沈××,女,25岁。痛经十几年,遍用诸药其效不著。嘱其每次月经来潮之前贴宝宝一贴灵,2天换药1次,3个月后,疼痛果止。
麻黄
山西省中医研究所前所长,已故名老中医李翰卿先生说:“诸家都云麻黄辛苦而温,宣肺气,开腠理,透毛窍,散风寒,具有发汗解表之功,是发汗作用最强的药物,若与桂枝相配则发汗的作用更强,虚人用之不慎,可使漏汗不止。,’又说:“《伤寒论》的注释家们论麻黄的作用时,说到它的发汗作用时说得简直比蛇蝎还厉害,所以我长期不肯应用。可是有一年,突遇大量的伤寒证,先用小剂麻黄汤治疗,结果未见l剂发汗,不得已,将麻黄增至18克,结果仍然一例也不见发汗,其后细察药店所售之麻黄皆十数年之陈久者,于是改为从野地现采新鲜之麻黄试之,结果均一剂汗出得愈,始知麻黄新旧药效不同耳。”
大黄
历代医著均云大黄为泻下之剧药,临床用之亦有非如此之效者,细审其因,多与下列因素有关:
1.产地西宁大黄比四川大黄泻下的作用强。2.加工生用泻下作用比炮制的作用强。3.配伍与理气药、泻下药配伍泻下作用强,与利水药配伍泻下作用弱。4.证候实热津伤证的泻下作用弱,阳虚寒湿的泻下作用强。5.用药次数第一次比第三、四次强。所以为了收到泻下作用的效果,其用量常常在1~160克之间浮动。
毒性·功用·体质
在临床的过程中,经常发现有的患者应用某些药物的量极反应。有的患者用量极大则有很好的疗效,有的患者用量极小则有很好的疗效。例如:川乌、草乌、附子,有的患者用至仅用至0.5克却发生了麻木、抽搐、心悸、昏迷。大黄,有的患者用量达200克而不出现腹痛泄泻,而有的患者仅仅应用0.5克却发生严重的腹痛泄泻。熟地,有的患者虽用至250克而无腻膈之害,而有的患者仅仅用至3克却发生了明显的胃脘胀满。白术,有的患者虽用微量即出现便秘,而有的患者虽用大剂而却更加泄泻。红花,有的患者应用0.5克即发生堕胎,而有的患者应用15克后却出现了固胎之效。麻黄,有的患者用量达60克却无汗出,而有的患者虽然仅仅用了0.3克却出现了心悸、汗出不止。如此等等,这是仅仅应用药量的大小。细读前人之中药著作,在论述每个药物时,大都将性味、归经、功效、临证应用放到一起进行论述,而不分列性味、归经、功效、应用,且大都不列用量、不列条目。写功效时必写证候性质,写毒性时亦列体质与候性质。就是说列功效、列毒性时,无不与体质和证候性质相联系,无不把体质、证候性质作为功效大小、毒性大小的指标。所以研究、审查每个药物的功效、毒性时,必须与体质证候性质相联系。
药物功用的两重性
每个药物都有两重性,不过有的比较明显,有的不太明显就是了。例如:大黄既能泻下通便,又能收敛止泻;胡桃肉既能涩肠止泻,缩尿止遗,又能润肠通便,滑窍消石。因此,临床上应用某个药物的某一作用寸,常常采用炮制的方法消除或减低其相反成分,以达到某种用药目的。例如:大黄在临床应用时为了减少其泻下通便作用常常加工成熟军,肉豆蔻为了减少其润便作用常常加工成煨肉豆蔻等。
有些药物的两重性是通过它的性味、归经、功用来体现的。例如:硫黄的润肠通便和补火止泻是通过它的性味酸温,归经人命门、大肠,补火助阳体现出来的;人参、白术的通便和止泻作用是通过它的人参性味甘微苦微温,归经人脾肺,功用补益脾肺,白术性味甘苦温,归经人脾胃,功用补脾益气体现出来的;肉苁蓉的通便和止泻作用是通过它的性味甘咸温,归经人肾大肠,功用补肾壮阳体现出来的。因此,临床应用某个药物进行治疗时,尤应重视它的性味、归经、功用,而不应过多地拘于其能治某某病证,
有些药物的两重性是通过其对某些证候的特性表现出来的。例如:菟丝子诸书很少记载其有通便和止泻的作用,但在应用于肝肾俱虚,阴阳不足的患者身上时,却表现出了很好的润便和止泻作用;山茱萸、五味子诸书均明确列明其有收敛固涩之功,而殊少列有其有利小便之效,而在临床上应用于肾气亏损,小便不利的患者身上却表现出很好的利尿作用;防风、独活,诸书多仅列防风散风解表,胜湿止痛、祛风解痉,独活祛风胜湿止痛,散寒解表,而殊少列其有止泻、通便之效,而在临床上应用于风邪人里的泄泻、便秘时,却表现出了很好的止泻、通便作用。砂仁,诸书均列其有行气止痛、温胃止呕的作用,而殊少提到其有收敛固涩之效,然其用于湿热或寒湿泄泻、遗精、遗尿时,却表现出了很好的收敛固涩作用。栀子、黄连,诸书均云栀子泻火除烦,泄热利湿,黄连清热泻火,清热燥湿,而殊少提到其能致泻、致吐的副作用,而在临床上应用于脾胃虚寒的患者时,却经常出现呕吐、泄泻的副作用。因此临床应用每个药物时必须首先考虑证候的性质。
有些药物的两重性中的某些特性只能通过药物之间的配伍才能体现出来。例如:苏叶本是一个以发表散寒,行气宽中见长的药物,但在与黄连配伍之后,却明显表现出了止吐之效,若与神曲配合,用于食滞不化的呕吐,常常获得意想不到的效果;陈皮与甘草诸书均不列其能通便,而两药配伍常可收到通便之效。如此等等,不胜枚举。
总之,每个药物都有其两重性,所以临床应用每个药物时,一定要注意采用恰当的办法去发挥其有效的功用。
药疹·功用·疗效
遍查清代以前医药学家之著作,未见其有药疹之记载,近查中医药学杂志之报道,云:中药引起过敏反应,特别是药疹者不少。余临床40余年,亦有时见药疹出现者,其疹如粟米晶莹透明者,有如小小出血点者,有如荨麻疹大片大片出现者。
