黄 三阴有传经之邪有内感之邪传经者自太阳传入者是也内感者直中三阴非自阳经次第流传而来由形寒饮冷而
得
损动胃气之所致也其脉证略与伤寒外感之证相似细辨之特异耳然止系杂病非伤寒热病受寒之证也夫邪之生也或生于阴
或生于阳其生于阳者得之风雨寒暑其生于阴者得之饮食居处阴阳喜怒仲景云发热而恶寒者发于阳也无热而恶寒者发于
阴也此三阴内感之证首尾无热纵有热者亦仲景所谓反发热也反当考始得之三字则见矣内感之证始终只在一经不复传变
不传者何阳动而阴静故阳传而阴不传也若以伤寒之三阴三阳言之则所传者表里经络而已况风寒六气之邪中人或中于阳
经或入于阴络孰为之先孰为之后乌可专以太阳为受邪之始故各经皆能受邪然邪自太阳始者比各经居多盖始虽自三阴中
热者亦传归阳明而后已也三阴经自中寒决无复传变三阴无合并病者以此
王 尝读张仲景伤寒论于太阴有曰自利不渴者属太阴以其藏有寒故也当温之宜服四逆辈于少阴有曰少阴病得之
一
二日口中和其背恶寒者当灸之附子汤主之少阴病身体痛手足寒骨节痛脉沉者附子汤主之少阴病下利白通汤主之少阴病
下利脉微者与白通汤利不止厥逆无脉干呕烦者白通加猪胆汁汤主之少阴下利清谷里寒外热手足厥逆脉微欲绝身反不恶
寒其人面赤色或腹痛或干呕或咽痛或利止脉不出者通脉四逆汤主之少阴病脉沉者急温之宜四逆汤于厥阴有曰手足厥寒
脉细欲绝者当归四逆汤主之大汗若大下利而厥冷者四逆汤主之观仲景此论则伤寒三阴必有寒证而宜用温热之剂也及读
刘守真之书有曰伤寒邪热在表腑病为阳邪热在里脏病为阴俗妄谓有寒热阴阳异证误人久矣寒病有之非汗病之谓也寒病
止为杂病终莫能为汗病且造化汁液之气者乃阳热之气非阴寒之所能也虽仲景有四逆汤证是治表热里和误以寒药下之太
早表热入里下利不止及或表热里寒自利急以四逆温里利止里和急解其表也故仲景四逆汤证复有承气汤下之者由是伤寒
汗病经直言热病而不言寒也经言三阴证者邪热在脏在里以脏与里为阴当下热者也素问论伤寒热病有二篇名曰热竟无寒
理兼素问并灵枢诸篇运气造化之理推之则为热病诚非寒也观守真此论则伤寒无问在表在里与夫三阳三阴皆一于为热而
决无或寒者矣两说不同其是非之判必有一居此者由是彼此反复究诘其义而久不能得虽至神疲气耗不舍置者自谓此是伤
寒大纲领此义不明则千言万语皆未足以为后学式况戕贼民生何有穷极也哉意谓成无己之注必有所发明者遂因而求之然
亦止是随文而略释之竟不明言何由为热何由为寒之故此非其不欲言也盖止知伤寒皆是传经故疑于六经所传俱为热证而
热无变寒之理遂不敢别白耳以寒为本脏之寒欤安得当热邪传里入深之时反独见寒而不见热者且所用温热药能不助传经
之热邪乎以寒为外邪之寒欤则在三阳已成热矣岂有传至三阴而反为寒哉成氏能潜心乎此则必悟其所以然矣自仲景作伤
寒论以来靡或遗之而弗宗至于异同之论兴而渔者走渊木者走山矣宜乎后人不能决于似是而非之际故或谓今世并无真伤
寒病又或以为今人所得之病俱是内伤又昧者至谓伤寒论中诸温药悉为传经热邪而用者以三阴经属阴故也又其大谬者则
曰凡论中有寒字皆当作热字看呜呼末流之弊一至此乎于是澄心静虑以涵泳之一旦划然若有所悟者然亦未敢必其当否也
姑陈之以从有道之正夫三阳之病其寒邪之在太阳也寒郁其阳阳不畅而成热阳虽人身之正气既郁则为邪矣用麻黄发表以
逐其寒则腠理通而郁热泄故汗而愈苟或不汗不解其热不得外泄则必里入故传阳明传少阳而或入腑也若夫三阴之病则或
