近邻一菜佣林姓崇祯癸未春首患伤寒六日困殆。始延医。医以贫故无心详诊。每每辞不
治而
去。余适外出闻其母悲泣。因入视之。病者目瞑耳聋。舌有黄苔。燥渴索水。绝食两日。少
动则呼。胸腹胁肋皆痛。大便下赤水。小便亦赤涩。幸囊未缩。脉沉缓。余济以大柴胡汤灌
下。少顷下燥粪目开耳能闻。再与小柴汤三帖而全愈。可见生死自有定数。不然几误于诸医
之说矣。此三阴症具谁谓三阴无合病乎方书谓三阴无合病是尽信书则不如无书矣。
两感与夹阴异。两感为表里俱受寒邪。夹阴为外感寒邪内伤寒冷。故两感多用辛凉。夹阴必用
温热。至两感用辛凉不瘳。夹阴投温热无效。均入死法也。
甲申仲冬西水关一王姓男子。年二十余。患前症。头目疼痛。发热如焚。口渴燥闷。胸
腹满
胀。脉浮紧沉。按亦实。历只两日。延余延医。时有一老医误以为白虎症。余曰白虎症当无
大热。只口燥渴。或自汗心烦。背微恶寒。始为白虎。即拟为太阳阳明合病。则当于表里症
中。添一协热下利症。方是合病。此明明是大青龙症故首日头痛发热。而只口干胸满今日便
增鼻干不眠。烦渴腹胀非一日太阳太阴俱病二日阳明少阴俱病乎公奈何伤寒论不读也。但喜
患者英年气实。症未至引衣蜷卧尚为可救。余以大青龙汤加柴芍陈皮半夏一剂与服。应手而
愈。是冬腊十七日。复有一舆夫亦患前症。初治皆发表平缓之剂。历四日。余适他出。因入
视之。备询前症。及阅前方。皆邈不与病相符。六脉滑大无力。呕渴囊缩。昏不知人余断以
六日当死。彼仍延他医。以为风痰用吐法。至次日即殁。前病最属危恶。古今诸贤。咸称不
治。余以为禀赋尚健。冒触方新。未经妄药。胃气犹存尚犹可治则水关之男子是也若年力渐
衰。邪气入深。误服舛剂。真气消亡此舆夫所以殒命于刀圭也。夫大青龙汤虽曰峻厉。第有是病
而用是药。奈何易老仅以羌活冲和汤代之。是亦胆小之过。而未详长沙制方之微义矣。
邻居一位姓林的菜贩,在崇祯癸未年(1643年)初春患伤寒病六天,病情危重。起初请医生诊治,医生因为患者贫穷,无心详细诊察,常常推辞不治而离开。我恰好外出回来,听到他的母亲悲伤哭泣,便进去查看。病人双眼紧闭,耳朵听不见声音,舌苔黄燥,极度口渴想喝水,已经两天没吃东西,稍微活动就呼叫疼痛,胸部、腹部、胁肋部都疼痛,大便排出红褐色水样物,小便也赤红涩痛。幸好阴囊没有收缩,脉象沉缓。我用大柴胡汤灌服下去。过了一会儿,排出了干结的粪便,眼睛睁开,耳朵能听见声音了。再服用小柴胡汤三剂,完全痊愈。可见生死自有定数,否则几乎被各位医生的说法误导了。这里三阴的症状都具备,谁说三阴没有合病呢?医书说三阴没有合病,这是尽信书不如无书啊。
两感伤寒与夹阴证不同。两感是表里同时感受寒邪;夹阴是外感寒邪,内伤生冷。所以两感多用辛凉解表法,夹阴必用温热散寒法。如果两感用了辛凉法不愈,夹阴用了温热法无效,都属于死症。
甲申年(1644年)仲冬,西水关有一位姓王的男子,二十多岁,患了前面的病症。头痛目痛,发热如火烧,口渴烦躁胸闷,胸腹胀满,脉象浮紧且沉取有力,按之亦实。病程仅两天,才来请我诊治。当时有一位老医生误认为是白虎汤证。我说:白虎汤证应当没有大热,只是口燥渴,或者自汗、心烦、背部微恶寒,这才算是白虎汤证。如果是太阳阳明合病,应当在表里症状中,添上一个协热下利的症状,这才是合病。这明明是大青龙汤证,所以第一天头痛发热,只是口干胸满;今天又增加了鼻干、失眠、烦渴、腹胀,这不是一日太阳太阴俱病,二日阳明少阴俱病吗?您为什么不读《伤寒论》呢?但庆幸患者年轻气盛,症状还没有发展到蜷缩卧床的程度,还可以救治。我用大青龙汤加柴胡、芍药、陈皮、半夏,一剂药服下,立刻痊愈。
这年腊月十七日,又有一位轿夫也患了同样的病症。起初治疗都用发表平缓的药剂,过了四天,我恰好外出,回去查看时,详细询问了之前的症状,并查阅了之前的方子,都与病情不相符。六脉滑大无力,呕吐、口渴、阴囊收缩,昏迷不省人事。我判断他第六天会死。他们仍然请其他医生,认为是风痰,用了吐法。到了第二天就死了。前面的病最属危险恶劣,古今贤人都称为不治之症。我认为如果禀赋健壮,刚受新邪,未经过乱用药物的损伤,胃气尚存,还是可以治疗的,就像西水关的那个男子一样。如果年力渐衰,邪气入深,误服错误的药剂,真气消亡,这就是那位轿夫死于医药之下的原因。大青龙汤虽然说是峻烈之剂,但是有病则用此药,为什么易水学派的李东垣仅仅用羌活冲和汤替代呢?这也是胆子小的过错,而没有详究张仲景制方的微义啊。
A vegetable vendor surnamed Lin, my neighbor, suffered from Shanghan (Cold Damage) for six days in the early spring of the Guiwei year of the Chongzhen era (1643), becoming critically ill. Initially, a physician was summoned. Due to the patient's poverty, the physician lacked the motivation to examine him in detail and often declined treatment before leaving. I happened to return from an outing and heard his mother weeping bitterly, so I went in to inspect him. The patient had his eyes closed and ears deafened, a yellow and dry tongue coating, extreme thirst with a desire for water, had not eaten for two days, cried out upon slight movement, and experienced pain throughout the chest, abdomen, and hypochondrium. His stool consisted of red-brown watery discharge, and his urine was red and scanty/painful. Fortunately, his scrotum was not retracted, and his pulse was deep and slow. I administered Dachaihu Tang (Minor Bupleurum and Rhubarb Decoction) via灌下 (forced ingestion). After a short while, he passed dry feces, opened his eyes, and could hear again. He then took three doses of Xiaochaihu Tang (Minor Bupleurum Decoction) and made a complete recovery. This demonstrates that life and death are predetermined; otherwise, he would have been misled by the opinions of other physicians. Here, symptoms of all three Yin meridians were present. Who says there is no combined disease (Hebing) of the Three Yin? Medical texts state that there is no combined disease of the Three Yin; this is an example of believing books too literally, which is worse than having no books at all.
Lianggan (Double Impact) differs from Jiayin (Clamped Yin). Lianggan involves the simultaneous contraction of cold pathogenic factors in both the exterior and interior. Jiayin involves external contraction of cold pathogenic factors and internal injury caused by consuming cold substances. Therefore, Lianggan is mostly treated with Acrid-Cool methods, while Jiayin must be treated with Warm-Hot methods. If Lianggan does not respond to Acrid-Cool treatments, or if Jiayin does not respond to Warm-Hot treatments, both constitute fatal conditions.