对于这种情况,广大医家有两种不同的见解。一者认为既然中医药著作中没有中药过敏反应之说,那么它一定是最安全的,最无副作用,最无过敏反应的,因此有些医药学家为了炫耀其安全性,常常加上纯中药制剂标样。另一者则认为由于中医过去观察病情不细致,所以脱漏掉了药物过敏反应的记载,近世由于对某些病情进行了认真细致的观察,所以也发现了中药的过敏反应,因此认为那种炫耀纯中药制剂的说法是错误的,不科学的。
以上两家的认识,哪个正确?哪个错误?作为一个科学工作者,必须要有明确的态度。但是怎么明确的表态就是难上加难了。因为药疹这种现象数千年来广大医家肯定是发现过,但他们为什么不记载呢?其中必有深的道理存在。近世为什么记载呢?其中也必有深的道理存在。
1951年秋,治一患者,女,45岁。脘腹经常阵发性剧烈疼痛,月经失凋。经北京、保定诸家医院检查诊为慢性胃炎、慢性盆腔炎。先用西药治疗数年不效,后又用中药治疗数年亦不效、近数日来,突患感冒,头痛,身痛,脘腹疼痛。邀余诊视。察其两脉弦紧而数,舌苔白。综合脉证,诊断为风寒外感。急子人参败毒散一剂,药后3小时,突然发现头痛,身痛,腹痛加剧,继而腹痛、身痛、头痛顿减,而全身却出现了连片连片的荨麻疹样皮疹。患者及家属均惶恐备至,急邀余往诊。一医云:此乃药物过敏所致之药疹也,应急治之,否则则人冥冥之乡矣。吾亦惶恐不知所措。家父诊后云:此如战汗之作,乃病邪由里达表欲除之象也,非药物之过敏反应,勿惧。约1小时许,患者疹退痒止,头痛、身痛、腹痛均失,其后诸证尽失,愈。又如:1965年冬,一男性患者,38岁。脘腹、头身均痛7—8年。遍请中、西医诊治,始终乏效。邀白清佐先生诊治。予药10剂均不效,忽一日头、身、脘、腹疼痛加剧,且烦乱难于忍耐,自述有欲死之状,约一小时许,突然遍身出疹,奇痒难忍。乃急赴某院急诊。云:此药物过敏所致之药疹也,乃中医误治所为耳,应再请中医诊治。余适值班,亦感难于措手足,不得已,再邀白老先生会诊。云:非药疹也。乃药证相符,正气欲驱邪外出之证耳,勿治之,候其气来复可自愈也。然而亦有数次外出始愈者,可再子原方服之,药后果然又疹出遍身,诸证尽失而愈:1993年底,治一人,女,50岁:十几年来,头晕目眩,阵发性加剧,胸满胸痛,气短心烦,心悸。医诊冠状动脉硬化性心脏病、脑动脉硬化、内耳眩晕症。久用西、中药物治疗不效。审其脉濡缓,舌苔白。诊为气阴两虚,痰郁气结。予补气养阴,理气化痰,加减十味温胆汤治之。服药至第4剂时,突感心胸烦乱闷痛甚剧,数小时后,即在全身发现大量的小如针尖大小的皮疹,两天后,才开始逐渐消退,并见诸证大部消失,后果愈。
因阅前人战汗之说,张景岳《景岳全书》云:“战与栗异,战由乎外,栗由乎内也。凡伤寒欲解,将汗之时,若其正气内实,邪不能与之争,但汗出自不作战,所谓不战,应知体不虚也。若其人本虚,邪与正争,微者为振,甚则为战,正胜邪则战而汗解矣。故凡邪正之争于外者则为战,战其愈者也。邪正之争于内者则为栗,栗其甚者也。沦曰:阴中于邪,必内栗也。夫战为正气将复,栗则邪气肆强,故伤寒六七日,有但栗不战,竟成寒逆者,多不可救,此以正气中虚,阴邪内盛,正不胜邪,而反为邪气所胜,凡遇此证,使非用大补温热之剂,及艾灼回阳等法,其他焉得而御之。”清·戴天章《瘟疫明辨》云:“时疫不论初起传变未否,俱以战汗为佳兆。以战则邪正相争,汗则正逐邪出,然有透与不透之分,凡透者,汗必淋漓,汗后身凉,口不渴,舌苔净,二便清,胸腹胁无阻滞结痛,始为全解之战汗,否则余邪未净而复热,则有再作战汗而解者,有战汗须三四次而后解者,有战汗一次不能再战,待屡下而退者,有不能再作战汗,再加沉困而死者!总视其本气之强弱何如耳。”药物过敏,前人所以不予记载者,亦如是之理耳。若正气内实者,但药后病除也,若其人本虚,药后邪与正争,微者全身不适,甚者则遍身出疹,正胜邪则诸证获愈。总之,药疹得出者为正气将复,而非有害矣。若正气中虚,阴邪内盛,正不胜邪,反为邪气所胜者,则有疹后厥逆,甚有呜呼者,亦不可不注意耳。
危重疾病必须诊腹
脘腹是脾胃所居之所。脾胃为后天之本,居中焦,通连上下,是升降运动的枢纽,肝的升发,肺的肃降,心火的下降,肾水的上升,肺的出气,肾的纳气,无不是在脾胃升降运动的协助下才完成的,所以李东垣说:“脾胃虚则九窍不通”,“胃虚则俱病”:因此除腹部疾病和伤寒、温病应重视腹诊外,危重疾病的诊断治疗也应重视诊腹部的虚实及其虚实所在的部位。
例如:厥脱证中的休克病,如果不按其脘腹常常很难分辨其虚或实证。曾治患者段××,男,50岁。冠状动脉硬化性心脏病,心绞痛3年多。昨夜9时许,腹部又突感不适,泄泻两次,急服黄连素2片,2小时后,不但诸证不见改善,而且更加严重。急送医院治疗。察其大便如黑色墨汁状,神志呈朦胧状态,四肢、耳壳、前额均厥冷如冰。血压50/30mmHg,大便潜血++++。急予西药治疗,至今日下午4时左右,诸证不见改善,又加用中药三七、云南白药配合治疗,至6时左右仍不见改善。急邀余诊:察其神志不清,前额、下颏,耳壳均冷,足冷至膝,手冷至肘,舌苔薄黄,舌质淡黯,脉沉微欲绝?按其腹从剑突下至少腹均柔软。综合脉证,思之:此乃阳气大衰欲绝之证,夹有郁热之故?拟急温心脾肾阳,佐以泻火:处方:人参10克,附子10克,白术10克,干姜10克,甘草10克,黄连10克,肉桂9克?