寒或热者何哉盖寒邪之伤人也或有在太阳经郁热然后以次而传至阴经者或有太阳不传阳明少阳而便传三阴经者或有寒
邪不从阳经而始直伤阴经者或有虽从太阳而始不及郁热即入少阴而独见少阴证者或有始自太阳即入少阴而太阳不免于
无伤者或有直伤即入而寒便变热及始寒而终热者其郁热传阴与寒便变热则为热证其直伤阴经及从太阳即入少阴则为寒
证其太阳不能无伤则少阴脉证而兼见太阳标病其始为寒而终变热则先见寒证而后见热证此三阴之病所以或寒或热也苟
即三阴经篇诸条展转玩绎以求之理斯出矣夫其或传经或直伤或即入或先寒后热者何也邪气暴卒本无定情而传变不常故
耳故经曰邪之中人也无有常或中于阳或中于阴夫守真者绝类离伦之士也岂好为异说以骇人哉盖由其以温暑为伤寒而仲
景之方每不与温暑对故略乎温热之剂而例用寒凉由其以伤寒一断为热而无寒故谓仲景四逆汤为寒药误下表热里和之证
及为表热里寒自利之证而立又谓温里止利急解其表又谓寒病止为杂病嗟乎仲景伤寒论专为中而即病之伤寒作不兼为不
即病之温暑作故每有三阴之寒证而温热之剂之所以用也以病则寒以时则寒其用之也固宜后人不知此意是以愈求愈远愈
说愈凿若知此意则犹庖丁解牛动中肯綮矣且如寒药误下而成里寒者固诚为不免矣不因寒药误下而自为里寒者其可谓之
必无乎殊不知阴经之每见寒证者本因寒邪不由阳经直伤于此与夫虽由太阳而始不及郁热即入于此而致也虽或有因寒药
误下而致者盖亦甚少仲景所用诸温热之剂何尝每为寒药误下而立况表热里寒之证亦何尝每有急解其表之文乎夫里寒外
热之证乃是寒邪入客于内迫阳于外或者虚阳之气自作外热之状耳非真热邪所为也观仲景于里寒外热之证但以温药治里
寒而不治外热则知其所以为治之意矣若果当急解其表岂不于里和之后明言之乎且三阴寒病既是杂病何故亦载于伤寒论
以惑后人乎其厥阴病篇诸条之上又何故每以伤寒二字冠之乎夫内经所叙三阴病一于为热者言其常也仲景所叙三阴病兼
乎寒热者言其变也并行而不相悖耳后人谓伤寒本无寒证得非知常而不知变欤然世之恪守局方好用温热剂者乃反能幸全
于寒证无他其守彼虽偏治此则是学人能知三阴固有寒邪所为之证则仲景创法之本意可以了然于心目之间而不为他说所
夺矣或曰伤寒之病必从阳经郁热而传三阴今予谓直伤阴经即入阴经而为寒证其何据乎予曰据夫仲景耳仲景曰病发热恶
寒者发于阳也无热恶寒者发于阴也发于阳者七日愈发于阴者六日愈夫谓之无热恶寒则知其非阳经之郁热矣谓之发于阴
则知其不从阳经传至此矣谓之六日愈则知其不始太阳而止自阴经发病之日为始数之矣仲景又曰伤寒一二日至四五日而
厥者必发热伤寒病厥五日热亦五日设六日当复厥不厥者自愈伤寒厥四日热反三日复厥五日其病为进夫得伤寒未为热即
为厥者岂亦由传经入深之热邪而致此乎今世人多有始得病时便见诸寒证而并无或热者此则直伤阴经即入阴经者也苟不
能究夫仲景之心但执凡伤于寒则为病热之语以为治其不夭人天年者几希矣
【王肯堂按语】三阴病有传经而来的邪气,也有内感而来的邪气。所谓传经,是指从太阳经依次传入的;所谓内感,是指直中三阴,并非从阳经次第流传而来,而是因形体受寒、饮食生冷,损伤胃气所致。其脉证表现大致与伤寒外感之证相似,但仔细辨别则截然不同。然而这仅属于杂病范畴,并非《伤寒论》中受热邪侵袭的伤寒热病。
