黄,黄胖也。疸,五疸也。《金匮》原有诸黄、诸疸之别,特疸详而黄略,读者易混,
因误
认诸黄为即五疸中之黄胆耳!考《病源》黄病候,自黄病至治也,百四十六字,列症甚详,
必
本之《金匮》逸文。何以言之?一身尽疼,发热,目涩,鼻疼,两膊及项强,腰背急,乃太
阳阳明表证,而《金匮》有黄家脉浮,当以汗解,宜桂枝加黄 汤一条,证治相符。大便涩
,正阳阳明胃家实症也,而《金匮》有诸黄猪膏发煎主之一条,证治相符。《金匮》既详其
治,不应反阙其证,故疑巢说本《金匮》逸文。且以此推之,黄病固有与伤寒同法者,故伤
寒亦多病黄。若五疸中之黄胆,则与余疸同属杂病,自不若黄病初起可以伤寒法治之,此其
别也。巢于黄病外别有黄胆,与女劳疸、酒疸、谷疸、黑疸同列,而以《灵》、《素》所言
黄胆诸条,及《金匮》所言疸而渴者以下三十五字入之黄胆候,较之黄病论绝异,其分别甚
严,真善读仲景书者。后人误认《金匮》标目黄胆二字,即五疸中黄胆,因以篇中诸黄云云
,皆认为五疸中黄胆,而黄与五疸之治法淆矣。不效,必曰古方难用也,故读书须取其至是
者。
人但知黄胆之有阴阳,而不知阴阳之何所指也。一闻“阴”字,即确认为虚症而不疑。
此不
独于疸为然,而疸之害尤甚。盖疸本湿热所为,无问阴阳,皆当以治湿热为正。的系阴黄,
则
湿热入深,其候重于阳黄可知,一投补剂,收住湿热,当时虽瘥,而病根终身不拔矣。余见
甚多,而卒不可夺。噫!人亦思阴阳之论何自 哉?《金匮》云∶疸病发于阴部,其人必呕;
发于阳部,其人振寒而发热。然则二疸之别,别于症之浅深,不别于气之虚实。阴以五脏言
,谓肺也;阳以六经言,谓三阳经也。仲景书中固有此例。如伤寒发热恶寒发于阳,无热恶
寒发于阴;咽喉痛,面赤有斑为阳毒,面青身痛为阴毒。皆是也。后世不明此义,每遇阴症
之名,不以为寒而用热药,即以为虚而用补药。元明以来,比比然矣。景岳于阴黄多制补剂
,其意岂欲误人哉?良由误认一时之收住为功且速,而不知能料他日复发之真明且远也。《
大学》贵知至,信然!
“黄”,指的是面色萎黄浮肿;“疸”,指的是五种黄疸病。《金匮要略》中原本就有“诸黄”与“诸疸”的区别,只是关于“疸”的论述详细而关于“黄”的论述简略,读者容易混淆,因而错误地认为所有的“黄”就是五疸中的“黄胆”。考证《诸病源候论》中关于黄病的病候描述,从黄病名称到治疗方法共一百四十六字,症状列举非常详尽,这必定是依据《金匮要略》中散佚的文字。为什么这样说呢?身体疼痛、发热、眼睛干涩、鼻子疼痛、两膊及颈部僵硬、腰背拘急,这是太阳经和阳明经的表证,而《金匮要略》中有“患黄病脉象浮,应当用发汗法解除,适宜用桂枝加黄芪汤”这一条,病症与治疗相符合。大便干涩难解,这是阳明的胃家实证,而《金匮要略》中有“各种黄病用猪膏发煎主治”这一条,病症与治疗也相符合。《金匮要略》既然详细记载了治法,不应该反而缺失其病症描述,所以我怀疑巢元方的说法是依据《金匮要略》的散佚文字。并且由此推断,黄病本来有与伤寒治疗相同的方法,所以伤寒病中也多伴有发黄的症状。如果是五疸中的黄胆,则与其他四种疸一样属于杂病,自然不像黄病初起时可以用治疗伤寒的方法来治疗,这就是它们的区别。巢元方在黄病之外另列黄胆,将其与女劳疸、酒疸、谷疸、黑疸并列,并将《灵枢》、《素问》中关于黄胆的条文,以及《金匮要略》中关于“疸而渴者”以下的三十五字纳入黄病候中,这与黄病的论述截然不同,区分非常严格,确实是善于研读仲景书籍的人。后人错误地认为《金匮要略》标题中的“黄胆”二字,就是五疸中的黄胆,因此将篇中提到的各种“黄”都认为是五疸中的黄胆,导致“黄”与“五疸”的治疗方法混淆了。治疗无效,一定说是古方难以使用,所以读书必须选取那些最正确的观点。
人们只知道黄胆有阴黄和阳黄之分,却不知道阴阳具体指代什么。一听到“阴”字,就确认为虚证而不怀疑。这不仅对于黄疸是这样,而且黄疸的危害尤其严重。因为黄疸本是由湿热引起的,无论阴黄阳黄,都应当以治疗湿热为正途。如果是真正的阴黄,那么湿热深入体内,其病情比阳黄严重可知,一旦投用补剂,就会使湿热闭阻在内,当时虽然看似好转,但病根终身无法拔除。我见过很多这样的例子,最终却无法挽回。唉!人们是否思考过阴阳的理论是从哪里来的呢?《金匮要略》说:“黄疸病发于阴部,病人必然呕吐;发于阳部,病人恶寒且发热。”既然如此,这两种疸的区别,在于病症的浅深不同,而不在于气机的虚实不同。阴是指五脏而言,这里指肺脏;阳是指六经而言,这里指三阳经。仲景书中本来就有这样的先例。比如伤寒发热恶寒发于阳经,无热恶寒发于阴经;咽喉痛、面部发红有斑疹为阳毒,面色青暗、身体疼痛为阴毒。都是这种情况。后世不明白这个意义,每当遇到“阴症”的名称,不是把它当作寒证而用热药,就是把它当作虚证而用补药。自元代、明代以来,这种情况比比皆是。张景岳对于阴黄多制定补益药剂,他的意思难道是想要害人吗?实在是因为错误地把一时的湿热闭阻当作功效迅速,而不知道不能预料日后复发的真正高明和长远。《大学》重视知识的极致,确实如此!