次日下午往诊,神志清,二便正常,四肢温,血压100/70mmHg。又连服2剂,愈。
又如患者和××,女,36岁。异位妊娠,肠梗阻,休克。前用输血、独参汤剂治疗,诸证不见改善。急邀会诊。察其除肢厥,前额、耳壳,下颏厥冷如冰,神志不清,脉微欲绝外,并见其腹满大,胃脘部有明显的抵抗感及压痛。综合脉证,诊其为元气大衰,腑实夹瘀血证。乃拟人参大补元气,枳实、厚朴破气行滞,桃仁活血,二丑通下。次日即神志转清,血压由40/20mmHg升至100/78mmHg。
关格证中的肠梗阻,近世医家宗六腑以通为顺意,力主通下之法以治肠梗阻,但临床用之多有不效,细思其因未辨虚实寒热耳。而虚实寒热之辨尤应诊腹。曾治患者耿××,男,78岁。患小肠疝气数十年,过去每次发病一用手托即很快好转。但两天前,因为走路较多,又突然腹痛不止,大便不行,呕吐不止。医始以手法上托不效,继又以复方大承气汤、黑豆油灌肠治疗仍不效。察其神志不清,手足厥冷,腹部胀大,但按之尚濡软,呕吐呃逆,饮食物不断由口角流出,舌苔白,脉虚数。综合脉证,思之:腹胀大而按之柔软者,虚而夹气滞也。冶宜拟温中健脾,理气消胀。处方:厚朴24克,人参10克,干姜12克,生姜10克,炙草10克。
服药1剂,矢气甚多,大便得行,腹胀大减,继服1剂,诸证消失,愈。
沈××,女,25岁。痛经(行经腹痛)十几年,遍用诸药其效不著。嘱其每次月经来潮之前贴宝宝一贴灵,2天换药1次,3个月后,疼痛果止。
麻黄
山西省中医研究所前所长,已故名老中医李翰卿先生说:“诸家都云麻黄辛苦而温,宣肺气,开腠理,透毛窍,散风寒,具有发汗解表之功,是发汗作用最强的药物,若与桂枝相配则发汗的作用更强,虚人用之不慎,可使漏汗不止。,’又说:‘《伤寒论》的注释家们论麻黄的作用时,说到它的发汗作用时说得简直比蛇蝎还厉害,所以我长期不肯应用。可是有一年,突遇大量的伤寒证,先用小剂麻黄汤治疗,结果未见l剂发汗,不得已,将麻黄增至18克,结果仍然一例也不见发汗,其后细察药店所售之麻黄皆十数年之陈久者,于是改为从野地现采新鲜之麻黄试之,结果均一剂汗出得愈,始知麻黄新旧药效不同耳。”
大黄
历代医著均云大黄为泻下之剧药,临床用之亦有非如此之效者,细审其因,多与下列因素有关:
1.产地西宁大黄比四川大黄泻下的作用强。2.加工生用泻下作用比炮制的作用强。3.配伍与理气药、泻下药配伍泻下作用强,与利水药配伍泻下作用弱。4.证候实热津伤证的泻下作用弱,阳虚寒湿的泻下作用强。5.用药次数第一次比第三、四次强。所以为了收到泻下作用的效果,其用量常常在1~160克之间浮动。
毒性·功用·体质
在临床的过程中,经常发现有的患者应用某些药物的量极反应。有的患者用量极大则有很好的疗效,有的患者用量极小则有很好的疗效。例如:川乌、草乌、附子,有的患者用至仅用至0.5克却发生了麻木、抽搐、心悸、昏迷。大黄,有的患者用量达200克而不出现腹痛泄泻,而有的患者仅仅应用0.5克却发生严重的腹痛泄泻。熟地,有的患者虽用至250克而无腻膈之害,而有的患者仅仅用至3克却发生了明显的胃脘胀满。白术,有的患者虽用微量即出现便秘,而有的患者虽用大剂而却更加泄泻。红花,有的患者应用0.5克即发生堕胎,而有的患者应用15克后却出现了固胎之效。麻黄,有的患者用量达60克却无汗出,而有的患者虽然仅仅用了0.3克却出现了心悸、汗出不止。如此等等,这是仅仅应用药量的大小。细读前人之中药著作,在论述每个药物时,大都将性味、归经、功效、临证应用放到一起进行论述,而不分列性味、归经、功效、应用,且大都不列用量、不列条目。写功效时必写证候性质,写毒性时亦列体质与候性质。就是说列功效、列毒性时,无不与体质和证候性质相联系,无不把体质、证候性质作为功效大小、毒性大小的指标。所以研究、审查每个药物的功效、毒性时,必须与体质证候性质相联系。
药物功用的两重性
每个药物都有两重性,不过有的比较明显,有的不太明显就是了。例如:大黄既能泻下通便,又能收敛止泻;胡桃肉既能涩肠止泻,缩尿止遗,又能润肠通便,滑窍消石。因此,临床上应用某个药物的某一作用寸,常常采用炮制的方法消除或减低其相反成分,以达到某种用药目的。例如:大黄在临床应用时为了减少其泻下通便作用常常加工成熟军,肉豆蔻为了减少其润便作用常常加工成煨肉豆蔻等。
有些药物的两重性是通过它的性味、归经、功用来体现的。例如:硫黄的润肠通便和补火止泻是通过它的性味酸温,归经人命门、大肠,补火助阳体现出来的;人参、白术的通便和止泻作用是通过它的人参性味甘微苦微温,归经人脾肺,功用补益脾肺,白术性味甘苦温,归经人脾胃,功用补脾益气体现出来的;肉苁蓉的通便和止泻作用是通过它的性味甘咸温,归经人肾大肠,功用补肾壮阳体现出来的。因此,临床应用某个药物进行治疗时,尤应重视它的性味、归经、功用,而不应过多地拘于其能治某某病证,
有些药物的两重性是通过其对某些证候的特性表现出来的。例如:菟丝子诸书很少记载其有通便和止泻的作用,但在应用于肝肾俱虚,阴阳不足的患者身上时,却表现出了很好的润便和止泻作用;山茱萸、五味子诸书均明确列明其有收敛固涩之功,而殊少列有其有利小便之效,而在临床上应用于肾气亏损,小便不利的患者身上却表现出很好的利尿作用;防风、独活,诸书多仅列防风散风解表,胜湿止痛、祛风解痉,独活祛风胜湿止痛,散寒解表,而殊少列其有止泻、通便之效,而在临床上应用于风邪人里的泄泻、便秘时,却表现出了很好的止泻、通便作用。砂仁,诸书均列其有行气止痛、温胃止呕的作用,而殊少提到其有收敛固涩之效,然其用于湿热或寒湿泄泻、遗精、遗尿时,却表现出了很好的收敛固涩作用。栀子、黄连,诸书均云栀子泻火除烦,泄热利湿,黄连清热泻火,清热燥湿,而殊少提到其能致泻、致吐的副作用,而在临床上应用于脾胃虚寒的患者时,却经常出现呕吐、泄泻的副作用。因此临床应用每个药物时必须首先考虑证候的性质。