大凡邪气的产生,有的生于阴,有的生于阳。生于阳的,多由风雨寒暑引起;生于阴的,多由饮食起居、阴阳喜怒等情志因素引起。张仲景说:“发热而恶寒的,发于阳经;无热而恶寒的,发于阴经。”这三阴内感之证,从头到尾都没有发热,即使有发热,也是张仲景所说的“反发热”。只要考察“始得之”这三个字,就能明白了。内感之证始终只在一经,不再发生传变。为什么不传呢?因为阳气主动而阴气主静,所以阳经会传变而阴经不传变。如果按照伤寒的三阴三阳来论述,那么所传的不过是表里经络罢了。况且风寒六淫之邪中人,有时中于阳经,有时入于阴络,谁先谁后,怎么能专门以太阳经作为受邪的开始呢?因此各经都能受邪,然而邪气自太阳经开始的,比各经都多。大概开始虽然是从三阴中的热邪,也会传归阳明而后才停止。三阴经如果是中寒,决不会再有传变,三阴没有合并病的原因就在这里。
【王肯堂自述】我曾经阅读张仲景的《伤寒论》,在太阴篇中说:“自利不渴的,属于太阴,因为脏腑有寒,所以应当温补,适宜服用四逆汤之类的方剂。”在少阴篇中说:“少阴病得之一二日,口中和(口中不苦不燥),背部恶寒的,应当施灸,并用附子汤主治。”“少阴病身体痛,手足寒冷,骨节疼痛,脉沉的,用附子汤主治。”“少阴病下利的,用白通汤主治。”“少阴病下利,脉微弱的,给予白通汤;若下利不止,四肢厥冷,无脉,干呕,心烦的,用白通加猪胆汁汤主治。”“少阴下利清谷,里有寒而外有热,手足厥冷,脉微欲绝,身体反而不恶寒,其人面色赤,或者腹痛,或者干呕,或者咽痛,或者利止而脉不出者,用通脉四逆汤主治。”“少阴病脉沉的,应当急温,适宜用四逆汤。”在厥阴篇中说:“手足厥寒,脉细欲绝的,用当归四逆汤主治。”“大汗出或严重下利而导致四肢厥冷的,用四逆汤主治。”观察张仲景的这些论述,可知伤寒三阴病必有寒证,适宜使用温热药剂。
等到我阅读刘守真(刘完素)的著作时,他说:“伤寒邪热在表腑为阳邪,邪热在里脏为阴邪。世俗人错误地认为有寒热阴阳不同的证候,误导人很久了。寒病是存在的,但不是指汗病(外感热病)。寒病仅限于杂病,终究不能称为汗病。况且造化汁液之气的是阳热之气,不是阴寒所能产生的。虽然张仲景有四逆汤证,那是治疗表热里和,误用寒药攻下太早,导致表热入里,下利不止;或者是表热里寒,自利,急忙用四逆汤温里,利止里和后,再急解其表。所以张仲景的四逆汤证之后,又有用承气汤攻下的情况。由此看来,伤寒汗病经文中直言是热病,而不说是寒病。经文说三阴证,是因为邪热在脏在里,以脏与里为阴,应当攻下热邪。《素问》论伤寒热病有两篇,名叫《热病》,完全没有提到寒,道理兼合《素问》及《灵枢》诸篇运气造化的原理,推究起来就是热病,确实不是寒病。”观察刘守真的这些论述,可知伤寒无论病在表在里,以及三阳三阴,全都统一为热,决没有寒的情况。
这两种说法不同,是非的判断必然有一方是正确的。因此我反复推敲探究其中的义理,很久都不能得到答案。即使到了精神疲惫、气息耗损的地步,也不肯放下,自以为这是伤寒的大纲领。这个义理如果不明白,那么千言万语都不足以成为后学的榜样,更何况残害百姓生命,哪有穷尽的时候呢!我想成无己的注解一定有发明之处,于是顺着他的解释去寻求,但也只是随着文意略微解释,竟然不明确说明为什么为热、为什么为寒。这并不是他不想说,大概是只知道伤寒都是传经所致,所以怀疑六经所传的都是热证,而热不会变成寒的道理,所以不敢分辨清楚。