In mid-winter of the Jiashen year (1644), a man surnamed Wang at Xishuiguan, aged over twenty, suffered from the aforementioned condition. He experienced headache and eye pain, fever burning like fire, thirst, dryness, irritability, chest stuffiness, and abdominal distension. His pulse was floating and tight, and deep pressure revealed fullness and solidity. The illness had lasted only two days when he sought my consultation. At that time, an elderly physician mistakenly diagnosed it as Baihu Tang Syndrome (White Tiger Decoction Syndrome). I said: Baihu Tang Syndrome should present without high fever, merely with dry mouth and thirst, or spontaneous sweating, irritability, and slight aversion to cold on the back. Only then can it be considered Baihu Tang Syndrome. If it were a combined disease of Taiyang and Yangming, there should be a symptom of diarrhea with heat binding among the exterior and interior symptoms; only then would it be a combined disease. This is clearly Daqinglong Tang Syndrome (Major Blue-Green Dragon Decoction Syndrome). Hence, on the first day, there was headache and fever, but only dry mouth and chest fullness; today, nasal dryness, insomnia, irritability, thirst, and abdominal distension have increased. Is this not a case where Taiyang and Taiyin are diseased on the first day, and Yangming and Shaoyin are diseased on the second day? Why do you not read the *Shanghan Lun* (Treatise on Cold Damage)? Fortunately, the patient was young and vigorous, and his symptoms had not yet progressed to curling up and lying still, so he was still salvageable. I prescribed Daqinglong Tang added with Chaihu (Bupleuri Radix), Shaoyao (Paeoniae Radix), Chenpi (Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium), and Banxia (Pinelliae Rhizoma). One dose resulted in immediate recovery.
On the seventeenth day of the twelfth lunar month of that winter, another sedan-chair porter suffered from the same condition. Initial treatments used mild exterior-releasing agents. After four days, I happened to return from an outing and inspected him. Upon detailed inquiry into previous symptoms and review of previous prescriptions, none matched the current condition. All six pulses were slippery, large, and powerless. He experienced vomiting, thirst, scrotal retraction, and unconsciousness. I judged that he would die on the sixth day. They continued to consult other physicians who attributed it to wind-phlegm and used emetic therapy. He died the next day. The former condition was extremely critical and dangerous; ancient and modern experts alike called it untreatable. However, I believed that if constitution is robust, the new pathogen has just invaded, and there has been no misuse of drugs, the Stomach Qi remains intact, making it treatable, as was the case with the man at Xishuiguan. Conversely, if physical strength declines, pathogens penetrate deeply, and incorrect medications are taken, leading to the depletion of True Qi, this explains why the porter perished due to medical intervention. Although Daqinglong Tang is considered a harsh/decoction, one must use the appropriate medicine for the specific disease. Why did Li Dongyuan (from the Yishui School) merely substitute it with Qianghuo Chonghe Tang (Notopterygium and Harmonizing Decoction)? This was also a fault of timidity, failing to thoroughly investigate the subtle principles of Zhang Zhongjing's formula construction.