有些药物的两重性中的某些特性只能通过药物之间的配伍才能体现出来。例如:苏叶本是一个以发表散寒,行气宽中见长的药物,但在与黄连配伍之后,却明显表现出了止吐之效,若与神曲配合,用于食滞不化的呕吐,常常获得意想不到的效果;陈皮与甘草诸书均不列其能通便,而两药配伍常可收到通便之效。如此等等,不胜枚举。
总之,每个药物都有其两重性,所以临床应用每个药物时,一定要注意采用恰当的办法去发挥其有效的功用。
药疹·功用·疗效
遍查清代以前医药学家之著作,未见其有药疹之记载,近查中医药学杂志之报道,云:中药引起过敏反应,特别是药疹者不少。余临床40余年,亦有时见药疹出现者,其疹如粟米晶莹透明者,有如小小出血点者,有如荨麻疹大片大片出现者。
对于这种情况,广大医家有两种不同的见解。一者认为既然中医药著作中没有中药过敏反应之说,那么它一定是最安全的,最无副作用,最无过敏反应的,因此有些医药学家为了炫耀其安全性,常常加上纯中药制剂标样。另一者则认为由于中医过去观察病情不细致,所以脱漏掉了药物过敏反应的记载,近世由于对某些病情进行了认真细致的观察,所以也发现了中药的过敏反应,因此认为那种炫耀纯中药制剂的说法是错误的,不科学的。
以上两家的认识,哪个正确?哪个错误?作为一个科学工作者,必须要有明确的态度。但是怎么明确的表态就是难上加难了。因为药疹这种现象数千年来广大医家肯定是发现过,但他们为什么不记载呢?其中必有深的道理存在。近世为什么记载呢?其中也必有深的道理存在。
1951年秋,治一患者,女,45岁。脘腹经常阵发性剧烈疼痛,月经失凋。经北京、保定诸家医院检查诊为慢性胃炎、慢性盆腔炎。先用西药治疗数年不效,后又用中药治疗数年亦不效、近数日来,突患感冒,头痛,身痛,脘腹疼痛。邀余诊视。察其两脉弦紧而数,舌苔白。综合脉证,诊断为风寒外感。急子人参败毒散一剂,药后3小时,突然发现头痛,身痛,腹痛加剧,继而腹痛、身痛、头痛顿减,而全身却出现了连片连片的荨麻疹样皮疹。患者及家属均惶恐备至,急邀余往诊。一医云:此乃药物过敏所致之药疹也,应急治之,否则则人冥冥之乡矣。吾亦惶恐不知所措。家父诊后云:此如战汗之作,乃病邪由里达表欲除之象也,非药物之过敏反应,勿惧。约1小时许,患者疹退痒止,头痛、身痛、腹痛均失,其后诸证尽失,愈。又如:1965年冬,一男性患者,38岁。脘腹、头身均痛7—8年。遍请中、西医诊治,始终乏效。邀白清佐先生诊治。予药10剂均不效,忽一日头、身、脘、腹疼痛加剧,且烦乱难于忍耐,自述有欲死之状,约一小时许,突然遍身出疹,奇痒难忍。乃急赴某院急诊。云:此药物过敏所致之药疹也,乃中医误治所为耳,应再请中医诊治。余适值班,亦感难于措手足,不得已,再邀白老先生会诊。云:非药疹也。乃药证相符,正气欲驱邪外出之证耳,勿治之,候其气来复可自愈也。然而亦有数次外出始愈者,可再子原方服之,药后果然又疹出遍身,诸证尽失而愈:1993年底,治一人,女,50岁:十几年来,头晕目眩,阵发性加剧,胸满胸痛,气短心烦,心悸。医诊冠状动脉硬化性心脏病、脑动脉硬化、内耳眩晕症。久用西、中药物治疗不效。审其脉濡缓,舌苔白。诊为气阴两虚,痰郁气结。予补气养阴,理气化痰,加减十味温胆汤治之。服药至第4剂时,突感心胸烦乱闷痛甚剧,数小时后,即在全身发现大量的小如针尖大小的皮疹,两天后,才开始逐渐消退,并见诸证大部消失,后果愈。
因阅前人战汗之说,张景岳《景岳全书》云:“战与栗异,战由乎外,栗由乎内也。凡伤寒欲解,将汗之时,若其正气内实,邪不能与之争,但汗出自不作战,所谓不战,应知体不虚也。若其人本虚,邪与正争,微者为振,甚则为战,正胜邪则战而汗解矣。故凡邪正之争于外者则为战,战其愈者也。邪正之争于内者则为栗,栗其甚者也。沦曰:阴中于邪,必内栗也。夫战为正气将复,栗则邪气肆强,故伤寒六七日,有但栗不战,竟成寒逆者,多不可救,此以正气中虚,阴邪内盛,正不胜邪,而反为邪气所胜,凡遇此证,使非用大补温热之剂,及艾灼回阳等法,其他焉得而御之。”清·戴天章《瘟疫明辨》云:“时疫不论初起传变未否,俱以战汗为佳兆。以战则邪正相争,汗则正逐邪出,然有透与不透之分,凡透者,汗必淋漓,汗后身凉,口不渴,舌苔净,二便清,胸腹胁无阻滞结痛,始为全解之战汗,否则余邪未净而复热,则有再作战汗而解者,有战汗须三四次而后解者,有战汗一次不能再战,待屡下而退者,有不能再作战汗,再加沉困而死者!总视其本气之强弱何如耳。”药物过敏,前人所以不予记载者,亦如是之理耳。若正气内实者,但药后病除也,若其人本虚,药后邪与正争,微者全身不适,甚者则遍身出疹,正胜邪则诸证获愈。总之,药疹得出者为正气将复,而非有害矣。若正气中虚,阴邪内盛,正不胜邪,反为邪气所胜者,则有疹后厥逆,甚有呜呼者,亦不可不注意耳。
危重疾病必须诊腹
脘腹是脾胃所居之所。脾胃为后天之本,居中焦,通连上下,是升降运动的枢纽,肝的升发,肺的肃降,心火的下降,肾水的上升,肺的出气,肾的纳气,无不是在脾胃升降运动的协助下才完成的,所以李东垣说:“脾胃虚则九窍不通”,“胃虚则俱病”:因此除腹部疾病和伤寒、温病应重视腹诊外,危重疾病的诊断治疗也应重视诊腹部的虚实及其虚实所在的部位。
例如:厥脱证中的休克病,如果不按其脘腹常常很难分辨其虚或实证。曾治患者段××,男,50岁。冠状动脉硬化性心脏病,心绞痛3年多。昨夜9时许,腹部又突感不适,泄泻两次,急服黄连素2片,2小时后,不但诸证不见改善,而且更加严重。急送医院治疗。察其大便如黑色墨汁状,神志呈朦胧状态,四肢、耳壳、前额均厥冷如冰。血压50/30mmHg,大便潜血++++。急予西药治疗,至今日下午4时左右,诸证不见改善,又加用中药三七、云南白药配合治疗,至6时左右仍不见改善。急邀余诊:察其神志不清,前额、下颏,耳壳均冷,足冷至膝,手冷至肘,舌苔薄黄,舌质淡黯,脉沉微欲绝?按其腹从剑突下至少腹均柔软。综合脉证,思之:此乃阳气大衰欲绝之证,夹有郁热之故?拟急温心脾肾阳,佐以泻火:处方:人参10克,附子10克,白术10克,干姜10克,甘草10克,黄连10克,肉桂9克?