如果认为是本脏之寒,那么在热邪传里入深的时候,怎么会唯独见到寒而不见热呢?而且所使用的温热药物,难道不会助长传经的热邪吗?如果认为是外邪之寒,那么在三阳阶段已经成热了,怎么传到三阴反而变成寒了呢?成无己如果能潜心研究这个问题,一定会领悟其中的原因。自从张仲景撰写《伤寒论》以来,没有人不尊崇它,直到异同争论兴起,像捕鱼的人奔向深渊,伐木的人奔向深山一样各自寻找依据。难怪后人不能在似是而非之际做出决断,所以有人说当今世上并没有真正的伤寒病,又有人说今人所得的病都是内伤,还有愚昧的人甚至说《伤寒论》中的各种温热药都是为了传经热邪而使用的,理由是三阴经属阴。更荒谬的说法是:凡是论著中有“寒”字的,都当作“热”字来看待。唉!末流的弊端竟然到了这种地步!
于是我澄澈心灵,冷静思考,沉浸其中。有一天豁然开朗,好像有所领悟,但也不敢肯定是否正确。姑且陈述出来,请有道之人指正。
夫三阳病,其寒邪在太阳经,寒郁遏阳气,阳气不畅而成热。阳气虽然是人身正气,既然被郁遏就成为邪气了。用麻黄发表以驱逐寒邪,则腠理通畅而郁热发泄,所以出汗而痊愈。如果不汗出不解,其热不得外泄,则必入里,所以传阳明、传少阳,或者入腑。至于三阴病,为什么有的寒有的热呢?大概寒邪伤人,有的先在太阳经郁热,然后依次传到阴经;有的太阳不传阳明少阳,就直接传三阴经;有的寒邪不从阳经开始,直接伤害阴经;有的虽然从太阳开始,来不及郁热,就进入少阴而单独出现少阴证;有的开始自太阳即入少阴,而太阳不免于未受伤;有的直接伤害随即进入,寒便变为热,以及开始为寒最终变为热的。那些郁热传阴与寒便变热的,就属于热证;那些直伤阴经及从太阳即入少阴的,就属于寒证。那些太阳不能无伤的,则少阴脉证兼见太阳标病;那些开始为寒最终变热的,则先见寒证而后见热证。这就是三阴病所以有的寒有的热的原因。如果就在三阴经篇的各条文中辗转玩味推求,以求其理,那么道理就出来了。
至于有的传经,有的直伤,有的即入,有的先寒后热,为什么呢?因为邪气暴卒,本来没有固定的情状,而传变不常的缘故。所以经文说:“邪气中人,没有固定规律,有的中于阳,有的中于阴。”
刘守真是位超群绝伦的士人,哪里喜欢提出异说以惊骇世人呢?大概是由他把温病暑病当作伤寒,而张仲景的方子往往不与温病暑病相对,所以他略去了温热药剂,而例用寒凉。因为他把伤寒一概断定为热而无寒,所以说张仲景的四逆汤是寒药,是误治表热里和之证,以及为表热里寒自利之证而立。又说温里止利后急解其表,又说寒病仅限于杂病。唉!张仲景《伤寒论》专为中寒即病的伤寒而作,不兼为不即病的温暑而作,所以每有三阴的寒证,而温热药剂之所以使用,是因为病则是寒,时令也是寒,使用它固然适宜。后人不知道这个意思,所以越求越远,越说越凿。如果知道这个意思,就像庖丁解牛,动作合乎筋骨结构一样准确。
况且如寒药误下而成里寒的,固然是难免的,但不因寒药误下而自己成为里寒的,难道可以说一定没有吗?殊不知阴经每每见到寒证,原本是因为寒邪不由阳经直接伤害于此,或者是虽然由太阳开始,来不及郁热就进入于此而导致的。虽然有因为寒药误下而导致的,但也很少。张仲景所用的各种温热药剂,何尝每次都是为寒药误下而立的?况且表热里寒之证,又何尝每次都有急解其表的文字呢?