"Huang" refers to a sallow and puffy complexion; "Dan" refers to the five types of jaundice. The *Jin Gui Yao Lue* (Essential Prescriptions from the Golden Cabinet) originally distinguished between "various Huang" and "various Dan," but the discussion on Dan is detailed while that on Huang is brief, leading readers to easily confuse them. Consequently, they mistakenly assume that all "Huang" corresponds to "Huang Dan" within the five types of Dan. Examining the disease manifestation section on yellow diseases in the *Zhu Bing Yuan Hou Lun* (Source Book of All Categories of Pathogenesis), which spans 146 characters from the name of the yellow disease to its treatment, lists symptoms very meticulously. This must be based on the lost texts of the *Jin Gui Yao Lue*. Why do I say so? Body ache, fever, dry eyes, nasal pain, stiffness in both upper arms and neck, and tightness in the lower back are exterior syndromes of the Taiyang and Yangming channels. In the *Jin Gui Yao Lue*, there is a clause stating: "For patients with jaundice whose pulse is floating, sweating should be induced, and Guizhi Jia Huangqi Tang (Cinnamon Twig plus Astragalus Decoction) is appropriate." The symptoms and treatment correspond perfectly. Dry and difficult defecation indicates a Yangming stomach-fullness excess syndrome. In the *Jin Gui Yao Lue*, there is another clause: "Various types of jaundice are treated with Zhigao Fa Jian (Pork Fat and Human Hair Decoction)." Here too, the symptoms and treatment correspond. Since the *Jin Gui Yao Lue* details the treatments, it should not omit the symptoms; thus, I suspect that Chao Yuanyuan's theory was based on the lost texts of the *Jin Gui Yao Lue*. Furthermore, inferring from this, Huang disease naturally shares therapeutic methods with Shanghan (Cold Damage), hence jaundice often occurs in Shanghan cases. If we consider "Huang Dan" among the five types of Dan, it belongs to miscellaneous diseases like the others, and certainly does not allow for the initial treatment using Shanghan methods as Huang disease does; this is the distinction. Chao Yuanyuan listed "Huang Dan" separately from Huang disease, grouping it with Nü Lao Dan (Jaundice due to Sexual Exhaustion), Jiu Dan (Alcoholic Jaundice), Gu Dan (Grain Jaundice), and Hei Dan (Black Jaundice). He incorporated passages regarding Huang Dan from the *Ling Shu* and *Su Wen*, along with 35 characters from the *Jin Gui Yao Lue* concerning "jaundice accompanied by thirst," into his description of Huang Dan. This differs significantly from the discussion on Huang disease, showing strict differentiation, proving he was indeed a skilled reader of Zhang Zhongjing's works. Later generations mistakenly identified the term "Huang Dan" in the title of the *Jin Gui Yao Lue* as referring specifically to the Huang Dan among the five types, thereby categorizing all mentions of "Huang" in the chapter as such, causing confusion between the treatments for Huang and the five types of Dan. When treatment fails, people claim ancient prescriptions are difficult to use; therefore, one must select the most accurate interpretations when studying classics.
People only know that Huang Dan has Yin and Yang types, but do not understand what Yin and Yang specifically refer to. Upon hearing the word "Yin," they immediately confirm it as a deficiency syndrome without doubt. This applies not only to jaundice but is particularly harmful in the context of jaundice. Jaundice is fundamentally caused by damp-heat; regardless of Yin or Yang type, the correct approach is to treat the damp-heat. If it is truly Yin-type jaundice, the damp-heat has penetrated deeply, indicating a condition more severe than Yang-type jaundice. Administering tonifying agents will trap the damp-heat inside. Although the patient may appear improved temporarily, the root cause of the disease will remain unremoved for life. I have seen many such cases, ultimately irretrievable. Alas! Have people ever considered where the theory of Yin and Yang originates? The *Jin Gui Yao Lue* states: "When jaundice arises from the Yin aspect, the person will vomit; when it arises from the Yang aspect, the person will experience chills followed by fever." Thus, the distinction between these two types of jaundice lies in the depth of the pathology, not in the deficiency or excess of Qi. "Yin" here refers to the Zang organs, specifically the Lung; "Yang" refers to the Six Channels, specifically the Three Yang channels. Zhang Zhongjing's writings contain such examples. For instance, in Shanghan, fever with aversion to cold arises from the Yang, while absence of fever with aversion to cold arises from the Yin; sore throat with facial redness and macules is Yang Du (Yang Toxin), while dark complexion with body pain is Yin Du (Yin Toxin). These are all instances of this principle. Later generations failed to comprehend this meaning. Whenever encountering the term "Yin Syndrome," they either treated it as Cold using Hot herbs or as Deficiency using Tonics. Since the Yuan and Ming dynasties, this has been common. Zhang Jingyue often formulated tonifying prescriptions for Yin-type jaundice. Did he intend to harm people? No, he merely mistook the temporary trapping of damp-heat for rapid efficacy, failing to foresee the true brilliance and foresight required to prevent future relapse. The *Da Xue* (Great Learning) emphasizes the pursuit of ultimate knowledge; this is indeed true.