次日下午往诊,神志清,二便正常,四肢温,血压100/70mmHg。又连服2剂,愈。
又如患者和××,女,36岁。异位妊娠,肠梗阻,休克。前用输血、独参汤剂治疗,诸证不见改善。急邀会诊。察其除肢厥,前额、耳壳,下颏厥冷如冰,神志不清,脉微欲绝外,并见其腹满大,胃脘部有明显的抵抗感及压痛。综合脉证,诊其为元气大衰,腑实夹瘀血证。乃拟人参大补元气,枳实、厚朴破气行滞,桃仁活血,二丑通下。次日即神志转清,血压由40/20mmHg升至100/78mmHg。
关格证中的肠梗阻,近世医家宗六腑以通为顺意,力主通下之法以治肠梗阻,但临床用之多有不效,细思其因未辨虚实寒热耳。而虚实寒热之辨尤应诊腹。曾治患者耿××,男,78岁。患小肠疝气数十年,过去每次发病一用手托即很快好转。但两天前,因为走路较多,又突然腹痛不止,大便不行,呕吐不止。医始以手法上托不效,继又以复方大承气汤、黑豆油灌肠治疗仍不效。察其神志不清,手足厥冷,腹部胀大,但按之尚濡软,呕吐呃逆,饮食物不断由口角流出,舌苔白,脉虚数。综合脉证,思之:腹胀大而按之柔软者,虚而夹气滞也。冶宜拟温中健脾,理气消胀。处方:厚朴24克,人参10克,干姜12克,生姜10克,炙草10克。
服药1剂,矢气甚多,大便得行,腹胀大减,继服1剂,诸证消失,愈。
Shen XX, female, 25 years old. Suffered from dysmenorrhea (painful menstruation) for over ten years; various medications yielded little effect. Instructed to apply "Baobao Yitianling" (Baby One Patch Spirit) before each menstrual onset, changing the patch every two days. After three months, the pain ceased as expected.
Ephedrae Herba (Mahuang, 麻黄)
Mr. Li Hanqing, former director of the Shanxi Provincial Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine and a renowned late senior TCM practitioner, stated: "All schools claim that Mahuang is pungent, bitter, and warm, promoting Lung Qi, opening the interstices (Couli), penetrating hair follicles, dispersing wind-cold, and possessing the function of inducing sweating to release the exterior. It is the herb with the strongest sweating action. If combined with Cinnamon Twig (Guizhi), its sweating effect is even stronger. If used carelessly by deficient individuals, it may cause unceasing leakage of sweat." He further said: "Commentators on the *Treatise on Cold Damage* (*Shanghan Lun*) describe its sweating action as more terrifying than snakes and scorpions, which is why I was reluctant to use it for a long time. However, one year, when encountering a large number of cold damage cases, I initially treated them with small doses of Ephedra Decoction (Mahuang Tang). Not a single case sweated after one dose. Reluctantly, I increased the dosage of Mahuang to 18 grams, yet still no patient sweated. Later, upon careful inspection, I found that the Mahuang sold in pharmacies had been stored for over ten years. I then switched to fresh Mahuang collected from the wild. The result was that all patients recovered after one dose, revealing that the efficacy of Mahuang differs between new and old herbs."
Rhei Radix et Rhizoma (Dahuang, 大黄)
Historical medical texts consistently describe Dahuang as a potent purgative. However, clinical effects vary. Upon detailed examination, this is often related to the following factors:
1. Origin: Xining Dahuang has a stronger purgative effect than Sichuan Dahuang.
2. Processing: Raw usage has a stronger purgative effect than processed usage.
3. Compatibility: Combined with Qi-regulating or purgative herbs, the purgative effect is strong; combined with diuretic herbs, it is weak.
4. Syndrome: The purgative effect is weak in syndromes of excess heat damaging fluids, but strong in syndromes of Yang deficiency with cold-dampness.
5. Frequency of use: The first dose has a stronger effect than the third or fourth doses. Therefore, to achieve a purgative effect, the dosage often fluctuates between 1 and 160 grams.
Toxicity · Efficacy · Constitution
In clinical practice, it is frequently observed that patients exhibit extreme variability in their response to certain drugs based on dosage. Some patients require very high doses for good efficacy, while others achieve good results with very low doses. For example: with Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata (Chuanwu, Chuanwu), Aconiti Kusnezoffii Radix (Caowu, Caowu), and Aconiti Radix (Fuzi, Fuzi), some patients experienced numbness, convulsions, palpitations, and coma at doses as low as 0.5 grams. With Dahuang, some patients tolerated doses up to 200 grams without abdominal pain or diarrhea, while others developed severe abdominal pain and diarrhea at just 0.5 grams. With Rehmanniae Radix Praeparata (Shudi, Shudi), some patients tolerated 250 grams without stomachal oppression, while others developed obvious epigastric distension at only 3 grams. With Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma (Baizhu, Baizhu), some patients experienced constipation with trace amounts, while others suffered worsened diarrhea with large doses. With Carthami Flos (Honghua, Honghua), some patients miscarried at 0.5 grams, while others achieved fetal stabilization at 15 grams. With Mahuang, some patients did not sweat even at 60 grams, while others experienced palpitations and unceasing sweating at only 0.3 grams. And so on. This highlights the significance of dosage size.