所谓里寒外热之证,乃是寒邪侵入体内,逼迫阳气于外,或者是虚阳之气自作外热之状罢了,并不是真正的热邪所为。看张仲景对于里寒外热之证,只用温药治疗里寒,而不治疗外热,就知道他治疗的意思了。如果果当急解其表,难道不在里和之后明确说明吗?
况且三阴寒病既然是杂病,为什么也记载在《伤寒论》中以迷惑后人呢?其厥阴病篇各条之上,为什么每每以“伤寒”二字冠之呢?《内经》所叙述的三阴病统一为热,是说它的常态;张仲景所叙述的三阴病兼乎寒热,是说它的变态。两者并行而不相违背。后人说伤寒本来没有寒证,岂不是知常而不知变吗?
然而世上恪守局方、好用温热药剂的人,反而能在寒证中侥幸保全,没有其他原因,是他们坚守彼法虽偏,但能治此证。若是学人能知道三阴固有寒邪所致的证候,那么张仲景创法的基本意图就可以在心目中了然,而不被其他学说所夺。
有人问:“伤寒的病必定从阳经郁热而传三阴,现在你说直伤阴经、即入阴经而为寒证,有什么依据?”我说:“依据张仲景。”张仲景说:“病发热恶寒的,发于阳经;无热恶寒的,发于阴经。发于阳的七日愈,发于阴的六日愈。”称其为无热恶寒,就知道它不是阳经的郁热;称其为发于阴,就知道它不从阳经传至此;称其为六日愈,就知道它不始于太阳,而是自阴经发病之日开始计算。张仲景又说:“伤寒一二日至四五日而厥的,必发热。伤寒病厥五日,热亦五日,设六日当复厥,不厥者自愈。伤寒厥四日,热反三日,复厥五日,其病为进。”得到伤寒未为热即为厥的,难道是也由传经入深的热邪而导致这样的吗?
现今世人多有开始得病时就见各种寒证而并无发热的,这就是直伤阴经、即入阴经的人。如果不能探究张仲景的心意,只是执着于“凡伤于寒则为病热”的话,用来治病,那能不夭折人的寿命的就很少了。
[Wang Kentang's Commentary] Shaoyin, Shaoyang, and Taiyin (Three Yin meridians) diseases involve pathogenic factors transmitted via meridian transmission (pathogens spreading sequentially from one meridian to another) and those caused by internal infection (direct invasion of pathogens into the interior without passing through the Yang meridians). Transmission refers to pathogens entering from the Taiyang (Greater Yang) meridian sequentially. Internal infection refers to direct invasion of the Three Yin meridians, not spreading step-by-step from the Yang meridians, but resulting from cold exposure and consumption of cold drinks or food, which damages the Stomach Qi (vital energy of the stomach). The pulse and symptoms are roughly similar to those of external contraction in Shanghan (Cold Damage), but careful differentiation reveals distinct differences. However, these belong to miscellaneous diseases (Zabing), not the heat diseases of Shanghan caused by cold invasion.
Generally, pathogens arise either from Yin or from Yang. Those arising from Yang result from wind, rain, cold, and summer-heat. Those arising from Yin result from diet, living conditions, and emotional fluctuations such as joy, anger, etc. Zhang Zhongjing stated: "Fever accompanied by aversion to cold indicates onset in the Yang; absence of fever with aversion to cold indicates onset in the Yin." In cases of internal infection involving the Three Yin, there is typically no fever throughout. If fever occurs, it is what Zhang Zhongjing termed "contrary fever" (Fan Re). Examining the phrase "at the beginning" clarifies this. Internal infection remains confined to a single meridian without further transmission. Why does it not transmit? Because Yang Qi is dynamic while Yin Qi is static; thus, Yang meridians transmit while Yin meridians do not. If discussing according to the framework of the Three Yin and Three Yang in Shanghan, transmission involves only the exterior-interior relationships of the meridians. Moreover, when Wind-Cold and the Six Excesses invade humans, they may strike the Yang meridians or enter the Yin collaterals. Who comes first, who comes second? How can one exclusively regard the Taiyang meridian as the starting point of pathogen invasion? Therefore, all meridians can be invaded. However, invasions starting from Taiyang are more common than others. Generally, even if heat pathogens originate within the Three Yin, they will eventually transmit to the Yangming (Yang Brightness) meridian before subsiding. Cold invasion of the Three Yin meridians never transmits further; this is why there are no combined diseases in the Three Yin.
