热实证上,这合理吗?所谓张仲景所说的“发表”,是指葛根、麻黄;所谓的“攻里”,是指调胃承气汤。而《活人书》所说的“救里”是用四逆汤,“救表”是用桂枝汤。现在把“救”当作“攻”,岂不是背道而驰?如果使用四逆汤,那就是以火助火,那么腹满、谵语、阴囊收缩等症状如何消除?脏腑如何通畅?营卫之气如何运行?六日而死的结果将是立竿见影的。唉,两感病虽然被视为不治之症,但用药的原则在于扶助正气、祛除邪气,根据虚实情况,补其不足,损其有余。医者心中不可不预先确立一定的法则。
Wang Haizang stated: Pathogenic factors from Heaven (external pathogens) affect the body and harm the Five Zang organs. From this, it is known that simultaneous internal and external infection leads to disease in both the Fu and Zang organs. If one attempts to release the exterior via sweating, the interior may be compromised; if one attempts to purge the interior, the exterior may be damaged. Since the exterior and interior cannot be treated simultaneously, it is said that "Lianggan" (simultaneous transmission of two meridians) is incurable. However, individuals vary in their constitutional strength (deficiency or excess), and pathogenic invasion varies in depth. Those with deficiency constitution and deep invasion will inevitably die; those with robust constitution and shallow invasion may still be treatable. Although there are cases where treatment fails and death occurs, there are none who survive without treatment. I have occasionally used Da Qianghuo Tang (Great Notopterygia Decoction), saving two or three out of ten patients. Therefore, I established this formula for benevolent physicians to use. Note: The treatment method for this formula is detailed later.
Zhao Sizhen stated: Zhang Zhongjing regarded Lianggan as a fatal syndrome but subsequently discussed treatment priorities, advocating releasing the exterior first and purging the interior second. Successive practitioners likely did this because they could not bear to watch patients die and hoped for a slight chance of survival. *Huangdi Yishu* (The Book of Life) states: One should first rescue the interior with Sini Tang (Frigid Extremities Decoction) and then release the exterior with Guizhi Tang (Cinnamon Twig Decoction). This ignores what Zhang Zhongjing said: When Taiyang and Shaoyin are diseased simultaneously, headache indicates Taiyang pathogenic excess at the exterior, while dry mouth and thirst indicate Shaoyin pathogenic excess at the interior. When Yangming and Taiyin are diseased simultaneously, fever and delirium indicate Yangming pathogenic excess at the exterior, while anorexia and abdominal fullness indicate Taiyin pathogenic excess at the interior. When Shaoyang and Jueyin are diseased simultaneously, deafness indicates Shaoyang pathogenic excess at the exterior, while retraction of the genitals and cold extremities indicate Jueyin pathogenic excess at the interior. For the Three Yang diseases (headache, fever, deafness), releasing the exterior alone is already difficult; for the Three Yin diseases (abdominal fullness, dry mouth/thirst, genital retraction, cold extremities), is it acceptable not to purge the interior? *Huangdi Yishu* cites the example of diarrhea and body pain requiring interior rescue due to deficiency-cold, yet applies this to heat-excess syndromes characterized by irritability, thirst, abdominal fullness, delirium, and genital retraction. Is this reasonable? What Zhang Zhongjing referred to as "releasing the exterior" involves Gegen (Kudzu Root) and Mahuang (Ephedra); what he referred to as "purging the interior" involves Tiaowei Chengqi Tang (Harmonizing the Stomach and Regulating the Qi Decoction). In contrast, *Huangdi Yishu* defines "rescuing the interior" as using Sini Tang and "rescuing the exterior" as using Guizhi Tang. To equate "rescue" with "purge" is contradictory. Using Sini Tang in such cases would be adding fire to fire; how would symptoms like abdominal fullness, delirium, and genital retraction be resolved? How would the Zang-Fu organs become unblocked? How would Ying and Wei Qi circulate? Death within six days would follow immediately. Alas, although Lianggan is considered incurable, the principle of medication lies in supporting healthy Qi and eliminating pathogenic factors, tonifying deficiency, and reducing excess. Physicians must have a consistent methodology in mind.