Reading ancient materia medica works carefully, authors typically discuss flavor, meridian tropism, efficacy, and clinical application together, rather than listing them separately, and rarely specify dosages or itemize entries. When describing efficacy, they necessarily mention syndrome nature; when describing toxicity, they list constitution and syndrome nature. That is, when listing efficacy or toxicity, there is no connection to constitution and syndrome nature, nor is there any indication of the magnitude of efficacy or toxicity based on these factors. Therefore, when studying and reviewing the efficacy and toxicity of each drug, it must be linked to constitution and syndrome nature.
The Dual Nature of Drug Functions
Every drug possesses a dual nature, though some are more obvious than others. For example: Dahuang can both purge bowels to relieve constipation and astringe to stop diarrhea; Juglandis Semen (Hetaoren, Hetaoren) can both bind the intestines to stop diarrhea and reduce urination/incontinence, and also moisten the intestines to relieve constipation and dissolve stones. Therefore, clinically, when applying a specific function of a drug, processing methods are often used to eliminate or reduce opposing components to achieve a specific therapeutic goal. For example: Dahuang is often processed into Prepared Dahuang (Shujun, Shujun) to reduce its purgative effect; Myristicae Semen (Roudoukou, Roudoukou) is often roasted (Wei Roudoukou, Wei Roudoukou) to reduce its lubricating effect.
The dual nature of some drugs is manifested through their flavor, meridian tropism, and functions. For example: the bowel-moistening and fire-supplementing anti-diarrheal effects of Realgar (Liuhuang, Liuhuang) are reflected by its sour and warm flavor, entry into the Gate of Life (Mingmen, Mingmen) and Large Intestine meridians, and its function of supplementing fire and assisting Yang; the bowel-relieving and anti-diarrheal effects of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma (Renshen, Renshen) and Baizhu are reflected by Renshen’s sweet, slightly bitter, and slightly warm flavor, entry into the Spleen and Lung meridians, and its function of tonifying Spleen and Lung, and Baizhu’s sweet, bitter, and warm flavor, entry into the Spleen and Stomach meridians, and its function of tonifying Spleen and boosting Qi; the bowel-relieving and anti-diarrheal effects of Cistanche Deserticola (Roucongrong, Roucongrong) are reflected by its sweet, salty, and warm flavor, entry into the Kidney and Large Intestine meridians, and its function of tonifying Kidney and strengthening Yang. Therefore, when clinically applying a drug for treatment, one should particularly value its flavor, meridian tropism, and function, rather than being overly constrained by its ability to treat specific diseases.
The dual nature of some drugs is manifested through their characteristics regarding certain syndromes. For example: Cuscutae Semen (Tusizi, Tusizi) is rarely recorded in books as having bowel-relieving or anti-diarrheal effects, but when applied to patients with simultaneous Liver and Kidney deficiency and Yin-Yang insufficiency, it exhibits excellent bowel-moistening and anti-diarrheal effects; Cornus Officinalis Fruit (Shanzhuyu, Shanzhuyu) and Schisandrae Fructus (Wuweizi, Wuweizi) are clearly listed in books as having astringent and consolidating properties, but rarely listed as promoting urination; however, when clinically applied to patients with Kidney Qi deficiency and difficult urination, they exhibit good diuretic effects; Saposhnikoviae Radix (Fangfeng, Fangfeng) and Angelica Pubescentis Root (Duohuo, Duohuo) are mostly listed in books as dispelling wind and releasing the exterior, overcoming dampness and relieving pain, expelling wind and relieving spasms (for Fangfeng); and dispelling wind, overcoming dampness, relieving pain, and releasing the exterior from cold (for Duohuo), but rarely listed as having anti-diarrheal or bowel-relieving effects; however, when clinically applied to diarrhea and constipation caused by wind pathogen entering the interior, they exhibit excellent anti-diarrheal and bowel-relieving effects. Amomi Fructus Rotundus (Sharen, Sharen) is listed in books as regulating Qi and relieving pain, warming the Stomach and stopping vomiting, but rarely mentioned as having astringent and consolidating effects; however, when used for damp-heat or cold-damp diarrhea, spermatorrhea, or enuresis, it exhibits excellent astringent and consolidating effects. Gardeniae Fructus (Zhizi, Zhizi) and Coptidis Rhizoma (Huanglian, Huanglian) are described in books as clearing fire and relieving irritability, draining heat and promoting dampness (for Zhizi); and clearing heat, draining fire, clearing heat, and drying dampness (for Huanglian), but rarely mentioned as causing diarrhea or vomiting as side effects; however, when clinically applied to patients with Spleen-Stomach deficiency-cold, vomiting and diarrhea side effects often occur. Therefore, when clinically applying each drug, the nature of the syndrome must be considered first.
Certain characteristics of the dual nature of some drugs can only be manifested through compatibility between drugs. For example: Perillae Folium (Zisuye, Zisuye) is primarily known for releasing the exterior and dispersing cold, regulating Qi and expanding the middle; but when combined with Huanglian, it clearly exhibits anti-emetic effects. If combined with Medicated Leaven (Shenqu, Shenqu) for vomiting due to food stagnation, it often yields unexpected results. Tangerine Peel (Chenpi, Chenpi) and Licorice Root (Gancao, Gancao) are not listed in books as capable of relieving constipation, but their combination often achieves this effect. And so on, too numerous to enumerate.
In summary, every drug has a dual nature. Therefore, when clinically applying each drug, one must pay attention to using appropriate methods to bring out its effective functions.
Drug Rash · Function · Efficacy
Searching through works of pharmaceutical experts before the Qing Dynasty, no records of drug rash were found. Recent searches of TCM journals report that allergic reactions to Chinese herbal medicines, especially drug rashes, are quite common. In my 40+ years of clinical practice, I have occasionally seen drug rashes appear. These rashes resemble translucent millet grains, look like small hemorrhagic spots, or appear as large patches of urticaria.