[I recount my own experience] I once read Zhang Zhongjing's *Treatise on Cold Damage* (*Shanghan Lun*). In the Taiyin chapter, it states: "Spontaneous diarrhea without thirst belongs to Taiyin because of cold in the Zang organs; therefore, it should be warmed, and formulas like Sini Tang (Four Counterflow Decoction) are appropriate." In the Shaoyin chapter, it states: "Shaoyin disease, occurring one or two days after onset, with a normal mouth (no bitterness or dryness) and aversion to cold in the back, should be treated with moxibustion and Fuzi Tang (Aconite Decoction)." "Shaoyin disease with body pain, cold hands and feet, bone and joint pain, and a deep pulse is treated with Fuzi Tang." "Shaoyin disease with diarrhea is treated with Baitong Tang (White Onion Decoction)." "Shaoyin disease with diarrhea and a faint pulse is given Baitong Tang; if diarrhea persists, leading to cold limbs, absent pulse, dry heaving, and irritability, Baitong Jia Zhuyedanhuang Tang (Baitong Tang plus Pig Gallbladder Bile Decoction) is used." "Shaoyin diarrhea with undigested food, interior cold with exterior heat, cold limbs, faint and nearly imperceptible pulse, yet the body feels no aversion to cold, and the face is red, or with abdominal pain, dry heaving, sore throat, or cessation of diarrhea with absent pulse, is treated with Tongmai Sini Tang (Pulse-Recovering Four Counterflow Decoction)." "Shaoyin disease with a deep pulse requires urgent warming with Sini Tang." In the Jueyin chapter, it states: "Cold limbs and a fine, nearly absent pulse are treated with Danggui Sini Tang (Angelica Sinensis Counterflow-Warming Decoction)." "Profuse sweating or severe diarrhea leading to cold limbs is treated with Sini Tang." Observing these statements, it is clear that Three Yin diseases in Shanghan must involve cold syndromes suitable for warm-hot remedies.
Later, reading Liu Shouzhen's (Liu Wansu's) works, he stated: "Pathogenic heat in the exterior and Fu organs constitutes Yang pathogenic heat; pathogenic heat in the interior and Zang organs constitutes Yin pathogenic heat. Laypeople mistakenly believe there are distinct cold and hot Yin-Yang syndromes, misleading people for a long time. Cold diseases exist, but they do not refer to Hanbing (sweating diseases/external febrile diseases). Cold diseases are limited to miscellaneous illnesses and cannot be classified as Hanbing. Furthermore, the Qi that generates bodily fluids is Yang-Heat Qi, not something produced by Yin-Cold. Although Zhang Zhongjing has Sini Tang indications, these treat cases where exterior heat and interior harmony were mistaken for cold and purged too early with cold herbs, causing exterior heat to enter the interior and persistent diarrhea; or cases of exterior heat and interior cold with spontaneous diarrhea, where Sini Tang is urgently used to warm the interior. Once diarrhea stops and the interior harmonizes, the exterior is then resolved. Thus, after Sini Tang indications, Chengqi Tang (Garlic Decoction) purgatives follow. Consequently, Shanghan Hanbing texts explicitly mention heat diseases, not cold diseases. When scriptures mention Three Yin syndromes, it is because pathogenic heat is in the Zang and interior, which are Yin, requiring purgation of heat. The *Suwen* (Basic Questions) has two chapters on Shanghan heat diseases titled 'Re Bing' (Heat Disease), mentioning no cold. Reasoning from the *Suwen* and *Lingshu* (Spiritual Pivot) regarding Yungu (Luck and Transformation) principles, it is indeed heat disease, certainly not cold." From Liu Shouzhen's argument, it appears that Shanghan, whether in the exterior or interior, and regardless of the Three Yang or Three Yin, is uniformly heat, with absolutely no cold.