Regarding this situation, there are two different views among practitioners. One view holds that since TCM literature lacks mentions of herbal allergies, it must be the safest, with no side effects or allergic reactions. Therefore, some pharmaceutical experts, to boast about safety, often label products as "pure herbal preparations." The other view argues that because past TCM observations of conditions were not meticulous, records of drug allergies were omitted. Recently, due to careful observation of certain conditions, herbal allergies have been discovered. Thus, they believe the boasting about pure herbal preparations is wrong and unscientific.
Which of these two views is correct? Which is wrong? As a scientific worker, one must have a clear attitude. However, making such a clear statement is extremely difficult. Because the phenomenon of drug rash was certainly discovered by practitioners over thousands of years, why did they not record it? There must be deep reasons. Why is it recorded recently? There must also be deep reasons.
In Autumn 1951, I treated a patient, female, 45 years old. She suffered from frequent paroxysmal severe abdominal pain and irregular menstruation. Checked at various hospitals in Beijing and Baoding, diagnosed with chronic gastritis and chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Western medicine treatment for several years was ineffective. TCM treatment for several years was also ineffective. Recently, she suddenly caught a cold, with headache, body ache, and abdominal pain. Invited me to consult. Her pulses were wiry, tight, and rapid; tongue coating was white. Synthesizing pulse and symptoms, diagnosed as Wind-Cold exterior contraction. Urgently prescribed one dose of Ginseng and Imperata Decoction (Renshen Baidu San, Renshen Baidu San). Three hours after taking the medicine, she suddenly found her headache, body ache, and abdominal pain intensified. Then, abruptly, the abdominal, body, and head pains decreased significantly, but widespread urticaria-like rashes appeared all over her body. The patient and family were terrified and urgently invited me back. One doctor said: "This is a drug rash caused by drug allergy. It must be treated urgently, otherwise she will enter the realm of darkness." I was also panicked and didn't know what to do. My father examined her and said: "This is like the onset of Battle Sweat (Zhanhan, Zhanhan). It is a sign that pathogens are moving from the interior to the exterior to be expelled. It is not an allergic reaction. Do not fear." About an hour later, the patient's rash receded, itching stopped, and headache, body ache, and abdominal pain disappeared. Subsequently, all symptoms vanished, and she recovered.
Another example: Winter 1965, a male patient, 38 years old. Abdominal and head/body pain for 7-8 years. Consulted many TCM and Western doctors, always ineffective. Invited Mr. Bai Qingzuo to treat. Prescribed 10 doses, all ineffective. Suddenly one day, head, body, abdominal, and stomach pains intensified, accompanied by unbearable restlessness, feeling like wanting to die. After about an hour, sudden widespread rash appeared, with unbearable itching. Urgently went to a hospital emergency room. They said: "This is a drug rash caused by drug allergy, due to misdiagnosis/treatment by TCM. Should invite another TCM doctor." I happened to be on duty, also felt helpless, and reluctantly invited Mr. Bai again for consultation. He said: "It is not a drug rash. It is a case where the medicine matches the syndrome, and the Healthy Qi (Zhengqi, Zhengqi) wants to drive the pathogen out. Do not treat it. Wait for the Qi to recover, and it will heal itself." However, some cases required multiple episodes of rash expulsion before healing. He suggested continuing the original prescription. After taking the medicine, indeed, rash appeared all over the body again, all symptoms vanished, and she recovered.
End of 1993, treated a person, female, 50 years old. For over ten years, dizziness and vertigo, paroxysmally worsening, chest fullness and pain, shortness of breath, irritability, palpitations. Diagnosed with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, cerebral arteriosclerosis, and Meniere's disease. Long-term Western and TCM treatment was ineffective. Pulse was soggy and slow; tongue coating was white. Diagnosed as Qi and Yin deficiency, Phlegm stagnation and Qi knotting. Prescribed tonifying Qi and nourishing Yin, regulating Qi and resolving Phlegm, Modified Ten-Ingredient Warm Gallbladder Decoction (Jiajian Shiwei Wendan Tang, Jiajian Shiwei Wendan Tang). On the 4th dose, suddenly felt severe mental agitation and stifling chest pain. Several hours later, numerous needle-point-sized rashes appeared all over the body. Two days later, they gradually subsided, and most symptoms disappeared. Eventually, she recovered.
Reviewing the ancients' theory of Battle Sweat (Zhanhan, Zhanhan), Zhang Jingyue in *Complete Works of Jingyue* (*Jingyue Quanshu*, Jingyue Quanshu) said: "Battle (Zhan, Zhan) and trembling (Li, Li) are different. Battle comes from the exterior, trembling from the interior. Whenever Cold Damage is about to resolve and sweat is imminent, if the Healthy Qi is internally solid, the pathogen cannot contend with it, and sweat appears naturally without battle. Knowing there is no battle means the constitution is not deficient. If the person is originally deficient, the pathogen contends with the Healthy Qi. Mildly it is trembling (Zhen, Zhen), severely it is battle (Zhan, Zhan). If Healthy Qi defeats the pathogen, battle occurs followed by sweating and resolution. Thus, contention between pathogen and Healthy Qi on the exterior is battle, which leads to recovery. Contention on the interior is trembling, which is more severe. Lunzi said: 'When Yin is attacked by pathogen, internal trembling must occur.' Battle indicates Healthy Qi is about to recover; trembling indicates Pathogenic Qi is rampant. Therefore, in Cold Damage, on the 6th or 7th day, if there is only trembling without battle, eventually becoming cold reversal, it is mostly incurable. This is because Healthy Qi is centrally deficient, Yin pathogen is internally excessive, Healthy Qi cannot defeat the pathogen, and is instead defeated by it. In such cases, unless using large doses of great tonifying and warming agents, and moxibustion to restore Yang, how else can it be defended against?" Qing Dynasty Dai Tianzhang in *Differentiation of Plague* (*Wenyi Mingbian*, Wenyi Mingbian) said: "For seasonal epidemics, regardless of initial onset or transmission, Battle Sweat is a good omen. Battle means pathogen and Healthy Qi contend; sweating means Healthy Qi drives the pathogen out. However, there is distinction between thorough and unthorough resolution. Those who resolve thoroughly sweat profusely; after sweating, the body cools, mouth is not thirsty, tongue coating clears, urination and defecation are clear, chest/abdomen/flanks have no obstruction or knotted pain. Only then is it complete resolution via Battle Sweat. Otherwise, residual pathogen remains and fever returns. There are those who need to battle-sweat two or three times to resolve, those who battle-sweat once and cannot battle again, waiting for repeated purging to retreat, and those who cannot battle-sweat again, adding sinking fatigue and death! It all depends on the strength of the Root Qi." The reason predecessors did not record drug allergies is similar to this principle. If Healthy Qi is internally solid, the disease is cured after medication. If the person is originally deficient, after medication, pathogen contends with Healthy Qi. Mildly, general discomfort; severely, widespread rash. If Healthy Qi defeats the pathogen, all symptoms are resolved. In summary, the emergence of drug rash indicates Healthy Qi is about to recover, and is not harmful. If Healthy Qi is centrally deficient, Yin pathogen is internally excessive, Healthy Qi cannot defeat the pathogen, and is instead defeated by it, there may be post-rash cold reversal, or even death. This also requires attention.