These two theories differ, and one must be correct. I repeatedly investigated and questioned their meanings but could not resolve them for a long time. Even until mentally exhausted and qi depleted, I did not abandon the effort, believing this was the general principle of Shanghan. Without understanding this principle, thousands of words would not serve as models for future learners, let alone prevent harm to people's lives. I assumed Cheng Wuji's commentary must have some insights, so I sought them there. However, he merely explained the text superficially and never clearly stated why it is heat or why it is cold. This was not because he didn't want to say, but because he believed Shanghan always involves meridian transmission, suspecting that all transmissions across the Six Meridians result in heat syndromes, and since heat does not transform into cold, he dared not distinguish otherwise.
If we consider it cold originating from the Zang itself, how can one see only cold and no heat when heat pathogens transmit deeply into the interior? Would the warm-hot medicines used not aid the heat pathogens of meridian transmission? If we consider it cold from external pathogens, by the time it reaches the Three Yang, it has already become heat. How could it turn to cold upon reaching the Three Yin? If Cheng had pondered this deeply, he would have realized the reason. Since Zhang Zhongjing wrote *Shanghan Lun*, no one has neglected it without revering it. But when debates on similarities and differences arose, seekers went to the abyss like fishers, and woodcutters to the mountains. No wonder later generations could not decide between plausible and implausible interpretations. Some claimed true Shanghan disease does not exist today; others said current diseases are all internal injuries. Ignorant people even claimed that all warm medicines in *Shanghan Lun* are used for meridian-transmitted heat because the Three Yin belong to Yin. The most absurd claim was: "Any mention of 'cold' in the text should be read as 'heat'." Alas, how far has the decline reached!
Thus, I cleared my mind and contemplated deeply. Suddenly, it became clear as if I had an epiphany, though I dared not be certain of its correctness. I tentatively present it here for correction by those with the Way.
Regarding Three Yang diseases, when cold pathogens are in the Taiyang meridian, cold stagnates Yang Qi, causing obstruction and generating heat. Although Yang Qi is righteous Qi in the body, once obstructed, it becomes pathogenic. Using Mahuang (Ephedra) to release the exterior expels cold, opening the pores and venting stagnant heat, leading to cure through sweating. If sweating does not occur and the condition does not resolve, the heat cannot escape outward and must enter the interior, transmitting to Yangming or Shaoyang (Lesser Yang), or entering the Fu organs.
As for Three Yin diseases, why are some cold and some hot? Generally, when cold pathogens injure humans, sometimes they cause stagnant heat in Taiyang before transmitting sequentially to Yin meridians; sometimes Taiyang does not transmit to Yangming or Shaoyang but directly to the Three Yin; sometimes cold pathogens do not start from Yang meridians but directly injure Yin meridians; sometimes starting from Taiyang, without sufficient time for heat stagnation, they enter Shaoyin, presenting only Shaoyin symptoms; sometimes starting from Taiyang, they enter Shaoyin immediately, while Taiyang remains uninjured; sometimes direct injury leads immediately to heat transformation, starting as cold but ending as heat. Cases of stagnant heat transmitting to Yin or cold transforming to heat constitute heat syndromes. Cases of direct Yin injury or immediate entry from Taiyang to Shaoyin constitute cold syndromes. When Taiyang is inevitably injured, Shaoyin pulse/symptoms appear alongside Taiyang marker diseases. When starting as cold and ending as heat, cold symptoms appear first, followed by heat symptoms. This explains why Three Yin diseases can be either cold or hot. By carefully studying the various clauses in the Three Yin chapters, the rationale emerges.
Why do some transmit via meridians, some suffer direct injury, some enter immediately, and some go from cold to heat? Pathogens strike suddenly and unpredictably, and their transmission is irregular. Hence, the classics state: "Pathogens invading humans have no constancy; some strike Yang, some strike Yin."
Liu Shouzhen was a scholar of exceptional caliber. Did he enjoy making异说 (heterodox theories) to shock people? Probably not. He likely equated Wenbing (Warm Diseases) and Shubing (Summer-heat Diseases) with Shanghan. Since Zhang Zhongjing's formulas often did not match Warm/Summer-heat treatments, he omitted warm-hot agents and routinely used cold-cool ones. By categorizing all Shanghan as heat without cold, he argued that Zhang Zhongjing's Sini Tang was a cold formula, mistakenly treating exterior heat with interior harmony, or establishing it for exterior heat with interior cold diarrhea. He also claimed that warming the interior to stop diarrhea and urgently resolving the exterior, and stating cold diseases are only miscellaneous illnesses, were errors. Alas! Zhang Zhongjing's *Shanghan Lun* was specifically written for Shanghan contracted immediately upon cold exposure, not for non-immediate Warm/Summer-heat diseases. Therefore, Three Yin cold syndromes exist, and warm-hot agents are used because the disease is cold and the season is cold; their use is appropriate. Later generations, unaware of this, seek further away and dig deeper into misconceptions. If they understood this, it would be like Cook Ding carving an ox—moving precisely along the natural joints.
For instance, if cold herbs are mistakenly used to purge, causing interior cold, this is unavoidable. But can we say interior cold arising without such mistake is impossible? We must realize that cold syndromes frequently seen in Yin meridians originally result from cold pathogens directly injuring these meridians bypassing Yang, or from Taiyang failing to generate heat before entering directly. Cases due to mistaken purging with cold herbs are rare. Were the warm-hot agents Zhang Zhongjing used primarily established for mistaken purging? And did exterior heat with interior cold cases always require urgent exterior resolution? The syndrome of interior cold with exterior heat is actually cold pathogens invading internally, forcing Yang Qi outward, or deficient Yang Qi manifesting as false exterior heat, not true heat pathogens. Zhang Zhongjing treated interior cold with warm medicines without addressing the exterior heat in such cases, revealing his intent. If urgent exterior resolution were required, would he not have explicitly stated it after the interior harmonized?
Furthermore, if Three Yin cold diseases are miscellaneous illnesses, why are they recorded in *Shanghan Lun* to confuse later generations? Why do the Jueyin chapter clauses begin with the word "Shanghan"? The *Neijing* describes Three Yin diseases as uniformly heat, representing the norm. Zhang Zhongjing describes them as mixed heat and cold, representing variations. They coexist without contradiction. Later generations claiming Shanghan has no cold syndromes know the norm but ignore the variation.
However, those who strictly adhere to Bureau Formulas and favor warm-hot agents often survive cold syndromes. This is not without reason; although their theory is biased, it treats this specific syndrome. If learners understand that Three Yin inherently has cold syndromes caused by cold pathogens, Zhang Zhongjing's original intent becomes clear, preventing deviation by other theories.
Someone asked: "Shanghan diseases must transmit from Yang meridian stagnant heat to Three Yin. Now you claim direct Yin injury and immediate entry lead to cold syndromes. What is your evidence?" I replied: "Evidence from Zhang Zhongjing." Zhang Zhongjing said: "Disease with fever and aversion to cold originates in Yang; disease without fever and with aversion to cold originates in Yin. Originating in Yang heals in seven days; originating in Yin heals in six days." "Without fever and with aversion to cold" indicates it is not Yang stagnant heat. "Originating in Yin" indicates it did not transmit from Yang meridians. "Healing in six days" indicates it did not start from Taiyang but began counting from the day of Yin meridian onset. Zhang Zhongjing also said: "In Shanghan, jue (cold limbs) appearing between day 1-5 implies subsequent fever. If jue lasts five days and fever lasts five days, and on day 6 jue returns, the patient heals. If jue lasts four days, fever three days, and jue returns for five days, the disease progresses." Can getting Shanghan and immediately developing jue without prior fever be attributed to deep-transmitted heat pathogens? Many modern patients present with cold syndromes from the onset without any fever; this is direct Yin injury and immediate entry. If one fails to comprehend Zhang Zhongjing's intent and rigidly adheres to "all cold damage results in heat disease," few will avoid premature death.