Abdominal Palpation is Essential for Critical Diseases
The Epigastrium and Abdomen are the dwelling places of the Spleen and Stomach. The Spleen and Stomach are the Foundation of Post-Heaven, located in the Middle Jiao, connecting above and below, serving as the pivot of ascending and descending movements. The ascending of Liver Qi, descending of Lung Qi, descent of Heart Fire, ascent of Kidney Water, exhalation of Lung Qi, and inhalation of Kidney Qi are all completed with the assistance of the ascending and descending movements of the Spleen and Stomach. Therefore, Li Dongyuan said: "If Spleen and Stomach are deficient, the Nine Orifices are blocked," and "If Stomach is deficient, all organs become diseased." Therefore, besides abdominal diseases and Cold Damage/Warm Diseases requiring emphasis on abdominal palpation, the diagnosis and treatment of critical diseases should also emphasize palpating the Deficiency/Excess nature of the abdomen and the location of this Deficiency/Excess.
For example: In Shock within the Syndrome of Jue-Tuo (Cold Extremities and Collapse), if the epigastrium and abdomen are not palpated, it is often difficult to distinguish between Deficiency and Excess syndromes. I once treated patient Duan XX, male, 50 years old. Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, angina pectoris for over 3 years. Around 9 PM last night, sudden abdominal discomfort, two episodes of diarrhea. Urgently took 2 tablets of Berberine. Two hours later, not only did symptoms not improve, but they worsened. Urgently sent to hospital. Observed black tarry stools, consciousness in a hazy state, extremities, ear shells, and forehead cold as ice. Blood pressure 50/30 mmHg, fecal occult blood +++. Urgently gave Western medicine treatment. By 4 PM that day, symptoms still did not improve. Added Chinese herbs Sanqi (Notoginseng Radix et Rhizoma, Sanqi) and Yunnan Baiyao (Yunnan Baiyao, Yunnan Baiyao) for combined treatment. By 6 PM, still no improvement. Urgently invited me to consult. Observed unclear consciousness, cold forehead, chin, and ear shells, feet cold to knees, hands cold to elbows, thin yellow tongue coating, pale-dark tongue body, pulse deep, minute, and nearly imperceptible. Palpated abdomen from xiphoid process to lower abdomen, all soft. Synthesizing pulse and symptoms, pondered: This is a syndrome of severe decline of Yang Qi nearing exhaustion, complicated by stagnant heat? Planned to urgently warm Heart, Spleen, and Kidney Yang, assisted by draining fire. Prescription: Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma (Renshen, Renshen) 10g, Aconiti Radix (Fuzi, Fuzi) 10g, Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma (Baizhu, Baizhu) 10g, Zingiberis Rhizoma (Ganjiang, Ganjiang) 10g, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma (Gancao, Gancao) 10g, Coptidis Rhizoma (Huanglian, Huanglian) 10g, Cinnamomi Cortex (Rougui, Rougui) 9g.
Visited the next afternoon. Consciousness clear, urination and defecation normal, extremities warm, blood pressure 100/70 mmHg. Took 2 more doses consecutively, recovered.
Another example: Patient He XX, female, 36 years old. Ectopic pregnancy, intestinal obstruction, shock. Previous treatment with blood transfusion and Single Ginseng Decoction (Dushen Tang, Dushen Tang) showed no improvement. Urgently invited for consultation. Observed cold extremities, cold forehead, ear shells, and chin as ice, unclear consciousness, pulse minute and nearly imperceptible. Also observed abdominal fullness and distension, obvious resistance and tenderness in the epigastrium. Synthesizing pulse and symptoms, diagnosed as severe decline of Yuan Qi (Original Qi), Fu Organ Excess complicated by Blood Stasis. Planned to use Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma (Renshen, Renshen) to greatly tonify Yuan Qi, Immature Bitter Orange (Zhishi, Zhishi) and Magnolia Bark (Houpo, Houpo) to break Qi stagnation, Peach Kernel (Taoren, Taoren) to invigorate Blood, and Morning Glory Seed (Erchou, Erchou) to purge downward. Next day, consciousness cleared, blood pressure rose from 40/20 mmHg to 100/78 mmHg.
Intestinal Obstruction in the Syndrome of Guan-Ge (Obstruction and Rejection): Recent physicians follow the principle that the Six Fu Organs prefer smooth flow, strongly advocating purgative methods to treat intestinal obstruction. However, clinical application often fails. Carefully considering the reason, it is failure to differentiate Deficiency/Excess and Cold/Heat. Differentiation of Deficiency/Excess and Cold/Heat especially requires abdominal palpation. I once treated patient Geng XX, male, 78 years old. Suffered from small intestine hernia for decades. Previously, each episode improved quickly with manual elevation. But two days ago, due to excessive walking, sudden unceasing abdominal pain, inability to pass stool, unceasing vomiting. Doctors initially tried manual elevation, ineffective. Then treated with Compound Da Cheng Qi Decoction (Fufang Dachengqi Tang, Fufang Dachengqi Tang) and black bean oil enema, still ineffective. Observed unclear consciousness, cold hands and feet, abdominal distension, but soft upon palpation, vomiting and hiccuping, food/drink continuously flowing from mouth corners, white tongue coating, deficient-rapid pulse. Synthesizing pulse and symptoms, pondered: Abdominal distension large but soft upon palpation indicates Deficiency complicated by Qi stagnation. Treatment should warm the Middle, strengthen Spleen, regulate Qi, and reduce distension. Prescription: Magnolia Bark (Houpo, Houpo) 24g, Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma (Renshen, Renshen) 10g, Zingiberis Rhizoma (Ganjiang, Ganjiang) 12g, Fresh Ginger (Shengjiang, Shengjiang) 10g, Roasted Licorice Root (Zhigancao, Zhigancao) 10g.
After one dose, much flatus passed, stool moved, abdominal distension significantly reduced. Continued one more dose, all symptoms disappeared, recovered.